Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Bacteria Are Becoming 'More Tolerant' Of Hand Sanitizers, Study Finds
NPR ^ | August 2, 20184:22 PM ET | Melody Schreiber

Posted on 08/02/2018 8:59:47 PM PDT by BenLurkin

In the early 2000s, hospitals across Australia began installing more hand-sanitizer dispensers in their rooms and hallways for staff, visitors and patients to use. Research showed these alcohol-based disinfectants helped battle staph infections in patients and certain kinds of drug-resistant bacteria. And rates of these infections went down. But other infections didn't drop when people started using the sanitizer stations. In fact, certain infections went up. In particular, enterococcal infections — caused by bacteria that affect the digestive tract, bladder, heart and other parts of the body — started increasing. This wasn't only happening in Australia. Countries around the world saw rises in this type of infection even as hand sanitizer became more popular. Globally, enterococci make up ten percent of bacterial infections acquired in the hospital. In North America and Europe, they are a leading cause of sepsis, a deadly blood infection. Now, researchers say, they may have found the cause. Blame it on the alcohol. New research published by Science Translational Medicine on Wednesday shows that several strains of these bacteria have begun adjusting to alcohol-based hand sanitizers. They're not resistant to the alcohol — at least, not yet — but they're becoming "more tolerant" of it, the authors write. That means the bacteria were able to survive for longer periods of time after being doused with alcohol. Article continues after sponsorship

The researchers used different strengths of alcohol concentrations to combat the bacteria, starting with 23 percent. Eventually, at a 70-percent alcohol mixture, the bacteria were conquered. Typically, hand sanitizers are 60 percent alcohol. To make matters worse, many of these alcohol-tolerant bacteria are resistant to multiple drugs as well. Half of the strains the researchers studied cannot be treated with vancomycin, a last-line antibiotic. That means the bacteria are spreading more easily within hospitals, and there aren't many options for treatment.

Goats and Soda VIDEO: Are We Headed Toward A Post-Antibiotic World? The researchers were surprised by their findings. "To our knowledge this was the first time anyone had shown hospital bacteria becoming tolerant to alcohols," says Timothy Stinear, a coauthor of the study and a researcher at the University of Melbourne's Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity. First the researchers compared 139 types of bacteria, looking at the same strains over a 19-year stretch — from 1997 to 2015. As time passed, the bacteria evolved to tolerate alcohol better. To be exact, bacteria collected after 2009 were 10 times more tolerant than pre-2004 bacteria — which corresponds to the national push to use more hand sanitizers. But bacteria don't always operate in your body the way they do in a lab. It's risky to test these drug-resistant bacteria on people, so researchers turned to tests on mice — a common way to model how humans might also react. The results were the same — the guts of mice quickly showed signs of alcohol-tolerant bacteria, even when their cages were cleaned with an alcohol solution. Health-care institutions trying to control the spread of these infections will need to "adhere rigorously to hand-hygiene protocols," Stinear says — and probably institute additional measures to stop the spread, such as increased hand-washing with soap after coming into contact with the bacteria. Lance Price, a professor at the George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health and the founding director of GW's Antibiotic Resistance Action Center, was also surprised by the findings. "I always thought of alcohol as being like a sledgehammer," says Price, who was not affiliated with the study. "But clearly, these are innovative organisms. And evolution happens pretty fast when you're dealing with populations that can double every 30 minutes and travel in packs of billions." The particular type of bacteria, enterococci, is most often found in hospitals. But this research has implications for any bacteria that may begin tolerating alcohol. For instance, organisms like C. diff, another rapidly rising infection that is difficult to treat, have hard shells that make it difficult for alcohol to kill them; the best way to get rid of them is to wash them down the drain.

"If you're washing your hands less because that alcohol-based hand sanitizer makes you feel confident that your hands are clean," Price says, "all of a sudden you can become a vehicle for alcohol-resistant organisms."

The research is still clear that alcohol-based hand sanitizers are more effective at battling some bacteria, like those causing staph infections. However, this study indicates that other bacteria are best cleaned off with simple soap and water.

"It's the physical action of lifting and moving them off your skin, and letting them run down the drain," Price says.

"We have to be careful about this new trend towards heavy reliance on alcohol-based hand sanitizers," Price continues. "Soap and water should be our number-one protection" — both in hospitals and for personal use. The next question, Price says, is whether the bacteria will continue to evolve and tolerate higher and higher doses of alcohol — or even stop responding entirely.

"Is it possible for these organisms to develop complete resistance to alcohol?" he asks.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: bacterialinfection; enterococcal; handsanitizers; purell; soapandwater; staphinfection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 08/02/2018 8:59:47 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I never believed in those ‘sanitizers’ seemed a bit too easy to solve all of the germ problems - guess I was right.


2 posted on 08/02/2018 9:14:38 PM PDT by BobL (I drive a pick up truck because it makes me feel like a man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

“I never believed in those ‘sanitizers’ seemed a bit too easy to solve all of the germ problems - guess I was right.”

Yes, I didn’t actually think about this in terms of bacterial resistance, but it actually seems to be a perfect set up for this. Infectious disease docs are always telling us to avoid using antibiotics inappropriately, as this can induce antibiotic resistance, but no one I’ve heard has ever talked about the same danger from broad use of hand sanitizers. Makes total sense that this would happen.


3 posted on 08/02/2018 9:20:34 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I keep the Purell in the car when I’m out in public. Use it all the time. I’ve been doing it for over 20 years & I can attest to a dramatic drop-off in catching common clods & such over that time.

It’s great protection in knocking down germs you pick on your hands every day in public.


4 posted on 08/02/2018 9:26:21 PM PDT by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


5 posted on 08/02/2018 9:39:57 PM PDT by bitt (“we know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death”!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

All of the anti-bacterial soaps and such are really doing a lot of harm to the good bacteria in the environment.


6 posted on 08/02/2018 9:41:11 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’ve never been a fan of the alcohol based sanitizers because of the harshness- drying out of my hands. I do keep some of it on my sinks and lavatories, but I also keep a spray bottle of hydrogen peroxide, which is what I normally use.


7 posted on 08/02/2018 10:10:01 PM PDT by matthew fuller (How many of today's voters have ever seen a half-dollar coin (or silver dollar)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
the bacteria will continue to evolve and tolerate higher and higher doses of alcohol

Just like Russians!

8 posted on 08/02/2018 10:27:30 PM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

It will be swimming in frozen lakes.


9 posted on 08/02/2018 10:31:54 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BBell
All of the anti-bacterial soaps and such are really doing a lot of harm to the good bacteria in the environment.

Barky banned them already.

10 posted on 08/02/2018 10:32:56 PM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

I was not aware of that. Thanks!


11 posted on 08/02/2018 11:03:34 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Ok everyone
Here’s your lesson again
COLLOIDAL SILVER
KILLS
ALL KNOWN
VIRUSES AND BACTERIA
THEY CANNOT DEVELOP RESISTANCE TO SILVER
IT DISBLES THEIR OXYGEN INTAKE BRILLIANTLY


12 posted on 08/02/2018 11:20:27 PM PDT by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sanitizers and wipes are for when you can’t wash.

When I have to use sanitizer I slather on a LOT of it, and give it a few minutes to evaporate naturally rather than wipe it off.

Better than nothing.


13 posted on 08/02/2018 11:45:22 PM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Of course they are.

We’ve seen it all before with antibiotics.

Some people never learn.


14 posted on 08/03/2018 1:03:07 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Makes sense. Sanitizers claim to kill 99.99% of germs.

It would seem that at least a portion of the 0.01% of germs NOT killed by a sanitizer would be resistant.

Eventually that's going to catch up with you.

Add with that anti-bacterial soap (which is more or less the norm), we're providing an environment where super-bugs can flourish.

15 posted on 08/03/2018 2:29:21 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech

Sanitizers and wipes are for when you can’t wash.

Exactly.

Why use it when water and soap kill 99.9% of the germs?

Purell works. I’ve seen case study after case study showing it does.


16 posted on 08/03/2018 3:24:21 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Really a very stupid article:

“But other infections didn’t drop when people started using the sanitizer stations. In fact, certain infections went up.

In particular, enterococcal infections — caused by bacteria that affect the digestive tract, bladder, heart and other parts of the body — started increasing.”

—-

Hand sanitizers aren’t supposed to have an impact on such infections. The article is nonsense.


17 posted on 08/03/2018 3:31:23 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I’m with you. It’s called marketing.


18 posted on 08/03/2018 3:51:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
From 2012, on a related note...

Hand sanitizer dispensers and associated hospital-acquired infections: friend or fomite?

19 posted on 08/03/2018 4:08:47 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And per the CDC....

Clean Hands Count for Safe Healthcare

...Alcohol-based hand sanitizer is more effective and less drying than using soap and water, and does not create antibiotic-resistant superbugs....

Page last reviewed in May 2017.

20 posted on 08/03/2018 4:12:01 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson