Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Impossible' EmDrive Space Thruster May Really Be Impossible
Space.com ^ | May 23, 2018 02:54pm ET | Mike Wall,

Posted on 05/24/2018 7:31:11 AM PDT by BenLurkin

The laws of physics have won again, it would appear.

For the past few years, researchers at NASA's Eagleworks advanced-propulsion lab have been putting a controversial and potentially revolutionary space engine called the EmDrive to the test.

The EmDrive, which was originally developed by British scientist Roger Shawyer in the early 2000s, purportedly generates thrust by bouncing microwaves around inside a conical chamber. Because the engine doesn't require any fuel, it could theoretically make spaceflight far cheaper and more efficient, opening the heavens to exploration

The EmDrive really shouldn't work. The engine doesn't blast anything out a nozzle, so Newton's Third Law of Motion — for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction — doesn't come into play. Nobody really understands how the claimed thrust could actually be generated.

And now it seems that the previously detected thrust was illusory, at least according to a team of researchers in Germany. They built their own EmDrive and tested it in a vacuum chamber, as the NASA researchers did.

The German team picked something up as well. But follow-up analysis "clearly indicates that the 'thrust' is not coming from the EmDrive but from some electromagnetic interaction," the researchers wrote in their new study, which you can read here. That interaction is likely between EmDrive power cables and Earth's magnetic field, the team concluded.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: electrogravitics; electromagneticdrive; emdrive; impossible; rogershawyer; stringtheory; thruster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2018 7:31:11 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The EmDrive really shouldn't work.

And it doesn't. Newton got it right it seems.

2 posted on 05/24/2018 7:39:08 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Imagine that...the laws of physics still apply. Obama should have signed an executive order decreeing them to be no longer valid.


3 posted on 05/24/2018 7:42:36 AM PDT by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It’s amazing how well experimental verification works to weed out false claims.

It’s not a coincidence, IMO, that today’s scientific establishment seems to prefer experiments that cannot be independently verified because they are too expensive to reproduce.


4 posted on 05/24/2018 7:44:52 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I suspect this will be studied for a long time by Garage physicists for a long time, like Cold Fusion.


5 posted on 05/24/2018 7:47:27 AM PDT by Paradox (Don't call them mainstream, there is nothing mainstream about the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Right up there with the Improbability Drive


6 posted on 05/24/2018 7:50:52 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Everybody is missing the obvious. Global Warming caused the EmDrive to fail. The pie chart below proves this.


7 posted on 05/24/2018 7:50:54 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Fanciest perpetual motion machine ever.


8 posted on 05/24/2018 7:54:24 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“That interaction is likely between EmDrive power cables and Earth’s magnetic field, the team concluded.”

Why couldn’t that be measured as the equal and opposite reaction?

One day chemical propulsion will ne obsolete.

5.56mm


9 posted on 05/24/2018 7:55:50 AM PDT by M Kehoe (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Maybe they should try a BM drive. That is one powerful force.


10 posted on 05/24/2018 7:56:36 AM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I am not a physicist, but I did stay at a Holi.....nevermind.

I have often wondered if science is correct about either/or gravity being a constant or the speed of light being a constant throughout the Universe. (WHAT!!!?????) I think we have either one or both of these wrong.

Science says gravity can affect the trajectory of light, but light has no mass. (Black Hole Theories). Is that not a contradiction in science?

So..... Science knows there is something missing in the understanding of gravity. We think we can verify it as a constant related to mass in our own neighborhood. But we know something else affects it in places we can’t quite touch or taste (dark matter, dark energy, anti-matter, etc.)

I speculate (not hypothesize) that gravity can somehow be manipulated so that it’s “waves” or “influence” can be changes as it relates to the mass of an object. That would be important if we were going to find a completely new source of energy and/or propulsion in space.

But Light? Does light have mass that should be affected by gravity. If so, then mass “can” be accelerated to speed of light. If that is true, than mass should be able to exceed the speed of light.

I am sure I am not the first to consider this conflict. I am willing to bet there are some FReepers that can explain why I am a kook. ;o) Fire away.


11 posted on 05/24/2018 7:58:16 AM PDT by Tenacious 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

The principle of generating small amounts of finite improbability by simply hooking the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 Sub-Meson Brain to an atomic vector plotter suspended in a strong Brownian Motion producer (say a nice hot cup of tea) were of course well understood — and such generators were often used to break the ice at parties by making all the molecules in the hostess’s undergarments leap simultaneously one foot to the left, in accordance with the theory of indeterminacy.

Many respectable physicists said that they weren’t going to stand for this, partly because it was a debasement of science, but mostly because they didn’t get invited to those sorts of parties.

Another thing they couldn’t stand was the perpetual failure they encountered while trying to construct a machine which could generate the infinite improbability field needed to flip a spaceship across the mind-paralyzing distances between the farthest stars, and at the end of the day they grumpily announced that such a machine was virtually impossible.

Then, one day, a student who had been left to sweep up after a particularly unsuccessful party found himself reasoning in this way: If, he thought to himself, such a machine is a virtual impossibility, it must have finite improbability. So all I have to do in order to make one is to work out how exactly improbable it is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give it a fresh cup of really hot tea... and turn it on!

He did this and was rather startled when he managed to create the long sought after golden Infinite Improbability generator out of thin air. He was even more startled when just after he was awarded the Galactic Institute’s Prize for Extreme Cleverness he was lynched by a rampaging mob of respectable physicists who had realized that one thing they couldn’t stand was a smart-arse.


12 posted on 05/24/2018 7:58:59 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

What’s “ne?”

Damn Russians.

5.56mm


13 posted on 05/24/2018 8:00:33 AM PDT by M Kehoe (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

It’s based upon the Covfefe Principle.


14 posted on 05/24/2018 8:06:09 AM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Gravity does not affect light, it affects the fabric of space around mass.

So, the light is still traveling in a straight line- but the line itself is in a curved space around the mass.

The same way gravity affects everything else. The earth is moving in a straight line too- but it moves around the sun only because it is in a path of distorted space that curves around the sun.


15 posted on 05/24/2018 8:12:28 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo


16 posted on 05/24/2018 8:15:56 AM PDT by coon2000 (Give me Liberty or give me death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

But NASA probably got 100M to study the problem.
So its ok then.


17 posted on 05/24/2018 8:20:47 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coon2000

LOL.

5.56mm


18 posted on 05/24/2018 8:29:50 AM PDT by M Kehoe (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Fine, then lets invent the magnetic field cable trust engine.


19 posted on 05/24/2018 8:34:54 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Interesting way to put it. Good post.


20 posted on 05/24/2018 8:40:33 AM PDT by afterhoursarmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson