There is no such thing as an incel because there are a lot of women who will hoe themselves out to any guy for the price of a drink.
Incel - that word hasn’t made it to the Oxford Dictionary yet, has it?
In my day, we just called them “Nerds.”
Also, the essayist doesn't come out and say it, but two solutions to the supposed incel problem are sex robots and legalized and societally sanctioned prostitution. However, progressive types at the moment seem to believe that sex robots are oppressive to women and prostitutes are all sex slaves.
What to do?
Now, none of this exonerates conservatives, of course.This is godless and satanic anti-family propaganda. Utter Marxist gobbledegook. The traditional family is the cornerstone of any society, and its breakdown destroys society.
All too many social conservatives want to shut down pornography, tighten controls on prostitution, and restore puritanical norms from a time when men and women could only try to meet their sexual needs within the confines of life-long matrimony. This obviously should not (and will not) happen, if for no other reason than it traps too many couples in emotionally and sexually dead marriages. …
The root cause is that its getting more and more difficult to get sex or a girlfriend. Society tends to blame the incel themselves but the defeatist attitude their critics characterize them as having has always been around. What has changed is the growing accusatory atmosphere and the breakdown of family and community where the guidance of boys by masculine male peers and fathers has been replaced with the ‘advice’ of post-menopausal lesbian college professors which of course is hardly the most effective way to get laid
Through out human history there’s been 2 systems of mating: Polygamy and Monogamy.
Monogamy we all know and understand. It’s essentially a system were wives are distributed in equal numbers to men. A man willing to work hard enough will always be able to acquire a wife.
Polygamy is where the Alpha males get most of the women and the wifeless men were often quite violent about the unequal distribution of mates. Men with many wives seldom put a lot of work in rearing the children either. Polygamists civilizations tend to have a lot of violence with men who can’t acquire wives either having to be funneled into wars to get them killed or to steal their tribe’s enemies women.
BTW, this is the reason that Islam is inherently violent. Islam without Polygamy tends to be stable and somewhat productive. But such things never last since the Mohammad promoted Polygamy.
The sexual revolution destroyed the old system of Monogamous pair bonding ordered by Patriarchy and allowed women to chose which type of system they wanted. Now the vast majority of men through out history have always preferred Monogamy beside the few Alpha males at the top who prefer Polygamy. Women on the other hand always like to mate up in the social hierarchy and when given the choice they’d rather share a high status man than marry a lesser man and have him all to their own. So women chose Polygamy and young men are becoming violent because of it.
There’s also a good scientific reason that young men who can’t get laid to act violently: It’s attractive to women. The normal social hierarchy is easily hacked by men willing to who appear to be violent and the easiest way to appear to be violent, is to be violent as seen in America’s inner cities.
The author predicates the entire article on the blatantly untrue pretense that promiscuous sex is the highest human objective. Far from providing joy and lasting happiness, sexual relations outside of the marital union it was intended for will only lead to sorrow and bitter loneliness. It is tragic that over-education pseudo-intellectuals like the author can be fooled into giving up their intellect and reason in pursuit of an empty base instinct. They would rather be worms than men.
Marriage and monogamy shouldn’t be mandatory, but they sure should be encouraged. That’s the problem. People think there’s something better out there, but it’s a lie straight from hell. There is no better sex than in a loving, committed, disease and risk free marriage that strives to follow God’s guidance. Promiscuity and adultery are selfish, sinful negative acts. Our society would be orders of magnitude better if more people married and stayed faithful.
In my early youth I was an incel. Then I blossomed into a major overactive massive exel. Bottom line... you are either too picky, a loser, or a jerk. Women love bumping uglies. True fact. If they are not lined up around the block to bump yours it is your fault. Mike drop.
Would a so called incel want a love relationship or just orgasms in a woman? Sounds like they don’t like women, or possibly people, at all, so why not work hard, save your dollars, and go see a prostitute if all you want is an orgasm with another body around? And if they want an actual love relationship with a woman, they need to love people. Severely disabled people have love affairs. Anyone can, if you have a loving heart. It isn’t the same thing as a sexual hookup. It is not possible that a loving person would not find someone to love, and be loved by.
That sick student from Santa Barbara wrote millions of pages about his incel life, but he was ONLY WANTING HOOKUPS FOR HIMSELF. He was too autistic to have ANY care about a woman or girl. He was only able to be concerned about what he felt he deserved, without giving anything. Buy a hooker if that is your issue. Don’t shoot up your school.
Another libertarian dreaming of the sexual utopia in which every genital urge is immediately gratified. It breaks down the instant Person A wants sex with Person B, but Person B doesn’t want sex with Person A. You can try to brainwash Person B into believing that he isn’t really a “Person,” just a mobile set of interchangeable gonads, but it doesn’t work.
The Feminazi goal was a lesbian (Kate Millett) led revolt to “take away HIS power”. She explicitly wanted to break up the family and encourage homosexuality among men and women.
This is BY design, it isn’t an “incomplete sexual revolution” although to the libertinearians at Reason they thought that was the goal.
Rosy Palm quit dating???? What is this world coming too!!
Send in the robotic hos. Cheaper in the long run.
There are two people I know. One a beautiful young model, another a tall good-looking and talented male college student. Both of these people whine incessantly about how hard they have it and what victims they are, all while being given opportunities that most people will never have, and blowing those opportunities. The model constantly goes on about how everyone else has to “check their privilege” around her because she has an eating disorder. The guy keeps going on about how everything is his mother’s fault despite her sharing his genes and having trade school whereas he gets to go to a University. Both of these people are fitted out to be golden boy/girl. Both of these people try to use their position in the hierarchy of victimology to bully other people. Interestingly enough I’ve seen 20-year-old men flee the company of the model due to her constant whining and I am told that the guy is an incel. I’d kind of like to get these two together, does that make me evil?!
The result of feminism and the sexual revolution is that 10% of the guys are having sex with 70% of the gals. Unless you are willing to “man up” and marry the obese, purple-haired, inked up, shrieking harpie who has had sex with 50+ guys and girls and God only knows what else (what could possibly go wrong?), your options are limited these days as a young man. The studies on the percentage of men that women find attractive are as amazing as the statistics on obesity. This is a sick culture. The most attractive guys can play the field like never before, and are perfectly willing to use these women. Less attractive women can get attention from “hot” guys by spreading their legs. When they get too old for this, and realize that Chad the stud isn’t really interested, they accumulate cats in rough proportion to the number of STD’s they’ve contracted, and whine about how guys don’t want to “man up” and support their illegitimate child from another man.
The guys have been raised in a culture that tells them they are not allowed to be masculine (if they are white), and feeds them a literal and figurative diet of poison to feminize them. As their consolation prize they get nerd culture, gaming, and porn. They flock to gaming because it’s an area that hasn’t been completely feminized ... Yet. They get their ideas about sex from porn, which might be less realistic than even professional wrestling. They live in a state of arrested development.
There is a usual Freeper objection to what I have described: a Freeper will know a young woman who is not like what I described. Said Freeper will think that this young woman they know is the rule, not the exception, as this type of young woman was the rule when said Freeper was young, probably 50 years ago. Things have changed.
Outside of a few shrinking islands of suburbia, where the mores and demographics of decades past are still observable, the reality is that this society is quite sick. I’m glad I don’t have to start over as a young person.
My ex-roommate was this kind of guy. Bitter that he couldn’t get any.
Well of course he couldn’t... he was bitter and angry all the time. Duh. Who the hell wants relations with that?
Those sexual revolutionaries are out of the frying pan into the fire. Words and “we musts” won’t help.
Count me among the Incels and thanks oh so much for calling me a Dork and a Nerd.
I’ve been married to the same woman for over 20 years. Sex became less and less frequent in the early years, ostensibly from a hysterectomy she had in year two. Daddy finally couldn’t stand it any longer and asked for an hour of marital bliss.
Her response echoes in my ear to this day. “I’m sorry but I just don’t have any interest in sex anymore. None.” That was 16 years ago and there has been no intimacy of any kind since. I asked again recently and her response was much less polite. I’ve run permanently aground.
I have never violated my wedding vows, and don’t want to. Maybe that makes me a fool but I don’t believe it is wise to break a promise made in the presence of God Almighty. Plus I keep my honor intact, which to me is important. Divorce Court is a death trap for men, so that option is off the table as well.
So yeah, I’m an Incel. I’m not about to commit acts of mass murder but I certainly am frustrated as hell and grumpy about my fate.