Who is #Qanon? (really interesting 19:30 video)

YouTube ^ | 4/27/2018 | Titus Frost

[Beave Meister]

This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.

[bagster]

Haha. Hey enchante, there are links to Q "proofs" you can check out. You don't have to keep debunking straw men to disprove Q. Here's how you can do the Ryan thing as it relates to Q.

Q talked about "House cleaning" then Ryan announces he resignation. Did Q have special knowledge Ryan was gonna resign. Very possible. I'm sure those kind of things are talked about at the highest level well before word gets out. But that's not the point, as you point out. Q would be pointing that out not as proof of Q, but as proof that it was made to happen for some reason.

He is narrating the struggle as it goes on in real time.

You, and all your negative nancy cohorts, are just arguing the wrong case. Every single issue to you is "proof of Q" because you so want to NOT believe that it's all you look for.

Just saying, bro. Expand your mind.

Bagster

[Fantasywriter]

Yes, but wait until you’re close to the end before making the prediction. That’s the key to Q’s ‘success’; he waits for somebody to have have one foot in the grave before vaguely indicating they’ll be murdered.

Smh.

[Enchante]

All the Gitmo stuff is some of the silliest that I have seen from the Q crowd. Supposedly Gitmo was readied months ago for a huge influx of detainees from the US citizenry. Podesta was supposed to be there already, with Hillary in an electronic ankle bracelet and so many more to follow. Why the Q followers seem to genuinely believe that Gitmo could be used for masses of US citizens (and in non-terrorism cases!) is quite a mystery. That won’t happen, for myriad legal and political reasons.

[bagster]

Q mentioned Barlow in relation to Edward Snowden. Because Barlow was a mentor and friend of Snowden and at the time, Snowden's friends were dropping like flies. Q was talking to Snowden and seemed to be attempting to turn him from a CIA asset to a cooperating white hat. To bring him in from the cold, as it were.

Taunting him with Barlow's death and insinuating that the black hats took him out and that maybe Snowden was next to prevent him from turning.

You guys really should follow this stuff before you make your uninformed cracks.

And you wonder why us Qgeniuses think you guys are ignorant. Not quite as simple as "Q predicted Barlow would die and then he died but old people die so derp." This is what I mean when I say you guys think like children.

Expand your mind.

Bagster

[bagster]

Carloada, let's dissect your post item by item, shall we? I have time for you and you deserve special attention. I would like you on the team, though you are not necessary at this point. You don't seem to possess the research or analytical skills to be very useful at this point. And your social skills are somewhat lacking. We can save you for the SHTF times. I think your skill set will be more valuable then. Am I right? Here we go.

Why do you think the pic of Obama doesn't exist? Because it hasn't come out yet? Bad logic.

Why do you think Huma wont be indicted? Because it hasn't come out in the papers? Is it possible that she WILL be indicted and Q knows it? Again, bad logic.

Why do you think a Hillary sex tape doesn't exist despite what NYC police personnel have said. Because you haven't seen it yet? Bad logic.

Do you know who the child is pictured with Obama? Research it. Does it PROVE Obama is involved in pedo rings? No. Does it suggest he might or at least have knowledge of them? Yes. Again. you use bad logic.

Was Podesta in Gitmo? Is it possible he and/or his brother were picked up, taken there, interrogated and released on his own recognizance? Yes. Likely? Who knows. Well, Podesta knows and anybody that allegedly picked him up knows. If it really happened and Q is what he is said to be, then Q also knows. Same with Hillary's bracelet. Possible? Yes.

Now ask yourself this? Did Q actually say all these things? or just point to them with questions, pictures, etc. Are some of these things theories made up by anons or others? Yes.

So, carloada. Stop debunking as if you were a child. Expand your mind.

Bagster

[bagster]

t won’t happen, for myriad legal and political reasons.

Don't be so sure of that, Enchante. If you were q Q bird, you would be aware of several Executive Orders Trump signed clearing the way for military tribunals of American citizens for explicitly listed crimes. You aren't so you don't. I'm assuming you speak out of ignorance, so you can be forgiven. Also, just today, work was completed on renovating Gitmo. I think I read something on that today or yesterday.

Anyway. There's so much you people don't know because you don't dig deep enough to know. Then you spout off like everything is ridiculous and why would anybody say such malarkey. Well, lots of smart people say it for a reason. Check it out. Expand your knowledge base and your thinking.

Bagster

[bagster]

t’s the key to Q’s ‘success’;

Well, at least you admit that Q is a success.

y steps.

Bagster

[bagster]

until now, I had no idea you conduct serious discussions.

(missed this)

That's because you don't read the Q threads. I give back as I receive. If I see my belief system mocked and disrespected, I will not turn the other cheek respond kindly. So, this thread was a cluster eff of Q mockery and disrespect. So I responded in kind. I am capable of respectful dialogue. But only respectable people get it. It is a gift I bestow only upon the deserving.

:)

Bagster

[edzo4]

no wonder you are lost with Q, you don’t even know how to use google you stupid troll

So day before NYC Bombing Q mention false flag, fireworks, and BDT which BTW is Bangledesh currency

326
Dec 10 2017 326
Blunt & Direct Time.
False flag(s).
POTUS 100% insulated.
Expect fireworks.
JUSTICE.
Q

Day of the bombing Q directs attention to the previous days post before the bomb.

327
Dec 11 2017
Do you believe in coincidences?
“Blunt & Direct Time”
BDT.
Think currency.
Think fireworks.
Thwarted.
Message delivered.
These people are sick!
Q

Just coincidence a Bangladesh terrorist sets off a pipe bomb made from fireworks in the NYC subway the day after right?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/11/new-york-police-respond-reports-explosion-inmanhattan/

DEC 11
New York subway bomb: Bangladeshi suspect ‘was inspired by Isil Christmas attacks’

http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/us-and-world-news/incident-in-times-square-subway-station

DEC 11 2017

NEW YORK (FOX5NY) - A man set off an explosive device that was strapped on his body in the subway system in the Times Square area during the busy Monday morning rush-hour commute, severely injuring himself but only causing a few other minor injuries.

Investigators say the device was ignited with a Christmas light, matches and a nine-volt battery. The short pipe was filled with some sort of explosive powder but did not explode the pipe as intended.

NOW FOR THE REAL FUN, WATCHING YOU SQUIRM, TWIST, DISTORT AND DISTRACT TO TRY AND JUSTIFY YOUR IGNORANCE

[Enchante]

WOW, you really are a cracked pot. So what about an ISIS inspired Bangladeshi terrorist blowing himself up (partially) is a “false flag” attack delivering a “message” from Adam Schiff and co.???

[Enchante]

And how was the attack “thwarted”??? Nothing was “thwarted” — the guy got into a NYC subway tunnel with a bomb, which then went off. The fact that he was an amateur and didn’t make a very reliable bomb doesn’t mean the attack was “thwarted.”

[corlorde]

You are seeing what you want, the Q.M.O. The burden of proof is on Q. Not on me, or you. Vague BS on 4chan and then on on 8chan is amusing, but means little.

[corlorde]

Possible, likely, could be, yadda yadda. Ghosts, bigfoot, UFO’s, Q.... Like I said it is amusing, but it isn’t anything.

[corlorde]

If I see my belief system mocked and disrespected, I will not turn the other cheek respond kindly.

Now we are getting somewhere. Like I said all along, it is a belief system (cultlike, with its own "special" language). An amusing one, but a faith based "system".

[Fantasywriter]

You bet it’s a belief system. On two different occasions when I said something the Qers interpreted as being disrespectful, they asked me how I would feel if someone mocked Christianity. Not making this up—it actually happened. Plus they in fact urge each other to trust the plan, trust Q, etc. It’s off the rails.

[Fantasywriter]

The story of the thwarted bomb is bizarre. It sounds like Qers are saying that Q & co knew about the bomb in advance, sneaked in and sabotaged the works, and then allowed the guy to try to ignite it. That kind of theory makes flat earthers sound rational.

[Enchante]

Yeah, that’s a bizarre one. Every time I have tried to track down a “Q” belief that is not already completely obvious and well known, it turns out to be something that is either highly speculative or utterly irrational.

[Enchante]

Wellllll I am well aware of some of the updates both physical and policy oriented wrt Guantanamo Bay, and that there have been several Trump EOs of interest. However, Gitmo as a prison (subsequent to the military base) has always been specifically authorized for “War on Terror” detainees who are judged to be “enemy combatants.”

Outside of “Martial Law” (which is not going to happen in the USA in any forseeable context) there is no provision for trying US citizen civilians under military tribunals. You can’t just round up accused pedos, human traffickers, Deep State apparatchiks, et al. and ship them off to Gitmo for military tribunals. You guys really do want a “banana republic” here??? It ain’t happening. These cases will be dealt with in civilian courts within the USA, and of course we all hope there will be a lot more prosecutions soon.

If anyone proposed sending prisoners there who were NOT “enemy combatants” related to terrorism, captured overseas, it would be an enormous political and legal controversy. COngress (both parties) would go nuts, whether you like it or not. I doubt very much it will ever happen. All the storm and drama on “Q” threads does not amount to real policy or to real impending events at Gitmo, which has not received new prisoners in many years.

Every time Q folks claim super duper secret knowledge my b.s. detector goes off. Show us something real, not just what has been discussed uncritically on the Q threads.

[Enchante]

re: “House cleaning” there have been numerous Republican congresscritters over MONTHS announcing that they are not running for re-election. Q referring to any “House cleaning” in no way predicts the specific resignation of Ryan... although as I have said, I have expected Ryan’s resignation or withdrawal of candidacy since long before Q came on the scene. Ryan barely agreed to accept the Speaker position and made it clear at the time that he might not be long for the job, for personal/family reasons. Long ago he made public statements that he was greatly concerned about not being around for his kids growing up and that he was sick of the time/burdens of political life. This was not a case of some “forced” resignation with the usual “spending more time with family” veneer. In the case of Ryan he had been telling colleagues for YEARS that he was headed in this direction.

[Enchante]

"One of the biggest examples off the top of my head is North Korea. We knew about Trump meeting with Kim in the forbidden city and making a deal with him weeks before any word of it came out."

That is still complete speculation and extremely extremely unlikely. POTUS Trump was only in Beijing for around 24 hrs and had an extremely packed schedule with the Chinese leaders. There has been zero evidence that Kim Jong Un slipped into China at that time, we have only Q's "word" for it.

Also, the whole process of any "deal" between the USA and NK has been much more halting and tentative than your comments suggest. Is it "possible" that there is some super duper top secret deal that has already been wrapped up from a secret meeting btw Trump and Kim Jong Un in Nov. 2017???? Well zillions of things are "possible" but there has been zero public evidence of this, and much indication to the contrary.

Public statements from Trump, Pompeo, NK, SK, and the Chinese have NOT given any evidence that Trump and Kim ever met or that there is ANY definite deal on the table between the USA and NK. Yes, Kim tells SK he is ready to talk peace and denuclearize, but we may be very far from any verifiable, comprehensive deal. POTUS Trump has indicated that all the details remain to be seen. So we don't really know if there will be a deal or not. NK could be playing more deceptive games, as they have many times in the past. The signs are hopeful that they understand that they cannot get away with b.s. toward POTUS Trump, but the Q-team claims that there was any secret meeting between Trump and Kim and/or that there has been any firm and complete deal between Trump and Kim are, so far, complete and utter speculation ... aka..... smoke, blowing smoke.

I'd say the chances that Trump has already met with Kim are vanishingly small to zero. If anyone has any evidence to the contrary they should present it. So far, we have only Q's words, not any EVIDENCE.