Q Anon: (3/20/18) Continued from Sunday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/20/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[ransomnote]

The picture is taken from Q drop #531. This chess game (i.e., Capablanca Vs Marshal 1918) is a favorite of mine; before Q Anon, I never HAD a favorite chess game. This chess match, played 100 years ago, illustrates a battle in which all hope seems lost, defeat is assured, and then the nearly extinguished enact an unanticipated defensive strategy that wins the game. Sound like anyone we know? :) Among chess players (i.e., not me) some say that match was "beautiful" and "among the 3 finest chess games played in history." At the time of this Q drop, Julian Assange tweeted about this winning strategy and Q Anon seemed to echo with a Q drop of the same famous winning strategy in reply. Some of us believed at the time that it signified a critical win; white defeated the "Black Queen".

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

[STARLIT]

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/03/21/facebook-execs-may-appear-on-capitol-hill-to-address-data-exploitation.html

It remains to be seen which Facebook official will appear on Capitol Hill. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has been under fire for remaining silent on the issue and not speaking out in what appears to be the biggest scandal rocking the company since its founding over a decade ago.

U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., is calling for Zuckerberg to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The CEO reportedly snubbed his employees at Tuesday’s internal briefing on the data leak and did not show up.

“The Committee has repeatedly asked Facebook about how companies acquire and hold on to user data from their site, and in particular about whether data had been taken without their consent,” Damian Collins, chair of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, wrote in a letter to Zuckerberg.

[Swordmaker]

The upshot of the Q skit/Matrix equivalency is that believing Q’s authenticity is (cue ominous music) “ DANDEROUS! “ for the millions of delusional people who are falling for it!

Of course they couched every thing they showed—out-of-context snippets decoding them with the kookiest interpretations, and called the investigators “bakers,” as if we autists called ourselves that, based on “crumbs” being reassembled into the full cake—in the worst possible light. . . all with snide asides. It’s an attempt to inoculate anyone from even considering investigating Q, to head them away from even consider looking with an open mind.

[No_Doll_i]

That is one lameass website.

[UCANSEE2]

Can you put a post JUST PRIOR to the DEFINITIONS post which jumps to a post JUST AFTER the DEFINITIONS post ?

Use a link to the thread and change the #PAGE NUMBER to the next higher number.

For instance, on this thread. The JUMP PAST link would have been post 5. The DEFINITIONS would be 6. The JUMP TO link would be 7.

SO... in post 5 you would have the link... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3641292/posts?q=1&;page=7

It could be tricky if someone managed to get in another post before you could input those 3 posts (actually, you wouldn’t even have to post a third one) so it would need to be done ASAP after the original thread is created.

[bagster]

Yep. Looks like it. I think this RT is exactly that guy. Real time and Tillerson make NO sense. This guy bears watching and putting on our radar, for sure.

[Califreak]

No, but I thought it might be worth mentioning.

[Steven W.]

Interesting ... I’m now leaning to RT being Real Time again in this set. So it’s Zuck & others (including Brennan?) having a panic attack in a secret (west coast?) meeting ... and “Q” has the secret sauce (algorithm) and the pressure was turned up on May ;)

[Spitzensparkin1]

Rivzi Traverse = RT?

Rizvi Traverse Management, managed by secretive investor Suhail Rizvi, dumps half its shares in Twitter...

http://fortune.com/2016/08/12/twitter-square-rizvi/

[No_Doll_i]

Thanks Califreak, I was just joshing ya! ;-)

[No_Doll_i]

Man that was torture!

[bagster]

Can you put a post JUST PRIOR to the DEFINITIONS post which jumps to a post JUST AFTER the DEFINITIONS post ?

I cant make heads or tales of this solution, but whatever workds. I have to admit, swordy, that your lexicon posts in the middle of a thread are kinda a pain in the ass. What if you just posted the latest revisions and provided a link to the entire list? I think the revisions are important for everybody to see as you make them, but if we want to see the entire list we can go to the link. And the revision posts with a link would serve to remind people of the list.

Whaddya think?

[Steven W.]

Here is something else funny + MSM narrative shift from this past weekend: SNL's Robert Mueller breaks up with Trump collusion probe in 'The Bachelor' spoof
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, portrayed by Kate McKinnon in a “Saturday Night Live” skit that riffed on ABC’s “The Bachelor,” made the tough decision to pursue President Trump on obstruction charges rather than collusion with the Russian government — to a heartbroken voter’s dismay.
“The reality is that I don’t think I can give you everything that you want right now,” said McKinnon, mashing her Mueller impression with the sought-after candidate in “The Bachelor.”
The cold open Saturday night depicted the independent prosecutor performing the inevitable breakup from the reality series. The woman vying for his love was replaced with Cecily Strong as a voter longing for Trump’s impeachment.
She was under the impression the indictment of 13 Russians and revelations of a secret meeting between a Trump supporter and Russian businessman in Seychelles meant something to their budding relationship.
Mueller broke the news that he was “only half in with collusion” and that he had his mind on prosecuting the President for obstruction of justice instead.

[bagster]

Suhail Rizvi, dumps half its shares in Twitter...

Hmmmmm...

Panic mode.
Enjoy the show.
Q

[Swordmaker]

...to serial trip Secretary Clinton.
Eh?

HRC tripped twice on those stairs in India. . . must be a conspiracy to trip her. Obviously can’t be her fault, now can it? Nothing is ever HER fault.

[Steven W.]

That’s a good RT connection - down she goes could also refer to TWTR + FB share price when the insider selling is recognized.

[No_Doll_i]

I read a story a couple of days ago (I forget where) that MZ was taking money out of FB for some new venture. It did not say what the venture was exactly. I’ll search my history to see if I can recall it.

[Swordmaker]

If this was already discussed, pardon me.

I am late to the party.

Not late, just a great mind working consecutively to other great mind’s. We’ve just added it to the Lexicon a few minutes ago. Thanks though.

[Califreak]

I knew that.

:)

[No_Doll_i]

From a Market Watch article.

“Facebook spokeswoman Vanessa Chan said in an email that the stock sales are intended to fund the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, the philanthropic investment organization the Facebook founder set up with his wife in 2015. In an SEC filing, Zuckerberg said that he plans to sell at least $6 billion in Facebook stock to fund the organization’s efforts.”

Cover for selling shares was my immediate thought. Still is.

[bagster]

...and called the investigators “bakers,” as if we autists called ourselves that, . .

I thought the anons called themselves "bakers" with pride. And I'm not an autist. I'm a cool kid with a smidge of nerd thrown in. Just a smidge, mind you.

It’s an attempt to inoculate anyone from even considering investigating Q, to head them away from even consider looking with an open mind.

Yes, this is their intent. I put forward that this is bad strategy on their part. If they make Q a commonly known thing, more people will look into it. If the cool kids (like us) are seen to believe in it, that will give the sheep pause. The more cool kids on the Q train, the better. Right? The lefty sheep are already against us so F them. We are after the uninformed.