Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The FBI is a pack of lying criminals and I hope they tear their freaking hair out over this.
2 posted on
01/14/2018 8:55:32 AM PST by
gaijin
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Does anyone think it would be a good idea for the postal service to open all letters and scan them before delivering them? To me, that’s not conceptually much different than what the NSA is doing now with electronic communication.
To: Swordmaker
4 posted on
01/14/2018 8:56:54 AM PST by
Mark17
(Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
1978 Synopsis---should just be --- Synopsis
1978 is his document number.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We can’t trust them, we should have never trusted them.
Can’t trust them on FISA or 702s.
FBI Leadership by going after all these people in an abuse of power has created this trust issue, I suspect that when this abuse fully comes to light, they will loose complete access to this information.
7 posted on
01/14/2018 9:00:17 AM PST by
dila813
(Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The FBI seems to be baffled by doing their job. How did the Las Vegas shooting investigation turn out?
8 posted on
01/14/2018 9:02:07 AM PST by
jospehm20
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Kill 702 dead, Get a warrant as requited by the constitution or go to hell. Filibusterer 702 to death!! Preserve our 4th amendment rights!! These bastards are becoming the enemy.
10 posted on
01/14/2018 9:04:35 AM PST by
raiderboy
( "...if we have to close down our government, weÂ’re building that wall" DJT)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The last thing I want at this point is to give that cabal of crooks and traitors (at the top) more power and capability to spy on us. They have to start over and rebuild their credibility from the ground up with me.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; dayglored; ThunderSleeps; ShadowAce; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 5thGenTexan; ...
Once more into the breach dear friends. . . another article on the FBI vs. American citizen's personal privacy. Strangely enough, this time, instead of an Apple device, the one device that the FBI cannot get into from the Las Vegas massacre is a Samsung Galaxy phone, most likely protected by a third-party 256 bit AES encryption which only Stephan Paddock knew the key, because there are multiple tools to unlock Android devices on the market. PING! Pinging dayglored, ShadowAce, and ThunderSleeps for their respective ping lists.

FBI vs. Citizen Privacy
Ping!
The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me
14 posted on
01/14/2018 9:17:59 AM PST by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just a few months ago some wondered if the FBI was not playing a deceitful game by pretending not to be able to break through current encryption techniques. I confess to having had that question myself.
16 posted on
01/14/2018 9:18:44 AM PST by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
To: GOPJ; Jane Long; HarleyLady27; RitaOK; DollyCali; Tennessee Nana; sickoflibs; TADSLOS; AuntB; ...
......the public is demanding more security from their government .......in light of shocking revelations that the latest batch of cyber criminals were operating on American soil....a virtual cabal setup (and protected) within Obama's FBI and Justice Department......... This assorted band of Secret Police were ordered to attack the current President (even before he declared as a candidate)......and aided and abetted the coverup of massive crimes committed by Hillary and her husband (while Bill Clinton held office, and, later, out of office as the ex-president).
17 posted on
01/14/2018 9:20:46 AM PST by
Liz
(Our side has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They had a back door, but we discovered it, and now it’s a hugh chip-based Intel security problem. It is called the Meltdown bug.
18 posted on
01/14/2018 9:24:12 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(It is known.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The FBI is literally b-tching, maoning, and groaning about fundamental mathematics and computation. You can't ban such things.
It's absurd to think that every secure device or file on the planet must have some kind of "backdoor" mandadted to be placed in it just so Government can effortlessly snoop out everyone's secrets whenever they decide they have the need.
The fact is Government can't control such things, and any government which could would be utterly totalitarian. Technology has reached the point where it's hard to decrypt things, and that's that...
22 posted on
01/14/2018 9:31:09 AM PST by
sargon
("If the President doesn't drain the Swamp, the Swamp will drain the President.")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Apple is really goring their goat with the Secure Enclave. Not even Apple can get past it. Now Secure Enclave is making its way to Macbooks and the iMac Pro. It must keep the FBI up at night.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
...the public is demanding more security from the government, not less, especially in light of the fact that the latest batch of cyber criminals were a literal cabal within both the FBI and Justice Department to attack the current President and help cover the crimes of his opponent ... If the FBI and CIA want their power back they CAN'T BE THE GOON SQUAD OF THE POWERFUL LIKE THE IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD. Or the Gestapo or the KGB... or any of the other human filth groups that shill for powerful thuggy elites.
25 posted on
01/14/2018 9:38:44 AM PST by
GOPJ
(The press is fed by the FBI & CIA - YOUR tax dollars at work - propping up establishment democrats.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The government does not have the right to see yours or my data anywhere, on a computer device, or written on an envelope. None whatsoever. It does not have the right to a “back door”. “back door” is a nice-sounding name for the government having the right and the ability to waltz right in and look at anything they f*cking want.
Government has the right and the obligation to get the f*ck out of our lives.
32 posted on
01/14/2018 9:58:11 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(Lying Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It doesn't matter what the FBI/NSA/CIA, or any of the other organs of the feral government do. Cryptography is a right. Unless they can make knowledge of mathematics a criminal offense, this train has long ago left the station.
34 posted on
01/14/2018 10:10:16 AM PST by
zeugma
(I always wear my lucky red shirt on away missions!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
36 posted on
01/14/2018 10:53:32 AM PST by
Fedora
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I used to have a favorite encryption program. It was also the favorite of several online retailers. Then the government asked the manufacturer to put in a back door, and they did.
Within a few months one or two of the online retailers had massive credit card breaches and people had their card data stolen.
I am still using the version that preceded the back-door version. The manufacturer of the encryption program went bankrupt. Anyone think this couldn’t happen again?
The only way for something to remain a secret is to deny access to it by anyone, especially the government.
39 posted on
01/14/2018 11:31:22 AM PST by
BuffaloJack
(Men stand up for freedom; slaves kneel before their masters.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Apparently the FBI hasn’t figured out that we are Americans, and that we are CITIZENS of the USA. We are not, nor have we ever been POSSESSIONS of the USA, our privacy is our RIGHT, not theirs. We exist for our pleasure, not theirs, and finally we purchased OUR iPhones for OUR security, privacy and convenience; not theirs.
Perhaps these jerks would do better working at McDonalds; because they seem unworthy to work for the Federal Government.
40 posted on
01/14/2018 11:35:05 AM PST by
Hodar
(A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson