Posted on 05/15/2018 12:33:26 PM PDT by ransomnote
Edited on 05/15/2018 4:37:56 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinion. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
Rudy is rope-a-doping Mueller. Seems to be working with him to gain concessions knowing POTUS is never going to give Mueller the time of day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K096sx5whTE BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! John Lee Hooker
Agreed on the definitions, but from what I have read, sedition may also be subject to, but not require, the death penalty.
it takes one keystroke to type - where as for a + I need to hold the shift key also, any other questions?
Thanks, Triple.
The culture, via soft landing churches and Public Education over the course of at least six decades has *progressively* tipped over to the dark side. It was a certainty the infiltrators would penetrate the highest offices in the land.
A wrecking ball taken to the universities and schools on the corner, along with the hidden computerized curriculum, could leave the good schools standing. I wonder how many that would be? Does my tag line work, about here?
Are we suppose to be looking for someone in these pictures. Like “where’s Waldo ?”
London? Seems to be cold weather gear.
Last winter?
#1413
Anonymous ID: 96ba5f 1448466📁p NEW
May 17 2018 18:02:12 (EST)p
NEW
May 17 2018 18:08:47 (EST)
>>1448466
We are everywhere Anon.
Q
_______________________________________________________
I hope you’re right. May be it really is a ruse for the DS to hear and salivate over hearing, as Trump sharpens their guillotine.
I can't speak for edzo, but I bet I can give a close guess, because I think he probably feels like I do about smoky's posts.
Threatened, you say? Not in the least. Beyond skeptical doesn't even approach it. What I see is somebody claiming to have special powers of perception and then claiming to have cracked certain "codes" which reveal things to him and only him. He then lays it out for our consumption in cryptic "Q-like" posts which we are supposed to decipher as if he himself had some reason, like Q actually does, to be cryptic.
Do like the rest of us do. Speak our theories in plain English text. Justify them if you can, and don't try to tell ME it's because some lyrics on a radio station are part of the Q program in some kinda way and are sending messages. There is no need for Q to work that way. None.
There is no hidden message system contained on the HistoryChannel.com. Again, there is no need to send top secret messages to us using that system.
One can take anything and make it fit into anything else if you try hard enough.
I'm not sure what smoky's game is, if in fact it is a game. Or maybe he truly believes that a King Tut mask on the history channel holds the secret to the Deep State's demise.
And this is the reason I'm opposed to Smoky's method. MANY people read this thread. How do you think we are being perceived when we get on board with such obvious wackadoo about song lyrics that have absolutely nothing to do with Q?
It's hard enough trying to explain Q without having to defend that kind of insanity. And, if I'm being completely honest, feelings be damned, it IS insanity.
I, personally, have a lot of time and emotion invested in working the Q program for the good of America and our people. I hate to see it divided and demeaned with so potentially harmful mental meanderings. Maybe talk amongst like minded people via mail? Take it to the Trump Train thread, which I hear is a less serious venue? You can talk about birds and King Tut till the cows come home over there, eh? I hear all opinions are equally valid on "The Train."
So, yea. That's why, cribb.
One man's opinion. It's okay to have an opinion, right Threadmama? Nobody bully me please.
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
Brilliant! Great sleuthing, FReeQ!
He’s taunting, or possibly giving proof, to cabal members; likely enough the pics are photos of the whereabouts of key players in real time (when they were taken) and published now to demonstrate that flight will be futile.
Considered a /S tag but those who know history know your answer.
And it really wasn’t sarcasm just an attitude that liberal have. Never their fault.
HMMM. Intriguing the timing of some demonic Democrat raising CAIN on the hill today, emoting about ZTE being set free by TRUMP, (paraphrasing, there), per his deal making with CHINA.
This is fun.They know about the meetings.Wonder who is in the pictures.
I know, I was being somewhat ironically politically correct for my own amusement. I do, however, believe that ANYBODY, if they are capable, man or woman, can do the job.
Haspel seems right, but in this business do we ever really know for sure? The Brennan recommendation does worry me a bit. Maybe a psyops?
You'll never EVER catch me endorsing anybody purely on the strength of their sex, race, or sxual orientation.
I'm a big Palin, Bachman, and Thatcher fan. Amongst others.
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
I know some people like that, too.
It is mind-boggling to contemplate their ignorance. I can understand not liking Trump. I can understand holding views more liberal than mine on various issues. But I can’t understand at all the teflon immunity to reality.
Where was it that we heard that in NZ, Hillary actually was out of surveillance reach, or boundaries. Does that ring a bell, not that that statement came from Q, but I recall it was bad news to hear.
I wondered at the time how that could be accurate, but now, hearing of untraceable phones, who knows.
Yes, but also in order to fly between the two spotters on the ground.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.