Posted on 02/09/2018 5:54:48 PM PST by familyop
A White House speechwriter resigned Friday after his former wife claimed that he was violent and emotionally abusive during their turbulent 2½ -year marriage allegations that he vehemently denied, saying she was the one who victimized him.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
does a speechwriter classify as a WH “official”?
Former spouses never lie in divorce court.
THIS IS ALL ORCHESTRATED. WEINSTEIN WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A SACRIFICIAL LAMB SO THE LEFT CAN GO AFTER TRUMP.
Yep! And BTW, according to Fox News, the Washington Post was the first to “report” this.
Chuck Johnson bump
that guy’s vicious
And the past week there was this:
Former CIA counterterrorism official Phil Mudd: The FBI people "are ticked" and they'll be saying of Trump, You've been around for 13 months. We've been around since 1908. I know how this game is going to be played. We're going to win"
Beginning to agree.
There’s a woman at Fox News who’s in charge of investigating abuses of offices against Trump. Can’t remember her name, offhand, because I don’t watch much TV and have only watched some of the videos from Fox News.
She tends to work for the men and women who do most of the reporting, but she has appeared a time or two. She would be the one to get a message to about the consideration that you brought up.
Men should not be losing their jobs over accusations. I really want to live in the land where ‘innocent until proven guilty’ means something.
Agreed. No conviction, no adverse action.
Just found her in a video again. Sara Carter, Investigative Reporter.
I’m guessing that a good tip should go to her office. She and her people have done some amazing work. Sorry, I don’t have contact info for her office or anyone in her office, yet. Maybe at the Fox News site or elsewhere.
Here’s a Fox News video (at the Fox News YouTube channel) with her giving information in a discussion.
Jarrett: Those we expect to uphold the law are breaking it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlG1JKYGVv0
At the rate that this country is going, God may put a halt to it all soon and the only winners will be those who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and are not ashamed of the Gospel.
No proof just wild speculation. Take it to another level, what if these guys were being blackmailed to provide leaks?
What is happening out there with the process of determining a case?
The process used to include “innocent until proven guilty”. Now, actresses, women of means, ex-wives can start a movement to accuse men of abuse, years later, and it is auto-guilt and the case is closed.
We are certain some men are guilty and possibly their dastardly behavior can not be proven. But, in order to avoid mistakenly persecuting and prosecuting even one innocent, it used to matter so greatly that the PROCESS of law required proof.
This brings up “circumstantial evidence”, which wins some cases alright, but how about slander. These guys need to fight back and sue these broads if they are innocent.
How else does this ME TOO movement ever get slowed. This monster is ruining lives, careers and families, simply by women howling and pointing fingers, in some cases well after the Statute of Limitations has passed.
Weinstein had gotten into a war w/Steve Bannon and my suspicion is that Bannon worked with what he had to bring the a-hat down.
This speechwriter is going to go down in a rush to judgment and he may well be a victim of domestic abuse himself. He has no track record, but I’m wondering if this second wife does.
The last thing in the world that the Dems want is #MeToo. There are just way too many skeletons in way too many closets.
MUDD is an sob, a CNN regular, and a permanent NeverTrumper, who is doubtless royally pizzed that Trump is detonating the top of the Coup Crowd, who resided inside the FBI and Justice Department.
Yep
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.