"One of us...."
Posted on 08/04/2018 10:40:40 AM PDT by CptnObvious
Why Would the New York Times Embrace Racism with Sarah Jeong when they're attacking Donald Trump for it. Can any of you tell me why??
If it’s against white people it isnt considered racism.
Uh, because the NYSlimes is a racis’ Political Action Committee?
Because it’s anti-WHITE, anti-MALE, anti-ORDER racism. Which is perfectly acceptable in the hypocritical circles of propaganda journalism.
The NYSlimes is nothing if not a harbor of White Privilege.
You can say anything you want against whites, jews and christians.
Well, she may be “racist” but she is the CORRECT KIND of racist, and that is all the difference.
White Christian males (or even some Orthodox Jew males) need not expect to be exempt from the wrath of the “purists” who dictate the standards of “acceptable” and “unacceptable”.
Now that THAT made me lol! (But I have a bizarre sense of humor)Thanks for the laugh!
I’m sure she will receive a “free speech” or some such award soon.
Business.
187 of their subscribers only pay to read attacks on Trump.
The other 63 subscribers pay to read attacks on white men.
Without those 250 paying customers they can’t stay in business - so keep them happy.
And, Soros isn’t going to pay the rest of their massive operating expenses unless they push his agenda. The most important thing about being a “useful idiot” is being an “idiot” - if you can do that Soros can find a use. So don’t bother trying to explain any contradictions to them.
My numbers and details may be off a bit, but that’s the basics. If you aren’t a customer and you don’t subsidize them, they don’t give a Schiff what you think.
Wont last long. The left don’t like to have to explain themselves. They’d get away with it if they had a monopoly on the news but they don’t any longer.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less...The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master - that’s all.”
I'm waiting for a NY Times statement saying that criticizing this wench is racist.
But there is the credibility issue. Liberals are pompous and keeping her would hurt their message of peace, love, and tolerance. They look like hypocrites.
It has never been about ‘racism’. It has always been about destruction of the West and you must tear down whites in order to do that.
Why are people still looking for consistency or integrity in anything leftists say or do?
It’s never been about liberals vs conservatives or white vs black.
It’s always been about good vs evil.
We need Jesus.
Hence forth and evermore we need to refer to this newspaper as ‘The Racist New York Times’. They have earned it!
Well white people must accept the challenge and wake up. White people are under attack and have been. The leader of South Africa has proposed to confiscate land owned by white people. Others have simply suggested that white people be killed.
This is war. Stand up for rights and maybe it will subside. Otherwise, get ready for confrontations.
A few years ago I would expected these words to come from a David Duke, but we really are under attack now. Not really by Blacks, Hispanics and Asians but by their Liberal, Communinst, Socialist slavemasters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.