Posted on 03/28/2018 7:15:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump
Okay. Whats Okalala. Is that the town in Nebraska from Lonesome Dove?
BRAVO!!!!!!!!
good head of steam, ransomnote!!!!
As I said, I haven’t made up my mind. I don’t KNOW him, and I haven’t read a lot about him. There are NO news sources that I consider trustworthy.
So it takes a whole lot of effort and research before I make up my mind. You want to love the guy-feel free.
So far he seems more like just another Deep State plant to try and sully Trump. I sure as heck wouldn’t elevate him to a Patriot like Flynn’s level without knowing more. And at this point, he’s not on my list of items to research.
For the record, I don’t consider resume enhancement to be a felony or anything like an attack. It was intended as a brief summation of what I had just read about him.
Now, please talk to someone else about him. I have already wasted more time discussing him than I wanted to. DONE
Who are you accusing of being a troll now, princess?
Yes he was
And, yet another key aspect is when they talk (post) to themselves.
man, she really had a way with words!!!!
The fact that you have it on hand after 7 years concerns me, tho... do you keep it on hand to remind yourself to be +humble+ or +nimble+??????
:)
You’re trying too hard, it gives you away.
You know I’m not a woman. Look how many times you made reference to it in this post. Your whole point was to make it seem like you didn’t know I’m a man. How obvious can you get. Then at the end you ask innocently, “oh, one more thing, tell me how I insulted you.”
Truth be known, the passive aggressive behavior you’ve demonstrated here is a strongly feminine trait.
If anyone believes my post could damage the cause, then we are on very shaky ground.
LoL about someone who has not been disparaged in any way that I can see. It’ all become amusement now.
Not working.
Another thing you guys need to look at is the exaggeration and sarcasm meant to be an ad hominem, like in your post you said “You want to love the guy-feel free.” This is over the top in its irrelevance, and it makes you look like you’re not serious about the topic at hand.
All of you do it, and it kind of gives you away. A little free advice.
my gr-uncle was made an honorary Sioux after he successfully defended a Sioux who got soused and killed a soldier at the fort. The gov’t had to bring him in from Upstate cuz no one out there would defend a ‘lyin stinkin drunken Indian’. :0
See what I mean? You wouldn’t call someone “princess” in a derogatory context unless it was a guy you’re trying to insult. You have to think more nuanced if you’re going to make it in your line of work.
Explain the logic of your assertion.
And be more smarter on the "who is Q" thing. From pathetic dumb, obviously wrong ones like Theil to even any others. Our job is not to burn a covered operative and ruin the Q movement. And certainly not to get the President impeached by identifying a close government associate as leaking state secrets with his authorization.
And also learn what the definition of "cuck" and "cuckservative" is. It is certainly not racist, either in it's original form nor in it's current usage. It was reborn as a way to accuse supposedly strong "conservatives" of bowing down to a weaker opponent. To be shamed.
There is also a porn use of the term (Don't ask me how I know this. Okay, I'll tell ya. I saw a documentary on it on youtube)
There is a whole category of it called Cuckold porn a strain of which features black men and white women. It's where men get off on watching their women do things with their wives. Dirty things, if you catch my drift.
The ANTIFAS, enemies of the right, used "cuck is racist" as a lyung tactic to turn the alt right into Nazis. Just like they did with pepe the frog, the kek flag, and everything else.
So either you were duped by their propaganda, or you ignorantly or knowingly believe the same as they do. Either way, you are wrong and are helping the enemy. Tighten up your thinking cap, goodman.
The end, unless you would like further discussion.
I keep around as a laugh, an exceptional specimen of heartfelt but worthless venting and noise.
Guess I have to rehost that "Here lies cboldt / RIP" tombstone image, photobucket having revised linkage terms.
Okay Okay, everyone calm down.
Reasonisfaith, I don’t think Bags insulted you. No one thinks he insulted you. But now you’re accusing everyone and insulting them.
How the H would he know if your a female or male? He calls all of us princess untel we tell him different.
I meant to just get on here and tell you that we didn’t respond to your posts about Corsi and Thiel etc., because we went thru that last night and it wasn’t very consuming.
It’s the same night shift here lately, so we don’t bother each other.
I would really like to have a conversation with the supervisors of these deep state trolls. Not necessarily the ones at the very top because they’re not actually the brightest, which might come as a surprise but it’s true. Usually somewhere in the high middle there might be one or two who can really hold their own—those are the ones I’d like to have a word with on this forum. The ones paid by the hour are just not challenging enough.
Oh the good old days! Epic battles were more fun than stuff that happens with the crazies these days.
And who could ever forget LuLu’s opus and the thread that wouldn’t die... LoL good times!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.