Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Truer words re Q were never spoken. Whatever happens, regardless of what happens, supports Q in the eyes of the believers. More to the point, everything that *doesn’t* happen increases their conviction in the legitimacy of Q. Two words spoken by a Qer explain everything (to themselves) that would otherwise undermine the Q narrative:
Kabuki.
4DChess.
How can you disagree with me if you have no earthly idea what I believe? If someone offered you a billion dollars to articulate—without looking up my past posts—what I believe, you’d be out an easy billion.
I'll take a shot.
What if Xi and Trump made a deal regarding continuing trade and other considerations. What if Trump escalated the confrontation of Chinese expansionism in the South China Sea and in Asia overall. What if Xi brokered a meeting between Rocket Man and The Donald in the Forbidden City where the deal was done, as some believe.
See, Fantasy. You got go pay attention and have an open mind. Then you can cipher stuff out and not ask such childish, uninformed questions.
The NK deal was done a while back. All that dribbling out in the media you need for your confirmations has been set up already. The rest is for show and people like you.
Bagster
Wrote a song about it, like to hear it? Here it go.
Haha. You're adorable, FW.
Fantasywriter Tubbs unplugged.
Bagster
I call your billion and raise you 188 trillion.
The foundation of your entire belief system is the sure knowledge that you, and you alone, are privy to the truth. You have a false sense of intellectual superiority which does not allow for other ways of thinking or opinions.
This is common in the flat earth, NeverQ, science denying community.
Pay up.
Bagster
“...Mark Bradman contingent...”
Never heard of him - but I do get your insulting inference that I can’t think for myself - I must be a blind follower of “Q”, or some other contingent because I disagree with you.
I’m not playing for your dumb strawman game, my opinion of Xi does not matter, I asked you a question first why do you lie and claim you don’t care about Q when any body who wants to look at your posts would see it is the majority of what you comment about on virtually every thread?
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:fantasywriter/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
Does Hillary cpac still pay you,
But again why did we know about NK since November and you just found out now?
29
Nov 1 2017 01:13:10 (EST) Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL 147452214
Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, hes an actor in the play. Who is the director? The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.
38
Nov 2 2017
Four carriers & escorts in the pacific?
Why is that relevant?
To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?
Or conversely all for NK? Or all three.
Think logically about the timing of everything happening.
39
Nov 2 2017 01:14:27 (EST) Anonymous ID: pGukiFmX 147588085
Would it blow your mind if I told you BO has been to NK and perhaps there now?
Why did his administration do little to slow their nuclear and missle capabilities?
Who feeds NK w/ strategic intel? Iran?
What deal was done with Iran under BO?
Why was the deal sealed under a top secret classification?
Why wasnt Congress notified?
Why after BO left office all of a sudden NK has nukes and the tech to miniaturize for payload delivery within the US?
What about NSA CIA DI etc all confirming tech wont be in place for 5+ years (statements made in 2016).
Why is all of this relevant and what does it tell you?
Big picture is rare.
Oh please. If your skin is that thin, give it up. The hyper-defensiveness routine got old.
‘my opinion of Xi does not matter’
Exactly. Q has convinced you that every time Trump says anything it’s, ‘kabuki theater.’ Otherwise you’d understand that Xi matters.
Said the raven to the crow.
Did you really just say that?
Bagster
I see you avoided the question again liar...
why did we know about North Korea since November and you just found out Now?
29
Nov 1 2017 01:13:10 (EST) Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL 147452214
Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, hes an actor in the play. Who is the director? The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.
38
Nov 2 2017
Four carriers & escorts in the pacific?
Why is that relevant?
To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?
Or conversely all for NK? Or all three.
Think logically about the timing of everything happening.
39
Nov 2 2017 01:14:27 (EST) Anonymous ID: pGukiFmX 147588085
Would it blow your mind if I told you BO has been to NK and perhaps there now?
Why did his administration do little to slow their nuclear and missle capabilities?
Who feeds NK w/ strategic intel? Iran?
What deal was done with Iran under BO?
Why was the deal sealed under a top secret classification?
Why wasnt Congress notified?
Why after BO left office all of a sudden NK has nukes and the tech to miniaturize for payload delivery within the US?
What about NSA CIA DI etc all confirming tech wont be in place for 5+ years (statements made in 2016).
Why is all of this relevant and what does it tell you?
Big picture is rare.
Liar. He didn't say Xi didn't matter. He said his opinion on Xi didn't matter.
See how you weave your lies and base your arguments on a foundation of lies?
You are an incorrigible liar, Fantasywriter. Just incorrigible.
p.s. Read my post on Xi for the answer to your stupid question. I knew the story of Xi a long time ago. I didn't have to wait to watch it on CNN.
Bagster
Didn’t click.
I asked you a fundamentally pertinent and crucial question twice. You have yet to answer. Your questions came AFTER mine. The person evading the question is you.
Don't believe her. She likes to pretend she didn't read or didn't click. It's just another lie in a long list of lies in this "fully reformed liberal's" (see her profile page for further information) bag of tricks.
p.s. You better re-ping your backup, FW. This isn't working out well for you.
Bagster
Troll trick #17:
Projection/Reflection.
Try not to make it so obvious, FW.
Bagster
Wrong again liar, you asked my opinion about Xi< I answered, I don’t have one
I asked you two factual questions; why do you lie and claim you care not about Q when you spend all day every day obsessed over it?
and second why did we know about North Korea months ago and you just found out now?,
Thanks for playing troll...
Naw, I said I enjoy seeing it discussed. It's the most
entertaining part of the Q threads. Sadly, it's been showing up
less and less. I lose interest with all the back and forth over
Mueller and Sessions. It's mildly interesting when a picture of
some third-rate poultry shop in Hyderabad shows up and three
hundred posts get burned up in wild speculation about it's significance
but like the Godzilla movie... I want to see the monsters.
There is quite a lot of evidence to suggest that pedophilia , occultism, and sex trafficking on a grand scale has been and is taking place on an international scale by the elites of the world.
I've seen a great deal of speculation and sensational bloggy-junk
about it but nothing really substantial, at least not that I've seen.
Even if I bought into any of it, discussion would be pointless
as I know no pedophiles, damned few "elites" and even fewer politicians.
It would be a discussion of opinion, not of facts.
I would even petition Q to grant you a pardon and a shortened probationary period for your blasphemy.
That's mighty white of you and I'll keep it in mind.
In large part I've elected to leave the Q threads alone not because
of any sense of altruism but because some of my personal friends
are on there and I'd hate to spoil their fun. Believe it or not,
my mere presence can be disruptive even when I'm on my "more gooder"
behavior. So tell brer Q I may beg his pardon at sometime in the
future should I start feeling more contrite. Or something.
I don't keep a posse of snitches in my entourage, neither.
That's good to know. It's hell managing a proper entourage.
‘you asked my opinion about Xi’
No, I did not ask your opinion of Xi. I never asked that. But here is a paraphrase to make it clearer:
Why, completely apart from your personal opinion, was Xi’s help essential to fundamentally shortening the time and lessening the effort required to achieve a breakthrough in Korea?
Look upthread for my reasons for posting here.
Is what you think you know about the REASON for the Korean breakthrough accurate? To answer that question first requires an answer to the Xi question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.