Posted on 07/25/2018 10:10:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
“Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
“The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
You both think this is about you. Whenever I see either of your posts, I scroll past them. I don’t think you add anything to the conversation. Do everybody a favor and disapear.
cripes...what I know and what I think I know vs. what I don’t know vs. I don’t know what I don’t know.....I don’t know.
I am running across more info ( true or not, who knows - Thanx, thanx a lot Jocko) where the NYPD never seized the laptop.
An example here ( with a contrary view by another tweeter BigFish):
https://twitter.com/TheHoneybee_/status/997760278187073536
Article from from the NYPost that includes the search warrant.
https://nypost.com/2018/05/17/search-warrant-for-weiners-electronic-devices-unsealed/
The attachments say that Weiner turned in his devices to: Granite Intelligence LLC 9/23/2016. ( why does a private firm need a warrant ? unless acting on behalf of LEO or Feds ?)
The Feds got permission to get the devices 9/26/2016.
No mention of NYPD.
The Feds then needed a warrant to search the devices. Again no mention of NYPD.
https://nypost.com/2018/05/17/search-warrant-for-weiners-electronic-devices-unsealed/ executed 10/30/2016 approx. 1.5 hrs after issue.
I’m starting to think more heavily that True Pundit and Erik Prince are full of sanitary canal water when it comes to the NYPD and NYPD quotes.
But don’t quote me !
The previous FBIvermin gave her immunity, and doens’t immunity have to be about specific crimes? Can it be a blanket immunity? And if it was granted by corrupt FBIers who themselves were committing crimes, I would think it would easily be nullified.
Plus the article says nothing about inHuman, and I never read she was given immunity, just these ones, according to the article:
Chaffetz said in addition to Mills, others granted immunity include John Bentel, then-director of the State Department’s Office of Information Resources Management, and Heather Samuelson, a senior adviser to Clinton.
I read it in a number of places. Its not a single source story. I think they really did have it for a period who knows how long.But once they have had it it’s likely they made copies.
I think your mind-reading skills are wayyyyy over-rated.
My moderately faint memory is that a Commissioner or some such upper level member of the NYPD was furious at what they found on the laptop. There were a few paragraphs related to that. And then the story was quickly . . . squashed or at least rationalized away etc. I don’t have any memory of other ref data points. Sorry.
smoky415
His last post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3662188/posts
My own opinion is that the NYPD had it and still has copies of it. Not sure why my conviction is so strong on such scores, but it is.
thanks. you are right.
Huma is mentioned in that article as having testified, but not specifically has having been given immunity.
True Pundit (which I don’t trust) says she was given immunity
Daily Mail says she wasn’t.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3804288/GOP-lawmaker-FBI-gave-immunity-Clinton-aides-testimony.html
I’m about ready to get out of the research business and become an interested observer.
great...can you point me to one that doesn’t refer back to True Pundit or Princes’s interview ?
Keep in mind that immunity has to go through the entire DOJ chain of command and the IRS as well. It would be almost impossible for a high-profile person to be given immunity without it becoming well known.
A lot of wrong stuff leaked as a certainty isn’t completely made up. No doubt various strategies and proposals get discussed in the DOJ, and even these preliminary discussions are leaked. What the ‘sources’ don’t know is what the bosses finally decide.
thanks.
Strzok’s leaked texts with Page about discussing Huma immunity and potential grand jury testimony with DOJ proves that.
Nothing shows other than discussions about it.
Everything is needed... reading others’ research and picking out the good stuff is needed, too!
I stopped reading the True Pundit a while ago as I saw stuff I knew was not true, and the rest I could read elsewhere.
“Recall also that Hot or Not was one of the seed concepts for these networks.”
Hey...
I was rated a *** 9.8 *** on “Hot or Not”..........
I hope he is the first of many.
Mark
NYPD didnt use the laptop for in his criminal conviction?
I don’t think so.
sexting with a minor on his cell phone - feds subpoenaed his cell phone records
u r both on the money
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-29/facebook-zuck-sued-shocked-shareholders-truth-emerges
No, I really didn’t know that Facebook started as Lifebook. Please provide a link. Because it’s not mentioned in any standard history of the company, which I previously quoted.
Well someone else already suggested that the FR class of ‘98 was full of sleeper agents, so your “non-random error” theory fits right in with that.
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.