She also wanted for abortion to remove from society certain categories of undesirables.
She’ll die soon, and the paeans of praise will resound from the Left.
But I say, good riddance!
And yet, how many Repuke Senators voted for this radical’s confirmation?
I hope the people here who voted for Perot in 1992 are happy about the ‘statement’ they made.
Just like the people here willing to sit out the Florida Senate race because Scott isn’t conservative enough for them.
Sorry, Ruth. The word “submissive” and phrase “subject to” is still in the Bible. Now if she had been blindfolded and just, she would also explain the concept of the greatest love, when a man lays down his life for his friend, which should include his wife.
Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Peter
Great article. Gives me reasons for hoping that she has a pleasant retirement real soon.
Wondering why this shriveled up old hag wants the law to allow sex with 12 year olds.
What is it about ugly turkey-neck, stern, angry-looking shriveled up hags with short hair?
Exactly right.
It is not the job nor does the Court have the constitutional mandate to change society.
The job of the USSC is to judge cases with in the very narrow scope of the US Constitution. They do not have the power to change the constitution or to interpret the constitution in the light of their own conscience or prejudices.
Sounds like she should be RECUSED from hearing most cases because of her Admitted Bias. See “dissenting Opinion” by the fat mexican in the Travel Ban case.
Leftists on Amy Coney Barret: "She's catholic and has seven kids? Dangerous nutjob!"
“Marriage is an obscene bourgeois institution.”
Which her deceased husband found out the hard way. Probably wanted to die after it dawned on him what he had done.
The irony about Ginsberg not retiring, or perhaps being kept on life support, till after the election is she expected that other paragon of feminism Clinton to win the election and select her successor. I don’t believe she was confident the Muzzie would appoint another woman after finding the two incompetents he found.
She is exhibit-1 in the dereliction of duty charge against the “conservative” GOP that did not match the Democrats commitment to principles by “Borking” her confirmation.
That article should’ve been heeded back in 93; but of course, (R)s always say, “The (D) is president, and it’s his prerogative”, and then vote “yes”. They figure the (D)s will return the sentiment when it’s (R)s’ turn.
And Lucy will not yank the football away.
Asymmetrical warfare is terrorism and tyranny.