Keep 'em coming as you see fit, goodman. It's good to know what our more feisty brothers are up to.
Bagster
House of Chan Update
“For a Kekking good time!”
A comparatively quiet day and night from the Internet frontier of the House of Chan.
Some conversations, observations, and revelations:
- Everyone is wondering when Q team will show up; tonight might be the end of “10 days. Darkness.” or Q might just be busy with all the overseas trip details.
- Elon Musk is getting crucified on social media based on information that he supported a Republican PAC. Based on Q’s earlier comments on Musk, he’s not very well liked no matter what he does.
- The Chan is under intermittent DDOS attacks which are causing significant difficulty for the posters but they are shouldering their way through the noise.
- Speaking of noise lots of shills and sliders tonight. More than usual? Dunno. There always seems to be a lot. “Slides/sliders” are posts meant to derail conversations into unimportant lines of discussion and waste space on the breads.
- DNA tests at the southern border are revealing that illegals claiming to be parents of children aren’t.
- The Virgin Islands have removed statute of limitations on human trafficking.
- Prime minister of Haiti has stepped down.
- A few bursts of discussion on Julian Assange and the news that the UK and Ecuador may be working on a plan to evict him from the Embassy of Ecuador in London.
- Some discussion to troll CNN’s Jim Acosta to ask about “Q”.
- A Q proof from Q’s Feb 16, 2018 post where he includes a statement that is verbatim to a DOJ press release on July 13.
- Finally, it seems China is the one that got all of the Beast’s emails; Germany and S Korea are also implicated.
I have to post and run, FReeQs. Lastly, thank you everyone for your kind words, thoughts and prayers the other night.
FReeQ on!
Kit
Keep 'em coming as you see fit, goodman. It's good to know what our more feisty brothers are up to.
Bagster
Sorry that new “proof” is weak. And we discussed it in the previous thread at post 941 + 943 the statement q posted in Feb was rosenstein statement after the first round of Russia indictments.
Rosenstein just repeating the same statement isn’t much of a proof.
A better proof is you have q posts from Dec 22nd laying out how the dossier came to be months before CTH, Dan Bongino or sharyl Atkinson started connecting the dots
Dec 22 2017
F-I/D-J ASSIST>
“INSURANCE”
/_\ >
HUSSEIN>
HRC>
LL>
JC>
AM>
PS>
(SUPPORT: CS, NP, AS, CLAS-1, CLAS-2, CLAS-3, CLAS-4, CLAS-5, CLAS-6)>
BRIT INTEL>
HRC CAMP PAY>
DNC PAY>
CLAS: 1-4 PAY>
STEELE>
PODESTA>
HOLDER RELAY SPEC RUSSIA>
CLAS: 1-9>
US SEN NO NAME>
US SEN CLAS-1>
US SEN CLAS-2>
JC>
LL>
HUSSEIN>
[FISA 2]
PRES DAILY B>
US SEN NO NAME>
NEWS SHOP>
BUZZF>
PUBLIC/NARRATIVE.
STAGE SET FUTURE PREVENT/REMOVAL OP.
RAMIF: US INTEL LEGAL SPY ON PRES CANDIDATE / PRES ELECT / R CONGRESS / R SEN / NEWS FRIENDLY / ETC>
Q
Back in March 2018, we initially outlined a strong likelihood about the origin of the material used in the FISA application; and how it appeared to emanate from “contractors” with access to the NSA/FBI database, Fusion GPS, Nellie Ohr, Christopher Steele and ultimately to Nellie’s husband Bruce Ohr and back into the FBI.
And while most people were just finding out that strozk had written about an “insurance” policy q had already laid out what it was
FBI investigator Peter Strzok’s text referring to “an insurance policy” against President Trump was reportedly arguing that the agency should probe allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Re: "A Q proof from Q’s Feb 16, 2018 post where he includes a statement that is verbatim to a DOJ press release on July 13."
I think there is some confusion about Q #780 of Feb 16, 2018 at around 5:58 p.m. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [#780] Q !UW.yye1fxo No.97 📁 Feb 16 2018 17:58:54 (EST)
“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity,” Rosenstein said. “There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.” ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The #780 quote is from the DOJ press release of February 16, 2018, which announced the indictment of the first group of Russians. The July 13 DOJ press release concerned indictment of a second group of Russians.
There are similar sentences in both press releases, but not verbatim.
Re: "A Q proof from Q’s Feb 16, 2018 post where he includes a statement that is verbatim to a DOJ press release on July 13."
I think there is some confusion about Q #780 of Feb 16, 2018 at around 5:58 p.m. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [#780] Q !UW.yye1fxo No.97 📁 Feb 16 2018 17:58:54 (EST)
“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity,” Rosenstein said. “There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.” ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The #780 quote is from the DOJ press release of February 16, 2018, which announced the indictment of the first group of Russians. The July 13 DOJ press release concerned indictment of a second group of Russians.
There are similar sentences in both press releases, but not verbatim.
Sorry about my double post
Thanks for the chan-chan update, Kit. Hope real life goes easy for you !
Thank you for reporting to us about the events unfolding at the House of Chan, KitJ.
And please accept my belated expression of my thoughts and prayers on your and your family’s behalf.
God bless
RE: on the Chans discussions
“More than usual? Dunno. There always seems to be a lot. “Slides/sliders” are posts meant to derail conversations into unimportant lines of discussion and waste space on the breads.”
~~~~~
This is something we are seeing here on these threads - pseudo Q followers pretending to want to learn and sidetracking/hijacking the threads and exasperating all the regulars who are bringing in new informatuon -
THIS is why we need to keep these threads clean - especially while we are waiting for Q -
Endless explanations to *sniffs*, and side discussions, dilute our impact.
Thank you (and others who venture there) for the periodic Chan reports!
Thanks for your report.