Posted on 02/07/2018 5:09:09 PM PST by Swordmaker
# 679 Feb 7 2018 16:40:33 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: baa9d4 298274
BF865568-AABA-4354-A7C6-18….png
:We see you (live).
Q
----------------
678 Feb 7 2018 16:25:34 Anonymous ID: 0110e1 298086
>>297666
Martha M on Fox just said that Nancy must have felt betrayed by Chuck because he gave in on the government shutdown regarding DACA!!!
Feb 7 2018 16:29:09 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: eb3537 298134 >>298086
Thank you for visiting the WH.
Q
--------------
677 Feb 7 2018 15:57:55 Anonymous ID: 6e2676 297717 >>297686
>>297709
military target square?
Feb 7 2018 16:17:01
Q
!UW.yye1fxo ID: eb3537 297951 >>297717
Kill box.
Q
-------------
#676 Feb 7 2018 15:55:33 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 647c68 297686
You have so much more than you know.
SO MUCH!
Future proves past.
News unlocks map.
=
+
++
+++
RED OCTOBER.
IRON EAGLE.
[]
Q
-----------------
#675 Feb 7 2018 15:37:48 Anonymous ID: 02c7a0 297521
This is pure speculation and probably just fitting things in places, but….From the latest trump tweet, just taking the first 3 Letters of the capital letters I come up with
[[ TBA - MIS - MAG - RDB ]]
TBA = To Be Announced
MIS = Management Information System
Management Information Systems are typically organized around the functional areas of an organization. Learn about some of the most common applications of Management Information Systems.
MAG = Make America Great
RDB = Relation Database Management
RDB is a fast, portable, relational database management system without arbitrary limits, other than memory and processor speed) that runs under, and interacts with, the UNIX Operating system.
=============================================
Is Q/Pres going to use a MIS to MAG with compents from a RDB aka coded leaks to or from the NSA/WIKI soon to blow EVERYTHING wide open and show us the LIGHT?
Feb 7 2018 15:42:08 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 647c68 297553
>>297521
No.
Re_read crumbs re: CS WH submission.
CS & NP divided.
Coincidence?
The ART of illusion.
Q
-------------------
#674 Feb 7 2018 15:30:44 Anonymous ID: da6423 297464
Screenshot_20180207-172345.jpg
Screenshot_20180207-172418.jpg
Screenshot_20180207-172449.jpg
Screenshot_20180207-172634.jpg
Screenshot_20180207-172656.jpg
>>297354 Barlow was sometimes held up as a straw man for a kind of naive techno-utopianism that believed that the Internet could solve all of humanity's problems without causing any more. As someone who spent the past 27 years working with him at EFF, I can say that nothing could be further from the truth. Barlow knew that new technology could create and empower evil as much as it could create and empower good. He made a conscious decision to focus on the latter: "I knew it’s also true that a good way to invent the future is to predict it. So I predicted Utopia, hoping to give Liberty a running start before the laws of Moore and Metcalfe delivered up what Ed Snowden now correctly calls 'turn-key totalitarianism.'”
Barlow’s lasting legacy is that he devoted his life to making the Internet into “a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth . . . a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.”
In the days and weeks to come, we will be talking and writing more about what a extraordinary role Barlow played for the Internet and the world. And as always, we will continue the work to fulfill his dream.
Source: https:// www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/john-perry-barlow-internet-pioneer-1947-2018
Feb 7 2018 15:39:32 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 647c68 297530
>>297464 Heart attacks can be deadly. Q
Wow, fantasy. You got it all figured out, don't you.
You should start your own threads and make an anti-Q ping list. All you enlightened people can gather there and talk about us ignorant Qbirds.
You can be the leader of a movement. YOU can be the savior of FreeRepublic.
DO IT DO IT DO IT.
They can have this dead thread.
You made a very clear, straightforward point. You said you understood my main point. If that is true, why can’t you encapsulate it? It wouldn’t take long at all.
Please consider validating your claim. It’s the right thing to do.
Not when it just feed something unhealthy.
Going to do some errands and have dinner with a friend. May stop by briefly. If I can find it. LOL. Thanks.
Neither you nor anyone else involved in that discussion had a clue as to what my most central, fundamental and crucial point was. Yet I made it very simply and clearly, again and again.
Let that sink in.
You're being way too dramatic.
You might be more careful. That sharp spiritual discernment might crash your contrarian reputation. LOL.
You just never know what I'll say next, Jockolicious.
:)
P.S. Don't you find it fascinating that old Fantasy wont address me? He won't talk to Grey Whiskers either. He don't mess with the guys that give him a crack.
That's a bully trait, don't you think? He does like to argue with women, though. I'm building a nice psychological profile on him.
I have absolutely no idea what you.......
:)
Be well.
You cannot disagree with a point that you fail to grasp/understand. That is the bottom line of the discussion. No one A, understood the point, or B, was willing to admit to understanding the point. It’s not the first time and is highly unlikely to be the last.
Sometimes, it is best to recognize the futility of engaging.
Agree. In two absolutely futile cases I no longer engage, at all, ever.
In the present case, however, a short, simple statement was made. It should have been very easy for that statement to be backed up and validated. But it wasn’t; the back-up evidence has not been provided and probably never will be.
It’s typically this way with a particular kind of belief system. Statements are routinely made that cannot be substantiated. That’s just the way it is, because the system itself rests predominantly on belief, as opposed to resting on facts, logic and evidence.
Savior from the Deep State. You may not be able to see the difference. You do waste a lot of bandwidth on this thread.
‘Savior from the Deep State.’
That’s not what Q said. That’s only your interpretation.
‘You do waste a lot of bandwidth on this thread.’
The ad hominem on these Q threads is off the charts.
The True Believers are in so deep they don’t know which was is up or out.
Be well.
True!
And am I mistaken, or don’t the Q-believers have a big, ‘troll,’-free thread going somewhere? I thought one of them made a reference to it. What kind of compulsion is it to be never satisfied, but to have to search out and gratuitously insult anyone *anywhere* who is failing to fall into Q lockstep?
Thank you; you be well too.
Oops; I got my threads confused. That middle paragraph was intended for a different discussion.
Correct, and I haven't "turned" on anyone, nor have I called anyone names or insulted their intelligence.
If that's your best try, you may want to sit down and pay attention to what it is I actually SAY.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.