Q Anon: (5/4/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/4/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

Click the following link for the latest edition of the Bagster Bee.

#~~~THE BAGSTER BEE~~~#

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Steven W.]

Boente is another of these that seems to be in the mix of the black hats & Comey bud but may just be slimy vs. dirty ... I like the term noted last night (please forgive me which other poster) - LEVERAGED? ... TBD ;)

[Defiant]

Obama can have 2 more years. During that time, he can find a way to become President for life, maybe get his Iranian friends to nuke a city. The traitors were going it slow because they thought they had it in the bag, but after losing in 2016, they may take more desperate measures the next time they have a chance.

[greeneyes]

verbal discussions rather moot
That’s not entirely true. Information outside the contract (letters, verbal discussions) can be used to clarify the meaning of the contract. Most contracts contain a clause the forbids the use of such evidence, because otherwise, it is admissible. Outside evidence cannot be used to contradict the plain terms of a written contract, where it is clear that the parties intended that the contract be an “integrated”, i.e., whole, contract.
************************************************************
Hence the term rather moot instead of saying entirely moot.

While it has been about 50 years since my business law class, I do recall that the cases and appeals I studied then, always fell back on the principle that the written contract was the whole enchilada.

Any side discussions of importance, not in the contract, should have been added. Now that may have been the instructors intent-to demonstrate the importance of a complete contract.

However, I did do some additional research in the legal section, but did not find any cases contrary to that principle, though I am sure that there were Judges who might have ruled differently then and in the 50 years since then.

Hence the term rather moot, rather than totally irrelevant and entirely moot.

[Cboldt]

-- All because Sessions was snookered into recusing himself instead of doing his job --

That was you at post 945 in this thread. Based on that post, I put you on my "do not correspond" list. My prerogative, it cause you no harm, and saves me time.

You are of course free to post to me or pretend I don't exist. I'm indifferent.

I'm replying this one time because you addressed an obvious thoughtful remark to me personally.

-- Not exactly what people like me are saying. ... he allowed himself to be taken out of the equation entirely and let a DS Deputy create a firestorm that the President has to deal with every day from a phony allegation ... --

Either Sessions follows the rules governing conflict (28 CFR 45.2) or not.

Rosenstein and the people managing Sessions' Chinese wall are sandbagging him, sequestering hims from all sorts of stuff that he (Sessions) is not recused from. This makes a hot mess.

[Bob Ireland]

***Democ🐀 This is my favorite cartoon by you, Bobby ... how to give that wider play***

Go for it! It is just an emoji... Unhappily, it seems to display a bit differently on different devices; on some it looks like a rat, on some it looks like a mouse... too much above my pay grade - pauper! On a hat or T-shirt that wouldn't be a factor, would it?

[Cboldt]

-- Boente hasn't resigned/retired yet, any Qlues? --

Boente is now General Counsel at FBI, took James Baker's job.

In October, Boente, a career prosecutor, announced his plans to step down upon Senate confirmation of his successors. In November, CNN reported Boente had privately been in talks for several weeks about a variety of other law enforcement positions within the administration that he might be interested in taking after his successors are confirmed, according to a source with knowledge of the discussions.

Dana Boente picked as new FBI general counsel - CNN - January 23, 2018

[Bob Ireland]

***after losing in 2016, they may take more desperate measures the next time they have a chance***

That is the danger, for sure... what we are all watching. Right now they are foolishly lobbying for civil war... stupid!

[Bigg Red]

Mark

[Defiant]

At the risk of communicating even though I have apparently made it to your blacklist, I will address your claim that Sessions was required under 28 CFR 45.2 to recuse himself. As noted by Andrew McCarthy (former fed prosecutor) and others, the memo that Sessions was given was incorrect as to the requirements of the situation, and Sessions was snookered by career DOJ folks into the recusal. I read the articles at the time, looked at the rules, and by jove! he was indeed snookered. He should have stayed at his post. Instead he deserted.

[little jeremiah]

Rosenstein and the people managing Sessions' Chinese wall are sandbagging him, sequestering hims from all sorts of stuff that he (Sessions) is not recused from. This makes a hot mess.

If you don't mind, could you expand on the above? How do you know that they are sandbagging him, and I'm not sure what a Chinese wall is... And I looked up sandbagging, and there are two distinct meanings. I assume you mean attacking, not underperforming?

[Defiant]

Yeah, in any contract case, it’s not so simple. There is almost always a way to get in a discussion about what the parties intended if there is any ambiguity about a material term, and sometime even if there isn’t. Reality usually butts heads with those business law classes you took. A good judge won’t admit outside evidence about a term if the contract is clear; sadly, I find good judges who are strict about such things more and more rare.

[bagster]

:)

[eldoradude]

I avoid as much of it as possible.

A very wise protocol. I do the same, it seems to work more effectively if I save it for serious pain.

[Bob Ireland]

***He is pretty wack but did a great summary of Q’s stuff IMO***

It was just a yok comment. I don't know a lot about him... saw him often on Ancient Aliens - a program whose principle I do not embrace, but it was a great source of new archaeological information. I learned about Göbekli Tepe on the show and upbraided the archaeological mag I subscribe to for never mentioning it.

I just feel - like Sherlock Holmes - that the simplest solution to a mystery is the most likely; not saying that their idea is incorrect, just not my first choice.

I glanced over your linked page, but in my present health couldn't really dwell on it to any advantage. Tomorrow: roust up the doctor for some action!

[Defiant]

I’m not suggesting I’m smarter than Trump, I’ve been saying that Trump got screwed by Sessions and his recusal and failure to exercise supervision over RR and attack the deep state. I didn’t see that coming when Sessions was appointed, I thought it was a great appointment, and I think Trump did, too. It was after that that it became clear that Trump was screwed by Sessions’ recusal, and at that point, it was too late to replace him.

As to Sessions, I don’t know what they have on him, but either they have something, or he is the most feckless, inept AG in history. If it’s the latter, he didn’t show it previously. Therefore, I’m leaning towards the former.

[Defiant]

I don’t think we disagree about Holder vs Sessions. I’m not saying that Sessions should go after political enemies, I’m saying he should protect his President. Holder did that by being a criminal and pursuing good citizens. Sessions should do that by pursuing criminals and deflecting efforts to frame a good citizen (Trump) with phony charges.

As to what Sessions has done so far, the one effort we know about, he hired a Democrat from Utah to look at a criminal referral. Other than that, crickets. And then there is the war on marijuana, that’s important stuff. Oh, he had a nice press conference about pursuing leakers, and right next to him was our buddy, RR, who was deputized to take charge of that effort. Good stuff.

[Defiant]

LOL. If it was an accident, I would never admit it now.

[little jeremiah]

You seem to want to think that Sessions is a doofus do-nothing. Your points about Huber and marijuana show your bias against him, and your unwillingness to actually find out what the truth is.

If a person wants to know the truth, they have to be willing to follow where ever the truth leads, even if it’s a destination you don’t already know.

If you think you already know everything, you will never know the truth.

[WildHighlander57]

Info from Sara Carter about Sessions
(h/t sheikdetailfeather)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3653011/posts?page=2#2

The reason President Trump is not testifying
(h/t iontheball)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3653056/posts?page=50#50

[eldoradude]

Interesting. I have at least three unpublished books... I have never figured out the key to getting published. I post them on the web and they seem to do fairly well.

It's because you're honest and a man of integrity. I'm not saying Wilcock isn't interesting, and he has hooks that draw you in. I commented because he uses a style I recognize. I'll spend some time and come up with an example im more depth of what I'm trying to say - not picking on him so much as the genre. Always big promises with the carrot just over the horizon.

I think it's VERY interesting that you have 3 unpublished books. I'll have to check that out. ;)