Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Here's your homework assignment, Fantasywriter.
Sift through the entire body of my work. Then report back right here to this thread and post the times I said that Mueller was a white hat, a black hat, a grey hat, and that I was undecided. Same thing with Sessions. I don't remember having much faith in Rosenstein. Ever. Though, like you quoted me, in order for Mueller to be a white hat, I believe that Rosenstein would have to be also. After all, he appointed Mueller.
See the difference in what I just wrote than in me saying "I trust Rosenstein?" That's what I mean when I call you a liar. You twist words and take them out of context to make your points. That is scumbaggery of the highest order disguised as intellect. You are a fraud, goodman, but not irredeemable.
In your thesis on the collected works of the happy warrior Bagster, post where I discussed what Q said on the subject, though he hasn't definitely stated "trust Mueller". \Bbut you know that, because you read EVERY word Q writes and EVERY discussion and theoretical interpretation and analysis of his posts.
Oh, wait. You didn't? Then how can you keep parroting the same tired statements as gospel in order to "debunk" everything else?
You must see how illogical that is. You must know how intellectually dishonest you are. And I bet you thought you were really smart, being a fantasy writer and all.
Really, dude. Put that brain to work. It's getting embarrassing.
Bagster
Please think of new ways. Never seek to bore your audience. That is your fatal flaw.
Bagster
Just a troll.
That’s so sad.
Me: Anyway, Ive seen them on their threads explaining that Mueller is a white hat. If you trust Sessions, he has to be.
You: Stop lying. The doorman has been instructed not to allow you into the Qlub.
Me, quoting you: Another good day in Q land. LOTS of Mueller/Comey discussion due to yesterdays posts. Two teams went back and forth. Team Mueller and Comey white hat vs. Team Mueller and Comey black hat. Or even grey hats?
Strong arguments were made on both sides. This publication is undecided. The stronger argument was made for Mueller being white than Comey. But the possibility does exist for both. This reporter closes no doors.
Oh yes. It's very important to expose patriotic Americans seeking knowledge of the insidious forces out to topple our republic and trying to spread that knowledge to the sleepers in the population.
This must be exposed and stopped at all costs. There are things that must never see the light of day and the eyes of the American people, and only you can keep it hidden.
It's American heroes, like you, who must stop this terrible psyop from awakening the silent majority that could cause them to rise up in righteous indignation against the deep state masters who keep them down.
Go, Fantasywriter, go. You are the Paul Revere of our time. Stop them before they succeed in spreading the word of MAGA. This message must not be heard. Only you can save us.
Fantasy. Tell me that you understand sarcasm and that you wont quote me later as if I believe what I just wrote.
I'm trusing you on this one.
Bagster
Your sad runs deep.
I will try again to share a happy message with you.
This video will make you happy.
I hope that you can now be happy, Mrs Mith. I'm running out of bullets.
Bagster
Did you know that FR threads don't have doors and that there are no doormen?
You are goofy to take that seriously.
And a liar.
Bagster
They're pretty good, if i do say so myself and I'm always looking to get my album sales up. I wanna go platinum.
Bagster
Wow, you’re having quite the meltdown. Having your own words quoted shouldn’t bother you this much. So what if you flirt with the absurdity that Mueller is a white hat; own your words/theories proudly. If they’re good enough for the Safe Space they’re good enough for broader consumption.
More lies? Now you lie and say I'm not owning my own theories?
Bro. Nobody believes you, hard as you try.
But. Please quote me more. It makes me feel famous.
I bet nobody quotes you.
Bagster
Bagster
By the way, here you quoted me. This was me describing the discussion on the Q thread between those who believe Mueller and Comey to be either white or black hat.
So when you and your retarded brother for-q say that the Q cult all believe Mueller is a white hat, it's a lie based on your very own research that you posted. Which, of course, makes you a liar.
Science.
:)
Bagster
Me: Anyway, Ive seen them on their threads explaining that Mueller is a white hat. If you trust Sessions, he has to be.
Q-believer, posting on Friendly Q thread: ‘I feel strongly that Rosenstein is a white hat. If he is NOT, then the rest of the theory (that Trump/Sessions/Q are in control) does not hang together.
You: ‘So when you ... say that the Q cult all believe Mueller is a white hat, it’s a lie based on your very own research that you posted. Which, of course, makes you a liar.’
Typical Qer meltdown tactic: completely and totally misrepresent a Q-skeptic, and then call them a liar based solely on the wholesale misrepresentation.
Pathetic. Dishonest first and foremost, but pathetic also— and SOP for Qers.
Bagster is right.
FWIW, there have been speculations from people following Q about how Mueller fits in. There are 3 Theories:
1) Some are WONDERING if there is any kind of possibility he could be a white hat.
2) Others are adamantly in the school of thought he is black hat all the way.
3) Others are content to view him as a gray hat.
Q NEVER said in a drop “Trust Mueller.”
Bagster is lying straight up. I never said Q posted, trust Mueller, and I never said that ALL Q-followers believe Mueller is a white hat. You both have to wholesale misrepresent what I’ve posted in order to call me a liar. The dishonesty of Q-believers knows no bounds.
Bagster is not a liar. But I have not found your own posts to be very convincing.
Enjoy your spew. It will not lift you up at all.
You capture the Q MO perfectly: first lie about Q-skeptics, and when called on it respond with abusive ad hominem [the technical name for it]. Still waiting to encounter the exception to the rule.
And yes, Bagster lied. He said I posted that ALL Q-followers believe Mueller is a white hat. That never happened; it’s a wholesale lie.
Calling someone a liar isn't an insult it it's true. It's just describing what you are.
Be who you are. Be proud.
Bagster
Dance, monkey, dance.
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.