Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reclining and Dining (and Drinking) in Ancient Rome
The Iris ^ | Shelby Brown

Posted on 08/12/2018 4:49:25 PM PDT by SamAdams76

The ancient Greeks had a recumbent approach to their (male-only) dinner parties, as I discussed in a previous post: elite men reclined, propped on pillows, to drink, converse, and—sometimes—overindulge.

The practice of reclining and dining continued into ancient Rome, but with a few additions—for one, respectable women were invited to join the party, and for another, drinking was not a separate, post-dinner event, but became part of the dining experience. An association of dining with luxury led to 19th-century depictions, like the one above, of Roman diners leading the soft life (here, without reclining).

The Greeks used single couches onto which companions were often squeezed for after-dinner drinking parties. The practice seems to have been adopted from the east, where it was a form of dining for elites. In Rome, couches for single (generally male) diners existed, but by the late Republican and early Imperial period the practice at dinner parties was for guests to recline on three large beds placed in a U shape in a triclinium (dining room). Reclining at parties continued to be primarily an elite practice—poorer people had no room for beds of this size. Although in the “old days” reclining had been shameful for respectable women, they now reclined with men, although some old fogeys disapproved, as we know from texts by Isidore of Seville (Etymologiae 20.11.9) and Valerius Maximus (De Institutis Antiquis 2.1.2).

Surviving triclinia with built-in cement dinner couches (the elegant mattresses long since destroyed by time) show that the beds were strongly angled upward to elevate the diner above the tabletop. In contrast, portable beds used cushions like those on Greek beds to elevate the diners.

As still happens at formal dinners today, places were designated for host, favored guests, and less-favored guests. In his Satire 8, the Roman poet Horace reveals “status seating” in action and shows how hard a Roman host (in this case, an unappreciated one) might work to impress a guest.

Ancient sources of course take it for granted that the reader knew all about dining protocol, and therefore authors didn’t bother to explain the rules for dining with crystal clarity. Scholars sometimes debate the locations of the best seats. (The Romans themselves called the reclining spots sedes, seats.) We know that the middle bed (lectus medius) offered a very good location, and there is evidence that the middle seat in this middle bed was an especially honorable one. Certainly it would have suited the Roman appreciation for symmetry. Queen Dido positioned herself “on a golden couch, in the middle,” when she feasted with Aeneas and Cupid, disguised as Aeneas’s son (Virgil, Aeneid 1.1.297–700).

This digital recreation of diners in the triclinium of the Roman villa at Boscoreale shows how the eyes of a person entering the dining room were drawn to the middle seat on the middle couch.

Guests reclining on this middle couch (lectus medius) could speak easily with the host to their right (on the low couch, lectus imus) and also look out at a view of the home’s courtyard or garden, a view carefully designed to impress, as shown on the seating diagram above. In contrast, diners on the high couch (lectus summus) to the left of the important guests (to the right of the person entering the room) could not see the view without twisting uncomfortably.

The re-creation of dining couches in the famous Villa of the Mysteries (below) shows how guest and host beds permitted a view out the main doorway (through which the viewer is entering), and in this case also into a peristyle at right, while the less important diners could only see the opulent wall paintings that decorated Roman triclinia—still not a bad view, however!

In time, Romans with space for serious entertaining increased the number of couches and hosted bigger dinner parties. Another type of couch, a semi-circular stibadium, eventually replaced the three beds. While literary descriptions of reclining and dining faded in the third century A.D., dining rooms for extremely wealthy recliners endure in the archaeological record into the sixth century. However, the collapse of the western Empire and the incursions of “barbarians” with newfangled dining agendas inevitably took their toll. In the eastern Empire, imperial dining rooms and elaborate church art still reference reclining and dining until A.D. 1000. Thus, the elitist practice of recumbent dining lasted the longest in the east, where it originated.

To explore more about the history of reclining and dining, see the entry in Brill’s New Pauly, and this article on status at mealtime in the Roman house. Or pull up a bed and crack open the wonderful book The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality by Katherine Dunbabin—along with, of course, a bottle of wine.


TOPICS: Food; History
KEYWORDS: dietandcuisine; godsgravesglyphs; romanempire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Tax-chick

Well at least there was one...and she is not around anymore.


21 posted on 08/12/2018 6:20:48 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; ...
Thanks fieldmarshaldj. Nice collection, I just finished an Atkins frozen meal. :^)

22 posted on 08/12/2018 6:28:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

She was a goddess, though.


23 posted on 08/12/2018 6:28:29 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Fill in my standard rant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

Greek banquets were all male but Roman banquets included women; that’s what I got from the readings.


24 posted on 08/12/2018 7:30:54 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

I think I would have sat in one of the chairs with the women. I would hate to eat and drink lying down. They would probably have kicked me out of the party—if I hadn’t left before they could.


25 posted on 08/12/2018 7:37:23 PM PDT by Savage Beast (President Trump has remained steadfast! This is leadership! Steadfast, America! We shall overcome!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

A Roman vomitorium was a corridor or passage way at an amphitheater that allowed many people to be seated, or to exit, rapidly. It wasn’t ever a place dedicated to Romans vomiting in order to make room for more food. That’s a myth.


26 posted on 08/12/2018 9:15:30 PM PDT by coop71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Nice pics, btw. Subthread from the Greek eatin’ thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3678733/posts?page=24#24


27 posted on 08/13/2018 12:08:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rushmore Rocks

I second that.


28 posted on 08/13/2018 5:14:24 AM PDT by Rappini (Compromise has its place. It's called second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

29 posted on 08/13/2018 5:20:52 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Trump: "I am Batman!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker
” The women guests sat in straight back chairs. They probably didn’t get indigestion as much.”

Against indigestion and GERD, my doctor has me adjusting my bed on a slope, with the head about 4" higher than the foot.

30 posted on 08/13/2018 5:46:22 AM PDT by Does so (No mention of "Brown Shirts" on this page?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Does so

“Against indigestion and GERD, my doctor has me adjusting my bed on a slope, with the head about 4” higher than the foot.”

I had the surgery to fix GERD. It didn’t.


31 posted on 08/13/2018 8:15:53 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: coop71
A Roman vomitorium was a corridor or passage way at an amphitheater that allowed many people to be seated, or to exit, rapidly. It wasn’t ever a place dedicated to Romans vomiting in order to make room for more food. That’s a myth.

That's correct, coop71. Thanks for pointing it out.

32 posted on 08/13/2018 10:49:08 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I see what the artist did there. Took a moment.

;^)


33 posted on 08/14/2018 9:55:39 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

“. A large slab of marble, perhaps”

There are a lot of marble counter tops in the Pompeii excavations.


34 posted on 08/14/2018 10:30:15 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Consensus isn't science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson