Q Anon: (3/16/18) Continued from Tuesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/16/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This is a shout out to all the Anons who have worked so hard for months on the Q boards to bake Q's drops for us. THANQ, Anons!.

The Q team doesn't like it when they receive praise, but hey, they don't have time to read websites (FR) and besides, they can't stop me!

THANQ, Q!!!!
It just needed to be said.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3639519/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

[saywhatagain]

Good job blogger for posting. Whitelist . . . another rabbit hole.LoL

Jocko, magical to us "after" much beer was incoherent. went from tapes or evidence of satan worshipping to after the first two BOOM's it would appear we are going down a s4$#hole and the last BOOM brings everything together, just like magic

[greeneyes]

AMEN.

[Blogger]

That sounds reasonable. Enjoy your final days of freedom Crooked Hillary. They won’t last.

[Bodleian_Girl]

Are you guys seeing the Samantha Powers beat down on Twitter?

[saywhatagain]

I think . . . don’t know, Q is answering some of the Anons because many were pissed she was out and about. With her traveling like that, it kinda discredited some of Q’s earlier posts. Going down the Whitelist rabbit hole.

[bagster]

Must be something with my unit,

That's what she said.

[greeneyes]

I don’t know a lot about pensions. However, in 1997, pensions in the private sector have to be fully vested within 5-7 years. They were also not available to settle lawsuits, IIRC.

However the amount would vary with each additional year. Now the other thing is age. Some pensions state that to get full retirement, your age plus years of service should be equal to 85. Hence age 55 + 20 yrs equals 85-would be eligible for full benefits.

Retirement with only 19 years would not be. Exactly what McCabe can get and at what age depends on the rules of the pension plan that he participated in.

However, there could be some additional legalities regarding government officials who have taken an oath, and I have no knowledge of that.

[ransomnote]

Must be something with my unit,
That’s what she said.
__________________________________________

BAGSTER! *points over your shoulder* ROOM! MOVE IT, Mister! NOW! Don’t make me get the yard rake!
:)

[No_Doll_i]

What’s going on?

[JockoManning]

Seems a little mystifying to me ... unless they are deliberately closely monitoring (of course) who she interacts with that are most supportive of her satanic person.

[saywhatagain]

One Anon has an answer to the "magical" question. I would copy it but its poor copy (hard to read) of a document explaining judicial proceedings.

Looks like from USLegal.com. Title is cut off in part states investigations/proceedings are kept confidential? Think Magic. What you see . . .

It the explains the definition of sealed indictment. At the end is gives an example.

The magistrate judge to whom an indictment is returned may direct that the indictment be kept secret until the defendant is in custody or has been released pending trial. The clerk must then seal the indictment, and no person may disclose the indictment's existance except as necessary to issue or execute a warrant or summons

That kinda fits in one of our scenarios, that the last BOOM is folks being arrested.

[TEXOKIE]

Whitelisting
Whitelisting is the practice of identifying entities that are provided a particular privilege, service, mobility, access or recognition. Entities on the list will be accepted, approved and/or recognized. Whitelisting is the reverse of blacklisting, the practice of identifying entities that are denied, unrecognised, or ostracised.
More at Wikipedia

[JockoManning]

OK. Standing by ... eyes open ... except when falling asleep. LOL.

[No_Doll_i]

Those are fake Q posts according to some other boards.

[JockoManning]

Thanks for thoughtful prayers of agreement—amplifying according to the Bible ... 1 putting 1,000 to flight? 2 putting 10,000 to flight? Works for me.

[JockoManning]

I think it would be remarkably educational

for her ... on prime time TV ...

To fall down a flight of steps and then before the world's eyes to shrivel up into a grotesque gargoyle appearing sort of barely human creature foaming at the mouth and ranting in raging shrill sounds before collapsing utterly and slowly disappearing in a sizzling shrinking mass of black goo.

I could applaud that script, should God desire to effect it.

[greeneyes]

Supposedly, Flynn does know where the bodies are buried. In addition to what he already knew, I can’t recall the details, but it had to do with a raid on QATAR or YEMEN, the one that someone had obviously leaked and a one of the team was killed.

But they got the info they needed from the computers etc. Also, one of the things that Flynn discussed with the Russian Ambassador was a list of names of the suspected pedos that Russia is cooperating on taking down.

[saywhatagain]

I saw that. I think what happened is that two boards were numbered the same sending folks in another board. But the ID was not in Bold indicating its good.

I think

[rolling_stone]

https://www.myfederalretirement.com/public/170.cfm

without reaching 20 years or age 50 under FERS law enforcement he is not eligible for an immediate retirement but still eligible for a reduced deferred pension at a later age.

[JockoManning]

Hmmmmmmmm. Thanks.