How Amtrak Fails the National Parks and America

Editor's note: National parks historian Alfred Runte has over the years closely watched how Congress has managed and funded Amtrak. Although funding for Fiscal Year 2019 is halfway to being assured -- the Senate has approved $50 million for the railroad, but the House of Representatives has yet to take up the measure -- he reminds us that only weeks ago Amtrak’s board approved the scenario here. A stay of execution for the Southwest Chief aside, Dr. Runte continues to lobby for the trains Americans deserve — and notes how to make that possible.

Imagine you’re a European travel agent with a client who wants to visit Grand Canyon National Park. She would prefer to take the train. At your local library you find a copy of Trains of Discovery: Railroads and the Legacy of Our National Parks, and start making plans from there. A few pages in, you learn that America’s railroads were instrumental in establishing the national parks — and the National Park Service. And yes, a train to Grand Canyon is available. It’s called the Southwest Chief. Departing daily from Chicago and Los Angeles, the Amtrak passenger train makes the 2,265-mile journey end-to-end in about two days. At Flagstaff, Arizona, a shuttle transfers passengers to the Grand Canyon Railway at Williams and the remaining 65 miles to South Rim. The Grand Canyon Railway, privately restored in 1989, is a remarkable story in itself. Another piece of history, the Harvey Girls, explains how the Southwest captured America’s heart.

Who were the Harvey Girls, your client asks? You recommend the movie starring Judy Garland. Meanwhile, she should start in Chicago, so she, too, can watch the West unfold.

Although no longer the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe, the Amtrak route is flanked by glorious scenery. And a few remaining Harvey Houses, notably La Posada in Winslow, Arizona. Also the stop for the Southwest Chief, a yawning gate greets arriving passengers, while, to the delight of guests, today’s railroad, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), sends scores of freight trains past the hotel property. From that description, your client is sold on the trip. Weeks later, from her seat aboard the Southwest Chief in Chicago, she informs you the train left Union Station on time. “Wonderful,” you send her a text in reply. And you say Amtrak actually washed the windows?

As the Southwest Chief speeds west from Chicago, passengers enjoy the lush fields of Illinois before crossing the Mississippi River into Iowa. By morning, with Missouri behind, the train arrives in Dodge City, Kansas. Soon in Colorado, and seemingly in the middle of nowhere, your client is in for a big surprise. “La Junta!” the conductor barks, then adds a startling announcement: “Last stop! Everyone off the train!”

“Not with Amtrak,” the conductor retorts. “Starting today, we’re no longer running the train through to Los Angeles. We do provide a connecting bus, but that only goes as far as Albuquerque.”

By now, totally incredulous, your client texts you back: “I’m stuck in La Junta, Colorado! What is this? Another fast one by Donald Trump?!”

You know better, by now having read another book, Allies of the Earth: Railroads and the Soul of Preservation. Both political parties have failed the public. Amtrak started as a mess, and became an even bigger mess. After all, that’s the way Congress and the railroads wanted it.

Debating Amtrak in 1970 — leading to its launch the following year — Congress still expected its life to be brief, likely no longer than five years. The whole point of Amtrak was an orderly transition, that as opposed to dropping every train at once.

And still, on beginning operations May 1, 1971, Amtrak threw order to the winds, cutting all but 180 of the nearly 400 trains it had inherited from the railroads just the day before.

And to think, as of 1929, the United States had 20,000 intercity passenger trains. By 1939 they included the ten fastest trains in the world, with names like Hiawatha, Twentieth Century Limited, and Super Chief.

But back to 1971. The fix was in and Congress knew it. It was just a matter of time.

Just as suddenly, if not quite out of the blue, Amtrak won a reprieve. The irony is from where and by whom — OPEC. By the fall of 1973, the cartel, centered in the Middle East, was withholding millions of barrels of oil from US markets. Take that for supporting Israel, they said.

By Christmas and well into the spring of 1974, American motorists found themselves trapped in gas lines. Please, God! Let one filling station still be open! To be sure, often the waiting cars and rising tempers stretched around the corner for blocks.

In Washington, DC, Congress panicked. Should the worst case scenarios prove true — and OPEC not give in — America’s aging railroads, and likely even Amtrak, would be needed to keep the country moving. Of course, when oil reached OPEC’s target price, poof! The gas lines disappeared. The public soon forgot how close the nation had come to unraveling, but in the next election did choose a Democrat.

No matter, the moment Jimmy Carter settled in at the White House, Amtrak was back on the chopping block. What energy crisis? A trained engineer, President Carter wasn’t fooled by OPEC or experts predicting the so-called end of oil.

However, by then Amtrak itself had seen an opportunity for survival, having hunkered down, as of 1976, in the one place Congress had actually bought tracks for the company — the Northeast Corridor. Granted, the long-distance trains generated 60 percent of Amtrak’s business, but that required dealing with the railroads.

Allegedly (and Amtrak alleged it vigorously), what it called “emerging corridors” were the future, and its tracks, so-called BosWash (Boston to Washington via New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore) the granddaddy corridor of them all.

And thus the disconnect leading to La Junta and your stranded client. A remade Amtrak, arguing only for itself, determined to jettison the national system.

Too cynical? That’s what I thought — until joining the fight for the national system on Capitol Hill. Why not have more trains to the national parks, I asked Amtrak’s Vice President of Marketing? “You mean Indian Country?” he replied derisively. “I don’t want the cowboys and Indians market,” he added, and shuffled off.

He meant it, too, insisting that every train west of Chicago should be dropped and its equipment assigned to one or more of the corridors. Amtrak, making good the promise, then cut the last train to Yellowstone National Park, the North Coast Hiawatha, in October 1979.

True, no sooner had Jimmy Carter left the White House than Ronald Reagan picked up the drumbeat. However, the crippling cuts — and voodoo economics — had begun under President Carter. Reagan was just following through.

Face it. History determines outcomes. History alone has protected the long distance trains, that is, what few of them remain. Every time Amtrak or the White House tried to finish them off, the American public — fondly recalling that history — reared up and cried no way.

This time I’m not so sure. Allegedly, some in Congress hope to win additional funding for the Southwest Chief, but that’s never stopped Amtrak before.

Certainly, they continue to claim the Northeast Corridor is profitable, while everything else is a bust. Rather, the Northeast Corridor could be profitable — and would be profitable — if only Amtrak didn’t have to run the long-distance trains.

The facts are just the opposite. As I wrote for the Washington Post in March 1979, the long distance trains are the moneymakers, indeed, the cash cows holding up the Northeast Corridor.

Wait a minute. That doesn’t make sense. Certainly you would think — if the long distance trains were abolished — the Corridor would then fail, as well.

Indeed it would, nor did I ever say Amtrak made sense. What I did say is that its failed beginnings invariably structured its corporate culture. Finally, it’s all about peddling half truths.

In truth, Amtrak has never made a profit. And that’s the irony of it. Even Congress prefers half truths.

Others point to another truth. Nearly twenty percent of Congress comes from Corridor states.

No matter, the facts speak for themselves. The long distance trains, packed with tourists, provide a stability the corridors lack. In the first place, they run 24, 48, and 72 hours at a clip, during which the turnover between stops is constant. Each resale, whether in the sleeping cars or coaches, allows another premium to be charged for that ticket. Second, who cares if the train is a few hours late? Corridor riders care; they’ve missed their meeting. Tourists are seldom in a rush.

This is to explain why “the cowboys and Indians market,” as that Amtrak executive put it, is the one market, back in 1971, that even the western railroads thought they should keep.

Two did, at least temporarily, the Rock Island and Rio Grande. Why not the rest? Again, remember the fix; Amtrak was supposed to fail. In that case, all of the feeder routes into Chicago would be gone. Everyone, as did your client, would first have to board a plane.

As it stands, the public is growing suspicious. How is it that Amtrak, contrary to the airlines, believes solely in short-haul markets?

As I said in the Washington Post: “The economics of short-haul passenger service are as simple to understand as the analogy of the cab driver who refuses to go around the block when he can pick up a fare out to Dulles. People in the corridors simply don’t ride far enough to generate enough revenue to cover the fixed costs of building and maintaining the system.”

Europe knows this — and overlooks it. But Europe also fills in the blanks. Never have we admitted, as has Europe, that passenger trains are critical for the economy. American tourists, flocking to Europe’s trains, spend billions of dollars vacationing abroad.

To that we just throw up our hands and say: But they’re small countries! Case closed!

No, case reopened. The argument is pure bunk. Together those “small” countries still make up a continent. We lost our trains by selling our continent short.

But dump our European guests in La Junta? Then demand they take a bus? Even if the Southwest Chief is saved — for now — Amtrak is renowned for doing much worse.

As airline critics put it, I say we stop thinking from the middle seat. Better we should dump Amtrak than put up with its nonsense for another 50 years.

Note carefully, however, how I said that. Dump Amtrak — not the passenger train.

It’s time the railroads took them back, and yes, we should be willing to pay what it costs. After all, we’re paying Amtrak now to be just plain stupid. What do we have to lose?

History suggests a time-tested formula — cost plus seven percent. During World War II, with our backs to the wall, we did exactly that. Build the airplanes and tanks and give us the bill. We the taxpayers will add seven percent.

Of course, no scrimping on quality — and not another Amtrak. We want the best tracks, signals, rolling stock, and maintenance.

A train to Grand Canyon? Actually, we deserve three — one every morning, afternoon, and evening. And that’s another thing about Amtrak — often its only train arrives in the dead of night.

Allegedly, even BNSF is finally “appalled” (their word). The Southwest Chief should not be cut. Fine, then is the railroad appalled enough to take it back? No, but what would Warren Buffett say (he owns the railroad) if we offered him cost plus seven percent?

Finally, we might then give Amtrak what it wants — the right to operate just the Northeast Corridor. When they fail (as surely they will), Congress can restructure that, as well.

Right now, I’m more concerned about the Grand Canyon, and yes, Glacier National Park. Were the Empire Builder, like the Southwest Chief, to be scuttled, another great park would be isolated. Where is it written that everyone is obligated to drive, playing bumper tag with heavy trucks?

I know. I’m the mad uncle again ruining everyone’s Sunday dinner. But raise your hands, and be honest. How many people you loved have died in traffic accidents? A friend of mine in junior high school died when hit by a train, but she was in a car.

Stop, look, and listen, and for once, be informed. Dare to question Amtrak’s “authority.” Even some in Congress finally admit its accounting methods are bogus. If only Congress would enforce the admission.

What Congress does best is spend your money. So, tell them how you want it spent. No more spending on Amtrak. Cost plus seven percent. For once you want a rail passenger system the country can be proud of. Mediocrity is just not service. Subsidy? You don’t care what they call it. Just get the job done and keep the trains. You love Indian Country; you love the national parks. It’s Amtrak that belongs in Hells Canyon.

Same thing in Iowa. Instead of connecting the Quad Cities (Davenport), Iowa City, Des Moines and Council Bluffs/Omaha it goes through very small towns in Southern Iowa Like Mt. Pleasant Fairfield and Ft Madison.

Another better alternative is the Union Pacific line that runs through Cedar Rapids, Ames, and Clinton.

I never understood why the trains don’t connect the actual population centers where the potential customers are.

Many of the old abandoned Pacific Electric lines have come back in the modern era.

I had read that the P.E. rights of way were deliberately sold off to make sure that rail was really dead. Of course the new light rail route between Long Beach and L.A. is going to be pretty much in the same place as the old P.E. lines since the towns haven’t moved very much. It just made the cost much higher.

Rode the P.E. (never called it the Red Car) a lot as a lad. The cars were old and pretty run down. When the L.A. MTD took them over, the handwriting was on the wall.

Of all the money my government spends or wastes money on, Amtrack aggravates me the least. I know it doesn’t come close to paying for itself today. But if we abandon rails now and lose the entire infrastructure, we’ll never be able to put it back together in 30 years or so.

There are lots of reasons Americans don’t routinely travel by rail today while Europeans do. They are NOT smarter or more enlightened than we are; it’s just that the history, circumstances and distances covered are significantly different.

Under cost-plus-7-percent, each passenger train makes a profit, and the more passenger trains you run, the more profit you make.

Well, yes. Guarantee me cost-plus-7-percent, and I'll make anything work. But why should we guarantee the rail unions, and rail management, a cost-plus deal in an inherently uncompetitive industry in which most routes are natural monopolies?

I've taken a handful of long distance trail trips in recent years. It's a pleasant way to travel when you have time to burn. But it's cheaper to fly, and for intermediate trips, the high cost is prohibitive for families, who will almost always opt to drive.

We took the Great Northern from Portland to Glacier. The dining car joined us in Spokane. We arrived at the west entrance three hours late due to freight trains having priority on the tracks.
Our return trip was even worse as the train was 5 1/2 hours late just getting to the portal.
Speaking to the porters, we were told this normal.

Never again.

As the Southwest Chief speeds west from Chicago, passengers enjoy the lush fields of Illinois before crossing the Mississippi River into Iowa. By morning, with Missouri behind, the train arrives in Dodge City, Kansas. Soon in Colorado, and seemingly in the middle of nowhere, your client is in for a big surprise. “La Junta!” the conductor barks, then adds a startling announcement: “Last stop! Everyone off the train!”

In 1980, I took a round trip to Ann Arbor, Mich. on Amtrak, following the same route. I was with Youth for Reagan, and we were on our way to the Republican National Convention in Detroit. Someone in the GOP hierarchy thought it would be wonderful to make this an old-fashioned "whistle stop" campaign trip, but we quickly discovered what it was like to ride on a socialist railroad.

We were heading across the Midwest during the hottest heatwave since 1936, yet the air conditioning failed--and the windows couldn't be opened. So everyone drank beer to stay cool, and the train soon ran out.

When told the train would be stopping for about a half hour at La Junta, many of us realized that would be a good opportunity to find a local liquor store and get some more beer. So we quickly found a store about a block from the station and mobbed it--and I was one of the first in line.

When we got to Ann Arbor, we were 14 hours late, and we returned to Los Angeles 12 hours late. I vowed never again to ride on Amtrak, and I never have to this day.

I’ve taken the steam train from Williams to the rim. We were “robbed” on the way back. I have pictures of my kids, arms up, holding their favorite Thomas the Tank Engines. If you want to bring back passenger trains, you have to make the journey as good as the destination.
Is the Trans-Canadian having this problem?

Amtrack management does not want to turn a profit. They have problems with how they account for everything, apparently due to the way their accounting rules work it cost less to sell a seat for a single trip from New Orleans to Chicago, than to sell the same seat three times for New Orleans to Memphis, Memphis to St. Louis, and St Louis to Chicago, even if the price for that each of those intermediate tickets was the same as the end to end ticket.

I believe that Congress and Amtrack’s Board of Governers should be given a choice, privatize Amtrack and get no further Federal monies, or spend the money over the next 10 to 20 years to creates a true national system. I believe that a true national system would have trains visiting all of the 100 largest cities (metro Areas) in the US at least 6 times daily, with a few exceptions (Amtrack will never have service to Honolulu HI, or San Juan PR, and Anchorage AK is unlikely, at best). Those 6 trains would be three high speed limiteds which only stop at larger cities and 3 slower locals that stop at every whistle stop on the route.

Note that high speed rail is not actually part of this plan, although as improvements are made to the system the limiteds may get to speed of 120+. Remember that for many countries high speed rail is a national prestige project.

.
>> “Imagine you’re a European travel agent with a client who wants to visit Grand Canyon National Park. She would prefer to take the train.” <<

See!

All you need is imagination and rail lines through rugged mountains in the SW Desert are a snap!
.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.