Posted on 02/12/2018 3:56:31 AM PST by ransomnote
Edited on 02/13/2018 7:01:59 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to share information and opinions about Q Anon content. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?q=1&;page=1>
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my prior Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference:
A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
Please private message me to report trolls. The Admins have limited time to deal with requests regarding trolls and I'm hoping to reduce abuse reports from this thread from multiple persons into one set of requests.
If you are new to Q Anon trolls, you may find the following thread useful.
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
BZZZZZT! Q's first post was on October 28, 2017. Q has said NOTHING about who was behind 9/11.
If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security.
07/02/16
https://archive.is/JEXOo#selection-6375.0-6375.254
Wow I missed that for sure, I need a good hi-res copy of the presidential portrait... wonder if it is same thing as the inscription in his ring I heard about years ago?
Thanks for finding that LJ, yes we got a name! Although I’m now of the mind that if there were anything to it we would have seen it resurface or someone else be lending credibility to it. Maybe they have and it’s still stuck in some obscure area of the web waiting to be brought into the open.
Not the same person.
Sorry, Bodellian_Girl, you are conflating someone else with this Q. . . these are not the same posters at all. The writing style and approach is completely different. That claim of a re-invented FBI Q Anon has been floated and completely shot down.
There have been numerous Anonymous, Anons, Etc. In these 4chan and 8chan forums there are thousands of Anonymous posters and there have been many who have come and gone with a Q in their name before. This on is "FBI Q Anon" and was posting before Obama was out of office.
This one has been certified by the administrator for the 4chan as uniquely different from any before by giving him q specific ID code when he first started posting on 4chan to differentiate him from all others. It then got compromised and it was moved to Reddit for a short period before a secure Q board was created ONLY for Q on 8chan and he returned.
I think it is supposed to be America being destroyed
_____________________________
That’s what I thought when I saw it. What else could it be? The New World Order does believe that America must be destroyed (partially) or broken to put an end to independent nations and usher in the one world government.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYnIFOtS_BA
"Latest Dilley Intel 2-11-18: 12 Military Panels Sitting Now ..."
Notes from the video (BRENDEN DILLEY drop):
"It was amendment {to Exec Order} to EO 13223--an amendment that PROBABLY FLEW UNDER THE RADAR...
"12 panels of 12 {people sitting on each one}
"Marine Group ready to snatch 44"
"Tonight will be OFF THE CHART"
"POTUS will use EBS {Emergency Broadcast System} more than once in this next week"
"Hold onto your hats. SH*T IS GOING TO GET REAL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABu0lFHmdn8
"experimental drug promises to kill the flu virus in a day"
Fits with assertions that the US helped NK get it’s nuke program where it is today. Must not let the US have the capability to defend itself if we are going to have a one world government! :(
I've read this and similar accounts of He Whos Name We Never Mention. I hope he is in line right behind Ginsburg.
And do we really think Israel wasn’t among those involved?
2) Iran Deal (funding)= bad actors in the US government (pointing to Obama?) Flats of money loaded on cargo planes?) funds Iran, NK, terrorists and others owed payola.
3) "NK Nuclear (mini suc)(icbm suc)
>War engine
>Protection
" May mean the US bad actors (points to Obama and others, Hillary?) helped NK get to the point of successful mini nuke and test of icbm. Hillary was to be president and her task list, per the New World Order's plans was to start WWIII. Q has said NK nuke/war capability is controlled by CIA. The CIA was using the NK nuke program as a war engine (start WWIII, threaten US) and protection should US try to attack CIA's foothold in NK. Obama shut down NASA efforts (remember - gave them new goal of social engineering acceptance of Muslim ideology?) and gave space contract to Elon Musk who then helped share our technology with NK to bring them up to speed to become the successful threat to US that Hillary needed them to be. Q's "Checkmate" drops mid January indicate that records of email accounts from private network and file server that Obama adminstration had installed in North Korea (Eric Schmidt)prove that 8 top swamp creatures including Obama and Hillary had email accounts on that server (treason).
Have I got that right?
Okay......that’s so weird. National Gallery? cut and paste art....And Q asks why is Obama seen sitting in a bush?
That sounds good to me. Boy, am I glad HRC lost. Whew!
Ditto. I think a bit of dissenting opinion or skepticism is actually a healthy thing as long as the person isn’t abusive about it, which I haven’t seen Corlorde be.
Q didn’t ask why BHO was sitting in a bush. That was an anon.
Just my 2 cents. I don’t think this Q is the FBI Q given FBI is so corrupt and “our” Q is military intelligence based. :)
Wouldn’t it be crazy if the IG report goes so far as to have investigated this angle and found something out to tie this in? No wonder they’d need to feed the red pills slowly and build up to it. That would be hard for many to swallow. The left would stomp off to their safe spaces with their hands over their ears.
Those were anonymous posters pn 4chan supposedly from inside the FBI answering Questions from other anons, as they called themselves, Bodleian_Girl. So he naturally called himself "QAnon" temporarily while answering Questioms. . . whether whoever it was was a real FBI insider or a poseur. There have been other "QAnon" posters on other threads on 4chan and 8chan who have completely different IDs. There were eight different Anonymous posters answering questions under the various FBI question topics. One of those adopted the name "FBI Anon Q" for an AMA session where his "answers" were really off-the-wall.
This poster originally introduced himself as "Q Clearance Patriot".
Thank you for sharing that distinction. I thought I was reading it wrong and just skipped over it. Makes more sense now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.