Posted on 07/11/2018 10:42:10 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming : major Swamp Draining. - overview
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Anonymous The Book of Q - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
“Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board “The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Rudy (I think it was) said on Ingraham that several FBI agents had contacted him today and more or less ranted about the embarrassing dirty awfulness of Strozyk.
For sure. Now, is that kind of class nature or nurture? DNA or training? Or both? I think at its best—it is both.
“For sure. Now, is that kind of class nature or nurture? DNA or training? Or both? I think at its bestit is both.”
Both. Nature and Nurture. We choose who we want to be. Good people come out of bad situations, and Bad people come out of good situations.
Morals, PERIOD.
We as society choose to teach morals or not. Disclaimer, this is my opinion
Mark Meadows: 'Enough of the Talk; It's Time for Criminal Referrals'
Wow...it’s been soooooo long since I posted on FR, that I just posted on the old thread. LOL!
Here goes again...
Hi everyone, slow night. I have been on a many years self hiatus from FR. Thought I would jump back in.
I’ve been lurking on these Q threads for forever. Kept me sane for the past 8 months.
Thank you ransomnote for the continuing work on these Q threads. And thank you bagster for the comedic relief and of course The Oracle. And thanks to everyone who posts on these threads. Excluding the annoying trolls.
By the way, did anyone else notice that Sean Hannity used the term “Tippy Top” towards the end of Thursday night’s “Opening Monologue”? This girl noticed.
Used to listen to Howie every day when driving. Funny, sharp and zings right in. Great interviews, too.
Your research is going to have poor results if you create questions as vague as those stated. Some of my friends do real sociological research, and would never approach it with the sloppiness you’re showing. I’ve been parts of groups before that deeply enjoy analyzing themselves and such research has always been done with university-level quality of planning, explanation and follow through.
Therefore, I conclude, without more data I admit, that you’re a journalist looking for material for a poorly sourced article. I find people respond positively when asked clear questions with explanations of where you come from, how you’re trained, and what you intend to do with the information obtained. Our experience reading slanted journalism doesn’t make many respond well to questions asked in a vacuum.
You also aren’t showing yourself to be a good researcher if you haven’t already answered your first question for yourself from the links at the top of the thread. Since they’re placed there to simplify the answering of those very questions for people curious about Q, it seems as though you’re asking to get the answer without doing the intellectual work involved. Which also makes me think journalist because tight time frames frequently obviate the ability to dig deeply, and the need is more for clever quotes than for understanding of a topic.
Your second question is, again, sloppy. But the particularly bad phrasing doesn’t encourage people to put the effort into giving lucid answers to unclear questions.
The neat thing about this particular group is that there are many very clean, clear thinkers who do excellent research, and their respect often goes to people who have those same skills. Others do, indeed, respond with bombast when confused. They also have unfortunate experience with people who come on, usually referred to as “trolls”, with the intention of wasting research thread time to slow down research, or who just enjoy the sound and fury they work hard to create. A valid researcher would need to distinguish themselves from those types.
hey Jack,
firstly, some of the stuff below is for all reading this and i in no way am trying to insult your intelligence so please dont misread what i am saying here, it is meant as an interest piece for readers here.
is it possible to ‘bring the internet down’ other than power outages, actually it would be possible. easy no, impossible, nope. but first a little clarification on wording.
its best to clarify here, if by internet you mean the server backbone that services like the web runs on then that is very difficult to disrupt. most people mix the web and the internet. technically they are 2 different beasts. the web ‘runs on’ the internet backbone. shutting ‘the internet down’ would require shutting servers (or denial attacks) down and as you rightly say power outages over a long period of time would be a way of doing that.
you could cause a lot of serious disruption by simply getting behemoth companies like microsoft, apple and google to redirect traffic (and they are both closely integrated into the US government already - well the liberal part at least). if any of these companies was told by the US to ‘stop’ i can guarantee you they would. on a related note in 2010 sen liebermann wanted a internet kill switch bill in congress created for presidential access. not sure how far that went tbh.
for the average user you could quite easily disrupt access. there is 100 to 200 root zone servers situated in hiddenish locations across the globe controlled by a independent org called ICANN. think of these servers as the central source of truth and all info is propagated from them (okay thats a simplification but stay with me). so when you contact a website the text you write is checked against a domain name server for the real address. if you wanted to ‘blind’ a population rerouting these addresses to the point that they never reply would be possible to do. also i would bet a huge percentage of people are pointing their browsers to googles’s dns servers (8.8.8.8), so interfering even at that level would screw up a lot of access. the vast bulk of people have no idea even how to change their dns server address or even what they are.
so by way of example what port number does our inbound email work on, your outbound port number? imagine microsoft, apple, and google closed these ports? email outages for the vast majority of the country would close. by changing 2 areas, email and browsing is down. (it would not be easy but it is definitely doable). another way would be to disable to login server verification process that checks your pwd. if you always got that to send a ‘fail’ notification, you could never login.
so if you wanted to ‘shut it down’ by simply interfering in the core companies would mean a huge swathe of people would suddenly be left with devices that wont ‘work’. lets be honest the average consumer has not a clue how this works...it just does..and they will use that ignorance to control.
in the US the govt has the ability to stop tv transmissions, they can control phones and in most countries even ham radio’s are registered (i.e. they know who and where you are). im not saying this is easy but governments definitely have that ability. its frequently done in dodgier parts of the world. recently turkey ‘killed’ social media access if i recall and so did (is) Iran not to mention chinas own ‘firewall’.
you would not need to shut it down, you can redirect to a server you control. a ‘mini me’ version of this is happening already with conservatives blocked on youtube, twitter, facebook as we speak.
so the definition of shutting the internet down needs to be considered. imagine you typed freerepublic.com and the CNN homepage appeared. imagine all of a sudden all the websites you use for alt-news...gets redirected. sure you could put in the ip address of free republic but how many here know it, i sure dont. will there be an underground, yep, in fact you would probably see the darknet take on a whole new interest. the issue is that is probably, what, say 3-5 % of the population at best.
its not something that would be easy of cheap...but it is doable.
just my opinion.
Flynn simply receieved a random 3 pm phone call to meet with "the FBI", and Flynn had been working security clearances for incoming Trump personnel during the transition. He assumed this was just another of those meetings. It wasn't. It was the sociopath Strozk's mafia hit on the General.
And THEN Strozk and McCabe illegally altered the interview forms the FBI uses - the 302.
But if this is acted upon, the FBI will crumble, and thousands of other cases are destroyed.
The FBI may survive this attempted coup d'etat againt candidate and President Trump, but I don't think it should. The corruption is too deep. The organization thinks it is the 4th branch of government.
And the fact that a Sociopath could so easily rise to the ranks of Deputy Director of a major Division of the FBI tells me the organization is out of control.
12 Telltale Traits of a Sociopath
1. Lack of Empathy
2. Cold Nature
3. Narcissistic
4. Grandiose Self-Image
5. Flatterer
6. Manipulative
7. Engage in Risky Behaviors
8. Unlawful
9. Impulsive Behavior
10. Irresponsible
11. Deceitful
12. Poor Social Relationships
I noticed the horns yesterday also.
Excellent research. Amazingly hits the mark. Thank you.
Did you see where Rep. Louie Gohmert finally had had enough of Strozk, and called him a liar to his face? Gohmert then asked Strozk if he had the same smirk on his face when he lied to his wife about adultery.
The Democrats blew a gasket.
Strozk then responded that Gohmert's "choice of attacking him about a family matter says more about your character than it does about mine!"
Adultery is a "Family Matter"?
Betraying your wife is a "Family Matter"?
Good gracious. Strozk is a pure sociopath.
But Strozk was only the mafia soldier. To the corrupt cabal, Strozk was their useful idiot. The Evil goes much higher up the chain.
Here is an appropriate meme.
Sorry, Sky. If skiing would make that meme more understandable, I fear I don’t have the background. Doing well, though finally got to an optometrist who has told me I’m now legally blind and can’t drive. Scheduled cataract surgery for two weeks, so looking forward to looking clearly. I fear I have to really peer at our thread to enjoy the good comments. Enjoy the memes. BIG print! Seeing old friends appear is ALWAYS such a pleasure.
Are we going to get a pic of the Belaz?
Good luck with the surgery. I had it done last year. The difference is amazing. The first thing I noticed after surgery was color. It was like going from a ‘60’s black and white TV to a 2018 hdtv.
Thanks, mk. Stopped watching TV and looking forward to going back to that and all the good things that come with clear vision. The reassurance helps!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.