Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
He did not say trust Mueller, just Sessions. He ask a bunch of questions about Mueller, his background and timeline that made people question who Mueller is working for but also has pointed out his very corrupt background.
Here’s an example of the official Q threads, on which I don’t post:
‘Q Anon: (5/2/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration’
If you think it’s okay for skeptics to post on those threads, it’s only because you’re not a skeptic.
‘Another way of looking at it is that it’s a psyop and that it’s working very effectively on you.’
What an amazing comment. What it says is that you’ve never read a single post by anyone who believes, as I do, that Q is a Deep State psyops. Well no wonder, then; if you’ve only absorbed views that reinforce your confirmation bias, of course that’s the view you embrace.
"...and turn again and rend you."
But I love it when that happens. The turning, that is. The rending I have never experienced. :)
Bagster
Bol!
‘Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire.’
Lol—no, I won’t forget this one. One of the Qers demanded to know whether, if this photo is released, I’d become a Q-follower.
So far...ahem...the question is moot.
I don’t hate Sessions. But I have been guilty of forgetting about the Mark Bradman contingent. Sorry to have confused the two; I’ll make the distinction in the future.
Why would Xi have been crucial to cutting the CIA strings? Put another way, how could Xi have made the process of cutting CIA strings significantly shorter and quicker?
No kidding. I always hated the Raymond Burr parts. Bring on the puppet, I always said.
Hey Bubble. Remember when you and I first clashed and you were all like, "Hey, are you stalking me? You must be my number one fan, kek." Remember that? I think we have come full circle, my obnoxious FRiend.
Anyway, like I explained to FW (who I think is sweet on old Bags), I don't mind. And the good news is, I don't keep a posse of snitches in my entourage, neither.
So it's baby raping and sex slavery you want to discuss? My thoughts on the subject are as follows:
There is quite a lot of evidence to suggest that pedophilia , occultism, and sex trafficking on a grand scale has been and is taking place on an international scale by the elites of the world. Maybe the Hollywood Weinstein/#Metoo thing is something more down to earth you can sink your teeth into. Start there.
I used to, like you, mock things that I didn't understand and refused to believe. I was convinced that any "out of the box" thinking was so called "conspiracy theory" and therefore ridiculed and laughed at the messenger. I was an easily led sheep and people like Hillary and her people rejoiced that I was asleep and vulnerable to their manipulations.
In other words, I was like you. I am no longer that guy. I at least am open to new information. Why don't you bone up on the pedo/sex trafficking thing before you put your slightly above average trolling skills to use in doing the deep state's work for them.
A well informed and unplugged Bubblegummer would be a valuable addition to the fight. I would even petition Q to grant you a pardon and a shortened probationary period for your blasphemy.
Bagster
The forgiving
You are simple.
Bagster
What. You're saying you don't believe?
Science denier.
Bagster
Once every ten years or so, Bubble takes a chance and actually posts an opinion and has something to say. This may be one of those times.
Pull up a chair, there may not be another sighting in your lifetime.
Bagster
I can get you one, Carloada. But first you have to pass the pledge period. Stick with me, kid. You can be my prospect until you earn your colors.
Bagster
Because we all know the CIA has never influenced other countries or leaders. They are just spies looking out for all of us. Like Maxwell Smart and James Bond.
Boy, you got it bad, BoD.
Bagster
Because you know these pics don't exist.
You must be plugged in, Carloada. Go post on 8chan. We can call you C.
Bagster
why did we know about NK since Nov and you just found out now? PS you claimed you don’t post about Q you are a liar, bye now...
29
Nov 1 2017 01:13:10 (EST) Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL 147452214
Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, hes an actor in the play. Who is the director? The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.
38
Nov 2 2017
Four carriers & escorts in the pacific?
Why is that relevant?
To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?
Or conversely all for NK? Or all three.
Think logically about the timing of everything happening.
39
Nov 2 2017 01:14:27 (EST) Anonymous ID: pGukiFmX 147588085
Would it blow your mind if I told you BO has been to NK and perhaps there now?
Why did his administration do little to slow their nuclear and missle capabilities?
Who feeds NK w/ strategic intel? Iran?
What deal was done with Iran under BO?
Why was the deal sealed under a top secret classification?
Why wasnt Congress notified?
Why after BO left office all of a sudden NK has nukes and the tech to miniaturize for payload delivery within the US?
What about NSA CIA DI etc all confirming tech wont be in place for 5+ years (statements made in 2016).
Why is all of this relevant and what does it tell you?
Big picture is rare.
41
Nov 2 2017 01:47:47 (EST) Anonymous ID: pGukiFmX 147590619
What a coincidence the mountain that housed NKs nuclear weapons and testing collapsed. Unbelievable timing. I wonder if critically important materials as well as scientists aka the bomb makers were inside when it happened. Shocking no global news agency suspects we had nothing to do with it. Enjoy the crumbs.
It may have been something else. You know how sometimes they say women attract bears?
That.
Bagster
Haha. I know. It's like all-star weekend at the Troll Olympics. It's WONDERFUL!!!!!
Runners, to your marks.
Fantasywriter gets to be Salma Hayak.
I have a question re what you posted. Here it is:
What role did Xi play that significantly shortened and made easier the process of bringing about the breakthrough in Korea?
Q usually leaves himself an out if a prediction doesn't come true. He usually uses the "60% of the corruption must remain private" excuse.
If a pic doesn't surface of Hussein holding an AK47, it won't matter to the Q believers. They will go on believing.
Don’t you have some erotica you can go write and leave the rest of us to our own ‘fantasy’?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.