If what you way is true, then Q is either mistaken, lying, or a Larp.
I will have to side with Q on this one.
Bagster
There are military tribunals underway every day, and some against "unlawful combatants."
The combination that is approximately forbidden by the civilian courts is US citizens in military court. The only way around that is to disable the civilian courts, and even the Civil War didn't go that far.
Not that civilian courts couldn't be shut down or circumvented, but that condition would take or be a radical change from status quo.
The rhetoric in the case you cited is a distinction by Congress. The branch that defends the civilian courts is the civilian courts. IOW, the distinction we look for is not one that Congress does or does not make, it is one that the courts make or do not make.
If national emergency is a trigger to shut down the civilian courts, then why are the civilian courts still open?
If what you way is true, then Q is either mistaken, lying, or a Larp.
I will have to side with Q on this one.
Bagster
Pearls and all that.