Posted on 03/13/2018 10:28:10 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
http://https://qanon.pub
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/#
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3635959/posts?page=234#234
I used to think it was the Argentine sub, and that might have been useful cover for a more dangerous sub (higher capability in all respects). When I saw the pic of the Argentine sub I just felt sorry for those who died in it. Looks too old to do much and it does not look capable of any aspect of “silent running,” so you wouldn’t need the class of aircraft sent into the zone (sub hunters) we’ve seen because it should be detected with more conventional means.
But I can see the CIA sinking that one to raise speculation so that the capabilities of a sub later detected might be temporarily underestimated. The CIA thinks of humans as specs of dirt so they would thinking nothing of sinking an Argentine sub “just for show.”
https:// www.geekwire.com/2018/bill-gates-meet-president-trump-white-house-thursday/
I don’t think we are supposed to post and links to 8chan.
oops, my bad... don’t tell ransomnote!!
;-)
You can ask mods to delete.
Someone just posted on twitter that the 13 exclamation points may be related to MS13.... makes sense to me.
I reported abuse on myself will that do it?
I counted 12. But I have been known to be wrong. Just don't remember when.
Thanks all. It’s nice that you can see the anon comments just by mousing over the numbers.
I used to think it was the Argentine sub, and that might have been useful cover for a more dangerous sub (higher capability in all respects).
_________________________________________
What I meant to say is I used to think it was the Argentine sub but now that FReepers have provided more information about it, I think the “disappearance” of that sub might have been useful cover for a more dangerous sub (higher capability in all respects).
I’ll add that one of the intel videos I watched (Shipman, former CIA ?) said the CIA has it’s own equipment (planes, boats etc.) and weapons cached all over the world. Maybe they took some of those trillions of dollars that Obama et. al. swiped and simply placed an order for their own sub with all the bells and whistles they wanted.
Great appearance tonight Lots of laughs and information !
I think your alternate sub theory is very likely the truth.
One of the human trafficking subs? Who was aboard? Was it sabotaged because of that by rogue CIA
You're probably right. Not much in common and lots of billionaire titty bumping. So why meet?
Skullduggery afoot?
Thanks!! Was a good night in Q World!!
Maybe Trump told him the Internet Bill of Rights was coming and he better get on the right side of it. Or maybe he told him Windows 10 seriously sux, who knows.
;-)
My mistake -it is only 12 (darn progressive lenses are just as bad as a democrat in misleading a person)...
or part of the CIA weapon cache used to instigate stuff.
That too
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.