Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/25/2018 5:07:22 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Signalman

I thought this was a done deal.


2 posted on 03/25/2018 5:10:18 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Why is it only our side that has to concern itself with conflicts?
Rats never recuse Rats never resign.


3 posted on 03/25/2018 5:11:19 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman
Jay Sekulow is the straightest of arrows. If he says it, it’s right.
4 posted on 03/25/2018 5:14:56 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Conflicts of interest apparently only apply to lawyers who want to defend Trump; they are waived for lawyers who are trying to bring him down.


6 posted on 03/25/2018 5:15:28 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

This fills in the blanks. No problem...


7 posted on 03/25/2018 5:15:58 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

>>don’t believe the Fake News narrative that it is hard to find a lawyer who wants to take this on,”

How CAN a lawyer refuse service to a client?

Bake the DAMN cake.


11 posted on 03/25/2018 5:22:43 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Wear an orange pin to mourn the victims of the Tide Pods Challenge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

I don’t believe this. I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure if the client is notified of the conflict then the client can waive that. In this case Trump. I think this is just a save face excuse because he spoke to them and didn’t think they were the right attorneys. JMO


13 posted on 03/25/2018 5:30:47 PM PDT by SoCar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Conflicts don’t seem to apply to Mueller or his team.


15 posted on 03/25/2018 5:36:50 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (What profits a man if he gains the world yet loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Train Wreck.


18 posted on 03/25/2018 5:48:23 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Kind of an organization or attorney doesn’t check for that before they go and say yes? That’s a little bit beyond embarrassing. The better Of him.


20 posted on 03/25/2018 5:53:53 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Impeach Trump? Sure, let's discuss. VP Pence is standing by.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

There was no Trump Russian Collusion so how can there be a conflict in any way whatsoever? Wait, let me guess. Joseph diGenova once watched Sputnik fly through the sky when he was a kid.


31 posted on 03/25/2018 6:40:39 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Another ficken recusal.


34 posted on 03/25/2018 7:05:37 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

“Jay Sekulow, counsel to the president”.

Boy did I miss or forget that that’s where Jay is now. I think that’s great, and I now I see where the Trump team is getting good help coming up with good judicial candidates.

When I saw that one statement I quoted, I said Wow, great!!!


40 posted on 03/26/2018 7:53:18 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson