|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 07/07/2018 10:04:09 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan” YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview Article Conservative Treehouse Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction Anonymous The Book of Q - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary “Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board “The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More” YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected - 6 min Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
What if Trump comes out tonight and puts ALL 3 or 4 of his picks up for the SC.
As far as I know there is nothing that says the number on the court is 9, right?
I love it when POTUS trolls the left!!!!
Thank You for the report. Appreciate it. Were any other homes harmed? I was thinking it could have been a controlled explosion in order to put them in Wit Sec. Just my theory.
Clean up please!
FDR tried to increase the number of SC judges to stuff the court left forever. Congress didn’t approve it. They wouldn’t go for it now, either.
Better judged by 12 than carried by six.
All the houses nearby had broken windows. The houses next door have police tape around them pending safety inspections. We’re about three miles away and didn’t hear the explosion, but we did hear all the emergency vehicles.
The number is set by statute. 28 USC 1.
That number has been 9 since 1869. There were fewer before then, and there is nothing that says the president MUST nominate so that 9 are seated. Leaving the seat vacant would be better than seating any person who is not a dyed-in-the-wool constitutionalist.
Debris has been cleared from the street, but where the house once stood, there is debris everywhere. I don’t think there’s anything left bigger than a handkerchief left.
That is an interesting question about number of justices on SCOTUS - and so I did a shallow belly flop swan dive into the shallow pool:
https://www.britannica.com/story/why-are-there-nine-justices-on-the-u.s.-supreme-court
Interesting article at link, but this is the relevant excerpt:
“...Basically, the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to determine how many justices sit on SCOTUS. This number has ranged between 5 and 10, but since 1869 the number has been set at 9. ...”
I hope you’re right. If you are, that tells me that the Clintons were stupid enough to have all their assets in places where the EO was able to freeze it.
(I’d rather have the used Kleenex. Eeew.)
Wanna bet he’s being held “incommnicado” because somebody promised him a deal? Whereby these charges would be dropped-or conveniently ignored-if he successfully was able to help with the “Trump problem” and derail the campaign?
Yes, wasn't going to post the story until I saw the Flynn Jr tweet.
Thanks for the insightful post. Your comments in 1.b have me thinking Trump realized that networks would shun anyone who was in good standing with him, but would compete to hire or interview people who appeared to be angry or disillusioned with him. Seems to be working.
2 “Then the team can observe the reaction to see if the public is ready..”:
I have wondered if Q communities serve as focus groups for the president’s messaging. I understand there’s at least one large Facebook Q group (wouldn’t Fakebook ban most Q content?). The different Q communities would represent cross sections of different demographic groups. I think administration staffers might make use of feedback gleaned from Reddit, Fakebook etc. to help provide feedback to describe the public’s responses to Q drops.
PS: If anyone has links to Facebook or Reddit or other Q community hubs, could you send them to me? I could put them in a table I am preparing to house in my profile for all the additional content we share on the thread and want to find later.
I’ve been thinking that it was tough for us to discuss the uncomfortable topics in detail (e.g., body disposal at the Standard Hotel) and now we refer to it in shorthand, but newly arriving people won’t know what we are referring to.
I recall a Q post that cautioned us that the Planned Parenthood content in an earlier Q drop should be flagged as sensitive material. The topic of child trafficking and related the cautions about wandering into videos or discussions which employ content that is too much for those dealing with current crisis (e.g., loss of a family member, exhausting medical diagnoses, depression etc.) we’ve shared on FR are all in the past threads. I would like to get suggestions about how to identify suitable content to point noobs to and stash it my profile. Using a second table to organize topics not stored in the main thread table, including sensitive material, will help noobs, but our daily conversational shorthand may baffle newbies sometimes.
I have a slightly different attitude re the trolling. Trolls succeed if they get us to respond to them, especially if we keep responding to them. My preference is that we ignore them.
“Concern trolls” love to plead with us to “help them” understand, and then they chew up miles of thread with their fake “neediness” until finally declare there’s no evidence and fake their disillusionment for as many more miles of thread as they can. Then repeated performances may include wistful requests for information if not complete repeats of prior performances. They sometimes wander on to Forum threads to whimper that they tried and tried to get us to explain it until (they claim) they finally realized “it’s all a larp.”
I’ve seen FReepers really spend time trying to help concern trolls with excellent collections of links and patient explanations and then later seen the same troll bleating the same request for “help” to others.
I think I know what you mean, though, when you point to fact-based responses. If we respond to them at all then yes, facts and links help 3rd parties new to Q watching trolls and FReeQs interact see that the evidence is on our side. It’s hard to know when encountering a troll post how many people have already responded to them, so unless you are caught up on the thread, a post to them is likely to just fan their attention seeking success. Again, my preference is zero response to them. Those wishing to address trollage without feeding trolls, can always share links with other FReeQs or post to their own username links and information that rebut troll claims.
Tummy rub. Brave TEXOKIE.
Sig .40. does not kick. Good for smallish hands.
REMEMBER the bikes and the stand that Q sent a few weeks ago??? This is a HHHMMMMM moment...
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/local/crime/article89158707.html
2 Hispanics found dead in MB 2 days after Seth Rich was murdered. I’ll do a bit more digging on these names.
Wow! Hope they had been deposed.
...AND more puzzles:
(from the article)
There is a very important article posted last night on The Daily Caller [SEE HERE] The article surrounds a discovery that Robert Mueller’s lead attorney Andrew Weissmann worked with four AP journalists on both the story of Paul Manafort’s business interests; and, more importantly, and jawdroppingly, the evidence for Mueller to use against Paul Manafort.
Read the article HERE. I’ll try to explain why this appears so important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
