Maybe it can drive my car too...
Posted on 03/21/2018 5:49:59 AM PDT by C19fan
On 23 May 2014, Elliot Rodger, a 22-year-old college dropout, became the world’s most famous ‘incel’ – involuntary celibate. The term can, in theory, be applied to both men and women, but in practice it picks out not sexless men in general, but a certain kind of sexless man: the kind who is convinced he is owed sex, and is enraged by the women who deprive him of it. Rodger stabbed to death his two housemates, Weihan Wang and Cheng Hong, and a friend, George Chen, as they entered his apartment on Seville Road in Isla Vista, California. Three hours later he drove to the Alpha Phi sorority house near the campus of UC Santa Barbara. He shot three women on the lawn, killing two of them, Katherine Cooper and Veronika Weiss. Rodger then went on a drive-by shooting spree through Isla Vista, killing Christopher Michaels-Martinez, also a student at UCSB, with a single bullet to the chest inside a Deli Mart, and wounding 14 others. He eventually crashed his BMW coupé at an intersection. He was found dead by the police, having shot himself in the head.
(Excerpt) Read more at lrb.co.uk ...
But the sex-positive gaze, unmoored from Willis’s call to ambivalence, threatens to neutralise these facts, treating them as pre-political givens. In other words, the sex-positive gaze risks covering not only for misogyny, but for racism, ableism, transphobia, and every other oppressive system that makes its way into the bedroom through the seemingly innocuous mechanism of ‘personal preference’.
Personal preferences regarding dating and what to hit is a political statement too. This seems to be growing movement. For example, transphobia being charged against heteros refusing to sleep the the T in LGBT
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/
???
Ask around.
There are wives who puposely deny their spouse sex.
There are women who weaponize sex and the word “no”.
It doesn’t validate any action against the aggressor.
How can a right force another party to provide a service?
Sounds like a Muslim.
From my cold dead hands..........................
I DO!
Line up girls...
A right does not require consent and consent does not make right.
A prominent homosexual advocate has already insinuated that an ideological opponent of his should be b^tt raped.
So, yes, the sexual anarchy lobby does believe in the “right to have sex.”
Is that with or without a partner ?
It’s quite simple, really. The exercise of a right does not involve potentially, or actually, compelling another individual to do something for you or give something to you. So no, no one has a right to sex.
What a stupid attitude.Nobody on earth is entitled to sex any more than they entitled to the right time of day.
Go ahead and tell God He screwed up.
I promise you a miserable life.
The fixation on the orgasm is destroying society.
Maybe it can drive my car too...
I’d be worried about some of my more personal parts getting caught up in the wires and gears.
The male model didn't sell, looked too much like Swartzenneger...
Yes, he had a right to sex. Or a left, depending on which hand he preferred.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.