Posted on 12/02/2017 12:55:48 PM PST by rx
These are the partial findings of an investigation into the claimed catastrophic engine failure that was said to have occurred within a couple minutes of take-off of a commuter airline Cessna Grand Caravan that carried a pilot and eight paying passengers off Moloka'i, Hawai'is Kalaupapa Peninsula on Wednesday, December 11th, 2013. The multi-media report's findings are generally limited to the NTSB's crash investigation. Found were several instances of fraudulent and likely criminal activity by NTSB employees or others participating closely with the NTSB investigation.
The NTSB is the US Transportation System's investigative agency, uniquely chartered to be insulated from outside influences. Rightly so, as influences that could skew investigative results could otherwise have far-ranging, inappropriate effects both domestically and internationally.
The results of NTSB investigations affect the activities and profitability of many multi-billion-dollar and smaller (for these purposes, aviation-related) corporations. FAA determinations and Airworthiness Directives related to this crash event cost thousands of dollars from each (US and ICAO) owner of the aircraft involved (and some other users of the same engine) in this crash, to the FAA-estimated tune of $60,000+ each. Shareholders of the Grand Caravan's Type Certificate's corporate manufacturers (engine: Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC); airframe: Cessna Aircraft Corporation and parent company, Textron Aviation) were implicitly made to suffer via degraded reputation of the the Cessna Grand Caravan product, if not in other ways as well.
Were outside influences that penetrated the NTSB's independence primarily responsible for the misbehavior evidenced inside this NTSB investigation? Or does the evidence show that false investigative activity took place entirely from within the NTSB by self-interested personnel?
If the instigation of misbehavior came from outside the NTSB, does uncovered evidence suggest the source--or at least characteristics that could help identify the source--of such external influence(s)? Given the downside potential of career-ending professional evaluation for complicity, criminal charges and possible prison time, what could nonetheless have enticed one or more NTSB employees to come to purposely false conclusions regarding one of the NTSB's larger, multi-man-year investigations?
Strikingly, clear evidence suggests not only did one or more NTSB employees write multiple false conclusions into the NTSB report for this incident, but such employee(s) may be responsible for the proven evidence falsification that has had the effect of framing engine manufacturer P&WC as culpable for this ditching, related hardships, injuries and a claimed, passenger death. Prior to any results of this partial finding report being published, P&WC saw it within its interest to settle two lawsuits that had been filed in Hawaii by the ostensible fatality's family and the Deputy Director of the Hawaii Department of Health. The plaintiffs' attorney for those cases declared to the media that he was pleased with the settlements.
Some of the answers as to why the NTSB would allow its investigation to become tainted lie outside this multimedia partial report, while additional evidence and information has been brought to light by the full investigative report in recently published book form, called "The Fuddy Hoax," by Hugo Feugen and Nellie Ristvedt. (An electronic form is also available.)
Do you know Butter? Have you looked at the plethora of research that Butter has contributed to the issues around Zippo over the years?
I think for you to jump into a thread to only offer your personal insult to an 18 year FReeper with out even the courtesy to ping the FReeper you believe suffers from a mental disorder is extremely rude.
A Fuddy mannequin in a too-short coffin and duplicate airplanes and ninja frogmen with an underwater mechanic shop is indeed lunacy.
Or nuttery, if you prefer.
Making up fan-fiction about that which is unknown is not research.
It’s crap, is all.
If there's lunacy to be spoken of here, it's clearly on your account, as your comment, "Probably got injected by a Ninja Frogman" does not reasonably or respectfully derive from anything else in the conversation.
There has been a former NTSB board member that has indicated a willingness to work with the authors! So much for your lunacy narrative!
One of the top investigative employees in the FAA has suggested one of the authors should be teaching a course to FAA personnel on this investigation, if not wider investigative techniques!
Do you, HG, have one scintilla of professional qualification that even goes in a similar direction to those mentioned as being on board with, agreeing with and complimenting the authors' investigative results? You have no idea what walls against which you're throwing your crap in hopes of it sticking!
Until such time, you really needn't bother throwing those insults around to pollute the days of lots of well-intentioned FReepers with them. If anyone's paying you, their money is poorly placed. Humble is anything but one of your many attributes.
It’s clear you’re not of a mind to familiarize yourself with your drive-by gunning target that you would neutralize, but FYI, there is no mention of a coffin or duplicate airplanes in the book.
Wasted lead.
Here’s a whole boatload of Butter’s nuttery.
Enough to wallow in for hours, good fun.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3118746/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3119584/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3120814/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3125646/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3126226/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3130289/posts
Nice of you to ping me so I could respond to this. Oh - I guess you didn’t. Why not?
The casket analysis was a mistake based on non-square grid lines in Word. When I was shown that I corrected myself and apologized.
The angle of the shadow on the door of the plane photo is not possible in real life, based on extensive experimenting I did to find out how shadows work. If that was wrong, anybody could show me and I would correct myself again. Nobody has shown me anything wrong with that analysis.
The 2nd “What Do You See?” thread is the one where the Fogblower moderator gagged me and then bragged about it on Fogbow. Thanks for posting that so we can see who “interested bystander” claims are sock-puppets who needed a rest...
And people might note that I was accused of posting the thread in “Breaking News”, even though Brown Deer posted a link showing that it was in bloggers where I put it and those posts CANNOT be put in “breaking news”. So some moderator - presumably the same one who gagged me, if that was the moderator on duty at the time - moved it to Breaking and then the sock puppets tried saying I had done that before and had been warned (you know, setting me up to be banned...).
My life has been too busy looking for the things my husband has lost, running shower water for him, trying to convince him that I’m his wife, etc... for me to sort through the old analyses again, but I am hopeful that the real truth will eventually get dealt with, with or without my help. My goal all along - in all the research I’ve done - is to help however I can and then pass the information on to a diligent law enforcement body that will truly get to the bottom of it. Have to take a number if I want justice done on this, since there are probably at least a dozen scandals that have been whitewashed in the last 10 years or so.
Removing the masks of the players is a big part of getting to the bottom of all this stuff. Thanks for posting the links that will help people to unmask the sockpuppets.
So one of our Moderators is a Leftist plant, here only to discredit Free Republic? This is HUGE and probably ought to have it's own thread.
Nobody can uncover conspiracies like you, Butter.
A “Zola” who threatened on my blog that my husband would have to lose his job if I didn’t stop my Fuddy research (and that happened after my husband and daughter were both poisoned), and who threatened to get into my computer (and that happened, as well as a very strategic email, known only to the FAA as being so strategic, being deleted at the server level).... claimed to be a freeper friendly to the eligibility issue, somebody posing as my friend. On the fogbow - an anti-FR site - “interested bystander” bragged about the ultimatums he/she issued to me on the blog, thereby outing him/herself as being both fogblower “interested bystander” and “Zola”.
Right after I was gagged at FR during the “Part Two” thread, “interested bystander” bragged on fogbow about giving his/her “sockpuppets” at FR a rest from that thread.
It’s not my conspiracy. It’s the fogbow’s. You should hear them belittle the Freepers over there. And they sometimes worry that they might let their Freeper masks slip from time to time.
Not sure what they think of “interested bystander” (used to be Quinn) threatening that my husband would lose his job if I didn’t shut up about this “crazy, easily-disproven conspiracy” - shortly before my husband and daughter experienced heavy metal symptoms which eventually led us to chelation testing that revealed massive amounts of lead in their body tissues. The crooks ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS threaten the families. They know that patriots don’t really care so much what happens to themselves, but patriots love their families
Sick.
They themselves make the threats and boast about controlling the “sockpuppets” here at FR. It’s their “conspiracy”, not mine.
Sorry about the formatting. It’s C&P’ed from my blog administration page so it must have html in it that I can’t find.
If you look at it and say, “Yikes! Blah blah blah”, you probably have the right attitude anyway.
With all the proof out there right now, about how compromised and non-credible the “mainstream media” is, I cannot fathom somebody on a conservative, truth-seeking site trying to get rid of any postings that are not taken from the mainstream media.
If fake news or unsupported theories aren’t posted in a place like FR where earnest thinkers can find out and debunk them, then how are those things ever supposed to be debunked? And if true news and supported theories are not allowed here, then where the heck are they ever going to see the light of day? Why do the FR powers-that-be not trust Freepers to rebut what is fake and confirm what is supported by evidence?
This whole philosophy of having the moderators decide what can be posted based on what is “embarrassing to the site and to conservatives” only serves to keep the fake news from being debunked, and to keep the MSM monopoly on wide dissemination of information. Is that really what FR is trying to do?
That IP address after Zola’s email is based in London:
http://ip-address-lookup-v4.com/lookup.php?host=ip-address-lookup-v4.com&ip=86.157.39.252&x=58&y=31
Why would they get involved in resesrch into a state health directors death?
IP addresses can be faked.
It does make a poor cover story though, doesn’t it?
You missed several other butt-hurt blogwhines about me, better than the one you posted.
Want me to dig 'em up for you? They're pretty entertaining.
Zola remembered to use the British spelling; for example “favour” instead of “favor”.
Not hard to do if you’re paid to have a cover. The deep state isn’t TOTALLY incompetent.
This gal lies all over the place. And the screeds are classic psy-op stuff. Gnats buzzing around the eyes.
In that set of emails is a postal code, SE3 0QL.
It is a post code in London.
85 people live there:
https://www.postcode.directory/postcode/se3-0ql/1268123
Street for that post code is Eliot Place.
And along with the post code was a name ending in -ton.
A publishing company Milton Publishing at #9:
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/Mh9JEqSWBrZo54bWs_k_42_rf7I/appointments
How did you find this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.