Posted on 02/09/2018 6:23:09 PM PST by ransomnote
#696
Feb 9 2018 18:06:34
Q
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
[Next week]
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
We warned you.
You are stupid.
Can you sleep?
We can help.
Q
(Excerpt) Read more at qcodefag.github.io ...
What is the name on the seat marker in front of him? Adm. Rogers?
Pelosi?
I define your approach as meekness based on this quote of yours,
The ends justify the means is not an argument that conservatives should be making.
That attitude is one I have watched conservatives have since the culture wars began in ernest in the sixties. We take the high moral ground while the left uses every dirty trick in the book. And we have lost. Now we find ourselves on the brink. And you suggest we continue our losing strategy?
That is the road to ruin, goodman. In time of war, the ends DO justify the means, to a certain extent. I don't advocate fascist or genocidal tactics, but a brief suspension of the Marquis of Queensbury rules of engagement are in order and necessary. Anything less I consider meek.
Regarding morality and Christianity as an excuse to lay down and lose? I reject it.
The bible is not a suicide pact. Neither is the Constitution. I will not have the very foundations of our society turned on us and used as weapons to defeat us.
I am by no means attacking you and I appreciate your sentiments. They come from a good place, I know. I just say we cannot keep the America we know if we don't get down in the mud and fight these people.
With all due respect, goodman.
the apparent unwillingness or inability of Q-true believers to engage in constructive dialogue with critics in a manner that is logically consistent
I have to disagree with you strongly here. This group of people (Qbirds) seems very polite and reasonable to critics and the curious. Until the contingent of hostiles jumps ugly. Maybe you haven't seen that. Keep reading the threads and just watch. This is a basket of very non-deplorable people.
Our purpose, as defined by Q, is to learn together, solve puzzles together, and share knowledge. We are told to "red pill" each other and the outside world. What would be the purpose of alienating our own community members?
No. The disruptors disrupt. Some of us engage them. That is what you see.
Again. With all due respect.
Your limited thinking would get you killed.
You are needed alive.
Open your mind...and join the fight.
:)
>>And perhaps he was.
What an amazing thought.
One can only hope...
There is a need for Obama to face a firing squad...to discourage anyone else from pulling this sh!t again.
It won't be Trump who orders it, but there is a strong likelihood that such will transpire...but only after all his (Obama's) crimes come to light.
I just happened to be watching TV during 9/11. I heard explosions, dozens of people talking about bombs going off-including 1st responders saying this. I saw what looked exactly like controlled demolitions I had seen before.
I read the 9/11 commission report-should be called CYA report. Who would benefit from taking down the WTC? I read that it had a lot of asbestos-very expensive renovations were going to be needed.
Port Authority had recently turned over to new lessee(Silverstein - alleged friend of David Rockefeller).
He had secured Ins. for full value of WTC for each incident. He and Ins. company went to court - he claimed 2 incidents and they claimed 1. He prevailed. Plenty of money to pay off loan, build new building, and avoid expense of asbestos removal.
In addition, I have read that the debris tested positive for the type of explosives that would likely have been used. I have no idea whether that is accurate.
I do know that WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane, and it went down too -exactly like a controlled demolition. I don't recall all the details on records that were destroyed, but it included some financial, as well as CIA etc. There was something along those lines at WTC 1 or 2 too, but I can't remember details.
Does the fact that the Empire State building was hit by a plane and did not have big fire, and collapse have any relevance? Was the Empire State Building inherently stronger that WTC?
I have no conclusions, but lots of questions, and certainly there are people in the world who might not hesitate to help jihads along for their own financial benefit.
So it's important to define the term, and I'm willing to expand my thinking on the subject, after researching it.
Wizards and Warlocks, the USAF Academy built a Wiccan Temple on the Academy grounds year before last. Also a very large gay membership within the ranks prior to Clinton’s changes.
Is Q alluding to covert mil ops to reign in expose these hidden actors as well?
You know SOMEBODY on team CommieSymp had to make a plan Z in the event zero got busted and isolated.
That would be beyond Albino Tree Frog’s pay grade; it probably fell to Holder or Axlerod.
Ad hominem seems to be the favored tactic to respond to Freepers who dare to voice their objections to the claims of Q-true believers.
An endlessly open mind is not a good thing. A properly formed one is.
In my opinion, the Q phenomenon is an attempt to discredit consevative supporters of Trump. So far, at FR, I fear he —or more likely they —has/ have been effective.
ThanQ, Mairdie...I watch your videos always...good stuff.
Don't ask me, Triple. I see about as good as Mr. Magoo.
That said, it appears you are a Q troll.
If that is the case, perhaps you would be happier on other threads.
Place marker.
I used to Mark those who followed q without looking into it. Then I saw that President Trump shared a link to an Obscure website that was discussing q and following the white rabbit. Then I took it serious in look into it. The more I read, the more I realized it was real.
Perhaps deactivated declassified then internally retasked for internal clandestine uses by deep state with no one in gov the wiser?
I only recognize the person in the very forefront. Can someone name the others?
No Billy, not in that context I don't think. Q is talking about taking down CIA black op sites [2] and saying there are more to come [44] and they are saving the best for last [P].
Also, Pelosi is hardly the best or the top of the food chain.She is relatively small fry in the big game, if you ask me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.