Posted on 03/12/2018 12:17:08 AM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3638382/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
http://qanon.pub
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/#
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3638382/posts?page=2000#2000
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Re Zero Hedge:
I don’t know about current FR policy.
But, I do know that ZH is an aggregator, and sometimes the places they aggregate from might have some copyright issues. Did you look at the “ultimate” source of the article. Sometimes ZH states it, sometimes not.
To me, one of the main reasons against the flat earth is
a flat plate with a bubble on top and some deceiving light show in the bubble
is FARRRRRRRRRRR tooooo anemic, wimpy a display of God's GRANDEUR.
What if the non-eligibilty was proven to be a conscious criminal fraud?
Right enough. Courtesy finger slap.
Evidently Q does whether it is a misdirection or whatever.
But it's not of great interest, to me.
If it proves out significant or useful to future strategies or goals, OK. For now, it seems too much of a stretch for too little benefit.
then how is 1/3+2/3=1 if 1/3=.333.... and 2/3=.666....?
WOW.
No difference. The De Facto Doctrine is meant only to prevent chaos, not to protect the innocent or even punish wrong-doers. Appointments and acts can be undone by conventional means and normal prosecutions can proceed, but government is going to continue uninterrupted.
I think it’s Xi and those are Chinese flags. My opinion He looks more like Xi.
Y’all making my head hurt.
Bahahahaahaha!
;-)
I hope the real cowboys have not surrendered their steel jockstraps and guns. This is not a game of tiddle-d-winks.
Makes no difference. The rationale or basis for the doctrine is to minimize chaos. The doctrine is not always applied. There have been improvidently seated officials whose decisions were ditched, but that typically happens when the decisions affect a small number of people, like "one."
There would be considerable political and public pressure to remove Sotomayor and Kagan from SCOTUS, and perhaps other judges; but their participation in past cases would not cause all of those cases to fall out, and those judges would very unlikely do the honorable thing and resign.
ph
We take that seriously. It's just not a priority of our curiosity currently. Maybe it should be, but it's not.
The person who posted that Q drop with 3939 at the end stated shortly thereafter that the “3939” was a typo, mistake, and NOT part of the Q drop.
That’s very impressive article, to us.
Who is CLFK...that looks like Xi to me. Same haircut, same facial dimensions and shape, same hair outline.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.