Because men are usually better leaders....
Pretending that women are the same as men, then looking for proof of bias by looking for evidence that people don’t all agree with you.
Yeah, that’s effective proof of... ?
I can tell you who I don’t picture as a leader.
No, of course not, why would it be?
I’ve been working full-time since 1979. I’ve had 6 different careers by my count. Lots of companies. Lots of industries. In all that time, almost all of my bosses were women.
Never had a good female boss. Never. Leadership seems an uncommon trait in females. I have had, I believe 5 males bosses. Only 1 of the men lacked leadership ability. The other 4 were very good.
That’s my anecdotal input. (By the way, I’ve been the boss many times. I’m told I’m good at it.)
In all of recorded history, a "female leader" of anything consequential is extremely difficult to find.
Oh there are a few; however, how many were actually successful ON THEIR OWN, sans either riding the coat tails of some man; or successful at the end?
Bodeaca fought the Roman army, but in the end, she LOST the war.
Theodosia was smarter than her husband, but wouldn't have any say so on her own.
Queen Elizabeth I was GREAT; rare exception.
Should we count Joan of Arc? Yes, she was a successful "leader"; however, when all was said & done, her side LOST and she was denounced, tried, and burned at the stake.
Catherine the Great wouldn't have had any power at all, if she hadn't married a Czar and then refused to remarry; not that her reign was anything to shout about.
Queen Victoria was also a marvelous "LEADER" ( though she didn't have a whole lot of power ) on her own.
Maggie Thatcher was GREAT!
Florence Nightingale was a true "leader" and ahead of her time.
Oh sure, some women, throughout history have been as intelligent/more intelligent than men, and very clever; but, were not "leaders" of anything at all.
When all is said and done...of course people see men as "leaders"; it's only natural!
Ummm, not this one.
It is sad that wrong headed thinking maintains that natural law can be rewritten to equate the female species to male prowess. One only needs to look across the animal world to understand the natural arrangement of male and female. Try as they might, the revisionists can not change this natural law. Bottom line: Male and female are not the same and no amount of strained rhetoric can make it so.
If I picture a leader it sure as hell isn’t Hillary falling down stairs or thrown into a scooby van like a side of beef.
This guy nails it! Mark Gungor - Men’s Brain Women’s Brain
Men and women are not equal. We are complimentary.
I think in general men are more focused and better leaders, women are more able to apply emptions to situations. There is plusses and minuses to that. (Although Hillary just said all white women are too stupid to vote without asking their husband, boss or brothers. And they wonder why she lost?????)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BxckAMaTDc
I “might” draw Margaret Thatcher, possibly Deborah of Bible fame. That is it. I do not want a woman leader.
Elizabeth I was the first person to come to my mind.
It depends on what she’s leading and who is being lead.
Only two genders? What happened to the rest?
Mope.
Too self centered.
Maggie Thatcher, Golda Meir? Hell yes.
So when asked this, say “Yes, I picture Margaret Thatcher” (or similar) and you will hear the libs yell and screech.
Ok, is that bad?
Male leaders?
That seems like the gold standard to me.