Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did turtleface shoot down the military pay resolution?
Me | 1/21/2018 | GeorgiaDawg32

Posted on 01/21/2018 6:54:48 AM PST by GeorgiaDawg32

I've been searching the web trying to find his reasoning and can't locate it anywhere.

Does anyone know?

Was it just to obstruct?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: 115th; buildthefence; daca; dreamact; dreamers; maga; mcconnell; schumershutdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: silverleaf
I was wondering if Trump had the power to draft the entire US Congress-or at least make them all “federal employees”

Wasn't this used by the congress critters to avoid obamacare...

Designated each congressional office as a "small business" and so exempt

21 posted on 01/21/2018 7:36:36 AM PST by spokeshave (FBI = Feral Bureau of Insurrection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

if the troops don’t get paid,,, does that mean govvies don’t get paid??? I crack myself up.


22 posted on 01/21/2018 7:36:38 AM PST by ronniesgal (still winning !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

The Democrats are despicable
Really....

The Democrats are criminal
Really


23 posted on 01/21/2018 7:39:37 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Can’t our president continue to pay the troops?

Nope. Article I, Section 8, on powers of congress:

12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

Congress can put out bills that allocate funding for agencies which would continue past the end of the budget term, but there is a special constitutional carve out for the military.

Why? The founders were afraid of the potential abuse a Standing Army would be put to. Historically, the Standing Army was also used to enforce the will of the King. If the founders looked at today's government, they would have added the stipulation that ALL federal "enforcement" agencies are considered elements of a "standing army", and that NO funding for any federal employee charged with enforcement of federal law or regulation could exist for longer than the two year budget term.

24 posted on 01/21/2018 7:41:11 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
Turtle face. That’s a good one, and accurately descriptive, too.

I had never heard the nickname before, but I knew immediately that you were referring to Mitch McConnell.

25 posted on 01/21/2018 7:45:09 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Trump already doesn’t accept any pay
He should make this Congressional maneuver widely known and ridiculed
Post pictures of DiFi saying shut downs kill people under pictures of the democrats feasting and gloating

“ShutDown Schumer”= we have a new nickname for the despicable schmuck from NY


26 posted on 01/21/2018 7:46:51 AM PST by silverleaf (A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
The best protection they could give military pay is to include Congressional pay under the same conditions.

That's hardly a motivation for Congress as most of them are millionaires and the rest live on graft.

27 posted on 01/21/2018 7:49:35 AM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Thank you for clearing the fog with that description. I knew it was something along those lines, but since parliamentary procedure is exceedingly arcane, many incorrect motives tend to be inferred.


28 posted on 01/21/2018 7:54:41 AM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
attempting

??? That reality was passed when the Republicans took the majority and subverted the Contract with America.

29 posted on 01/21/2018 7:55:50 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
I was once wrong back in ‘92.

Is that the time you thought you were wring and then discovered that you were mistaken about being wrong?

Happened to me a time or two....

30 posted on 01/21/2018 7:58:18 AM PST by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives......;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
It's because McConnell scheduled a vote on the CR at 1am Monday morning. That's when debate on the CR ends per Senate rules. Holding a vote would suspend debate and push back the vote.

I suspect all this wheeling and dealing to to make sure the CR passes Monday morning.

31 posted on 01/21/2018 8:00:18 AM PST by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

You got it..:)

I vindicated myself.


32 posted on 01/21/2018 8:05:12 AM PST by GeorgiaDawg32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

“...It does not hit the fan until the end of the month.”
***************************************
It used to be that the military was paid once a month. Now, most are paid twice a month as an option.


33 posted on 01/21/2018 8:05:57 AM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob
What about in the case of a matter of Nation Security as outlined by Trumps human trafficking Executive Order?

So your assertion is that a unilaterally issued presidential diktat overrides he plain language of the Constituion?

That's dictatorship, not a Republic.

34 posted on 01/21/2018 8:08:26 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

I was in the Navy ‘70-’77. We got paid twice a month, 1st and the 15th.


35 posted on 01/21/2018 8:11:06 AM PST by GeorgiaDawg32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Whose going to be MACK and throw Yertle into the mud? Get rid of the 60 vote rule.
The Dems will do that the minute they have 51 votes in the Senate.
It's the worst Kabuki ever.
See Mitch, Chuck,Paul, and Nancy below

36 posted on 01/21/2018 8:28:17 AM PST by Waverunner (I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
"No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time." Article I, Section 9, Clause 7

That does not seem to apply if a president wants to send hundreds of billions of dollars to terrorist regimes.

37 posted on 01/21/2018 9:15:06 AM PST by UnwashedPeasant (I told you so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
No....I'm just asking if this creates a special circumstance as a matter of national security.

Furthermore, there's no need for the snide attitude FRiend. It would be nice if you could remember we're playing on the same team and am your gun at the enemy instead of your allies.

38 posted on 01/21/2018 11:26:53 AM PST by thingumbob (Antifa. Carrying on Hitler's legacy one beating at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Military doesn’t get paid - Congress doesn’t get paid
= = = = = = = = = =
Congress is an ongoing criminal enterprise.

The Military isn’t — though they have the guns, the criminals control the movements and ammo.

If Congress doesn’t get paid they have to gripe about it as if they don’t ALL will realize that the pittance most of them get is nothing compared to the insider trading, bribes, pay offs etc etc hence, an ONGOING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE..

They should be under the RICO blanket...


39 posted on 01/21/2018 11:34:48 AM PST by xrmusn ((6/98)""In todays world:::WE, THE USofA are Rudyard Kiplings 'Tommy'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob
No....I'm just asking if this creates a special circumstance as a matter of national security.

So... the President declares 'matter of national security' and just does what he wants? Is that how you think the Constitution works?

It would be nice if you could remember we're playing on the same team and am your gun at the enemy instead of your allies.

It would be nice you could remember the Constitution isn't optional and if you think the Constitution can be suspended because the President declares 'national security' you're not actually on my team.

Craving authoritarianism is the Road to Serfdom.

40 posted on 01/21/2018 1:50:34 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson