[greeneyes]

I’ve heard nothing but eulogies for Barbara Bush. I’ve heard nothing about a referral for charges for HRC.

Darn right quit - if I’ve posted twice about a not so important issue, I’d like to be done with it. Clutters the thread. Should have quit sooner.

[Cboldt]

Anonymous 04/18/18 (Wed) 13:25:17 e8316b No.1090705

[flag image]

>>1090693
Q TEAM
This board has been compromised by the CIA CLOWNS
Please advise what to do
We can no longer accept Q posts here

---

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 04/18/18 (Wed) 13:29:54 42f925 No.1090773 >>1090705
Acknowledged
Advise Reddit
This board comped
Head out now
Q

[bagster]

Cheer up GE. Today is a very good day. And it's only just begun. Lots of people booty holes are puckering right about njow. All eyes on Sessions, Huber, and Wray.

I wonder, since all three were referred to, if any one, two, or all can act on their own. Or is Sessions the shotcaller. Or....will Sessions hand off to Rosenstein. These are the next things to watch for.

[generally]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3648492/posts

Check this out!!!

Criminal referral against HRC, Comey, Lynch! (Is that like charges?)

[EarlyBird]

No, greeneyes, please don’t quit. I noticed something in part of your post:

Q/D
Jan 07 2018 22:44:09 Q !UW.yye1fxo 21093
Original [15] min
DEFCON [1]
CONF Revised [1] min
Coincidence?
Q

Q/E
Jan 07 2018 22:44:09 Q !UW.yye1fxo 21093
Original [15] min
DEFCON [1] CONF
Revised [1] min
Coincidence?
Q

If DEFCON means “definitely confirmed”, why does Q also use CONF right next to it?

CONF would mean “confirmed” wouldn’t it? Why does Q need two “confirmed”s in the same clause?

Your post may lead to uncovering a totally different meaning for DEFCON, one that no one has yet guessed!

So don’t stop!