Zullo Dissects Four Images Purported to Represent Obama’s “Birth Certificate”

The Post & Email ^ | 12/31/2017 | Sharon Rondeau

[Elderberry]

For the third consecutive week, Obama birth certificate forgery investigator Mike Zullo was Carl Gallups’s guest on the “Freedom Friday” show on December 29, 2017 to discuss anomalies discovered in the “long-form” birth certificate image bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama II.”

Zullo was Gallups’s guest on December 1, when he began releasing analysis and commentary on his 5+-year investigation into the “long-form” birth certificate image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 said to represent Barack Hussein Obama’s original birth record from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH).

On March 1, 2012, Zullo declared at the first of what would be three press conferences that his initial six months of investigation showed that the birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery.”

For years, doubt has swirled about Obama’s birthplace and by extension, his constitutional eligibility to serve as president given that numerous credible reports have stated that he was born in Kenya or Indonesia and not Hawaii, as he claims.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires the president and commander of the military to be a “natural born Citizen,” a term the Framers did not precisely define in the new nation’s founding documents.

In his opening statement, Gallups predicted that the new year will be “magnificent” in regard to the exposure by the Trump Justice Department of long-hidden federal government corruption. Months ago, Trump himself criticized Justice for having failed to launch, at least at that time, investigations into a number of high-profile events which took place during the eight-year Obama regime.

“I think he’s gearing up for something…I’m going to get the popcorn and sit back and watch it,” Zullo said in regard to Gallups’s prediction of the hypothetical unveiling of the circumstances behind the Arwan Brothers,

[Savage Beast]

Obviously, they are afraid of Truth.

[SaveFerris]

It (letting the lies stand unopposed) will be the death of the Republic (if not corrected) while some dismiss it with a wave of the hand.

And then they’ll wonder what happened.

[SaveFerris]

Somebody got to him. I heard his interview - it was beyond bad acting.

[treetopsandroofs]

“Well good luck with that. Eight years of trying got buppkus”

Who actually “TRIED”?!

Saw many of the “Let it go” admonishment posts here also in the EARLY days of the Fraud’s reign.

[Nifster]

Lots of efforts in court all thrown out

Many folks claiming to have found proof that went nowhere

You can harp on Obozo all you want. It is more important to prevent it from happening again

[SgtHooper]

Bingo! And DITTO!!

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

ex President Obama was never constitutionally eligible and never should have been allowed to run for President.

It actually is up to the States to determine that, IMHO. The states elect the president, via the Electoral College - and the states actually are not to choose their Electors via popular vote.

Article II Section 1:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

Such being the case, federal courts would actually have no authority to hear any appeal of a state’s decision not to allow someone onto the ballot for president. In reality only purple states can have a controling effect; what difference would it actually make if the Republicans weren’t allowed on the ballot in New York, or the Democrats in Oklahoma? But Ohio could veto any Republican nominee absolutely, and have a dramatic influence if it black-balled a Democrat nominee.

IMHO the state governments should have laws on the books to enforce constitutional strictures against presidenial candidates. Hillary shouldn’t have been on the ballot if she couldn’t pass a superficial neurological exam, as seemed pretty clearly to be the case in ’16.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Obama’s handlers chose the option of destroying every shred of his identity.
.

[Savage Beast]

Exactly! It bears repeating, though with emphasis:

It (letting the lies stand unopposed) will be the death of the Republic (if not corrected) while some dismiss it with a wave of the hand. And then they’ll wonder what happened.

...which is exactly what the anti-American Left intends.

[SaveFerris]

It seems the powers that want to dismantle the nation have gone into maximum overdrive once Her Pantsuitness lost. /Captain Obvious

[Conservative Gato]

Such being the case, federal courts would actually have no authority to hear any appeal of a state’s decision not to allow someone onto the ballot for president. In reality only purple states can have a controling effect; what difference would it actually make if the Republicans weren’t allowed on the ballot in New York, or the Democrats in Oklahoma? But Ohio could veto any Republican nominee absolutely, and have a dramatic influence if it black-balled a Democrat nominee.

IMHO the state governments should have laws on the books to enforce constitutional strictures against presidenial candidates. Hillary shouldn’t have been on the ballot if she couldn’t pass a superficial neurological exam, as seemed pretty clearly to be the case in ’16.

It's interesting that you bring this up. I remember an investigation and article which came out during 0bama's first election or soon after. It was on the OCON or Official Certification of Nomination. Historically it is issued by the state for which the candidate is born certifying a candidates eligibility to run.

This investigation was about the top election official in Hawaii refused to issue an OCON for 0bama. So Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean decided to issue their own OCON certifying 0bama eligible to run. It was the only one of its kind where a state did not issue an OCON.

This never saw the light of day in the enemedia. I never saw it debunked, they just buried it like so many other things they try to bury, including Sheriff Joe's investigation in to 0bama's life narrative. I knew he wasn't eligible when I read this OCON investigation. Nancy Pelosi has a ton to answer for and she needs to be on the hot seat for this traitorous action against this nation.

CGato

[SaveFerris]

I remember the two documents Nancy Pelosi signed that had different language regarding Obama. Maybe somebody has them handy.

[Conservative Gato]

I remember the two documents Nancy Pelosi signed that had different language regarding Obama. Maybe somebody has them handy.

I couldn't find the original article where it breaks down the OCON but these are the same people who originally investigated this and a summary of what happened.

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html

The original investigation might still be on there in the archives where they break down 0bama's OCON's.

[Brown Deer]

i.e. that the State of Hawaii refused to show a certified copy to anyone without Obama’s permission.

and why wouldn't he want to give his permission, since he so proudly supposedly showed it to Guthrie?

The real question is, why did he have a need to forge two fake BCs, when he wrote in his book Dreams, that he already had the original - and indeed we know that he used that same BC to get his driver's license, because he never would have been required to pay those dozen parking tickets in Somerville before he ran for president, if he didn't have a valid driver's license.

[Seizethecarp]

Pinging to Sharon Rondeau’s write-up of Mike Zullo’s appearance on Freedom Friday...

Thanks, Elderberry!

[LucyT]

Thanks, Seizethecarp.

[little jeremiah]

You have no idea what Sessions is up to behind the scenes, unless you work under him and know all the investigations the FBI/DoJ is doing.

Second, it is not too late at all.

[little jeremiah]

Either troll of has avocation of malcontent and Debbie Downer.

[little jeremiah]

From my profile page:

“In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousand fold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.”

Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn

[little jeremiah]

You can’t prevent something if you don’t what what happened in the first place.

Duh.