A “Zola” who threatened on my blog that my husband would have to lose his job if I didn’t stop my Fuddy research (and that happened after my husband and daughter were both poisoned), and who threatened to get into my computer (and that happened, as well as a very strategic email, known only to the FAA as being so strategic, being deleted at the server level).... claimed to be a freeper friendly to the eligibility issue, somebody posing as my friend. On the fogbow - an anti-FR site - “interested bystander” bragged about the ultimatums he/she issued to me on the blog, thereby outing him/herself as being both fogblower “interested bystander” and “Zola”.
Right after I was gagged at FR during the “Part Two” thread, “interested bystander” bragged on fogbow about giving his/her “sockpuppets” at FR a rest from that thread.
It’s not my conspiracy. It’s the fogbow’s. You should hear them belittle the Freepers over there. And they sometimes worry that they might let their Freeper masks slip from time to time.
Not sure what they think of “interested bystander” (used to be Quinn) threatening that my husband would lose his job if I didn’t shut up about this “crazy, easily-disproven conspiracy” - shortly before my husband and daughter experienced heavy metal symptoms which eventually led us to chelation testing that revealed massive amounts of lead in their body tissues. The crooks ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS threaten the families. They know that patriots don’t really care so much what happens to themselves, but patriots love their families
Sick.
They themselves make the threats and boast about controlling the “sockpuppets” here at FR. It’s their “conspiracy”, not mine.
Right after I was gagged at FR during the Part Two thread, interested bystander bragged on fogbow about giving his/her sockpuppets at FR a rest from that thread.
That's all pretty interesting, butterdezillion, as that just happens to the paradigm of how a certain very malicious group conducts their threats against people before they then execute the threat if the person doesn't cease the behavior that was pointed out. Their belief about that rationale--if it could be called that--is to flip the blame of actually executing the threat onto the recipient rather than the doer of the threat/punishment.
Such an executed penalty wouldn't exonerate a perpetrator within our Constitutional justice system, but it purportedly does within their group. Using that threat paradigm is a characteristic calling card of the group.
The collusion of multiple government agencies involved in this hoax is very important, of course, so I'm especially glad you have all the relevant documentation for this.