Skip to comments.
Rep Peter King: Moore Must ‘Prove His Innocence’ or ‘Step Down’
Breitbart ^
| 10 Nov 2017
| PAM KEY
Posted on 11/11/2017 5:52:54 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Friday on MSNBC, Rep. Peter King (R-NY) said Alabama Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore should prove his innocence of sexual abuse accusations or step down.
King said, Ordinarily, the person is entitled to the presumption of innocence. But in this case, its so serious, and the fact its backed up by other women, and its so hideous, I would say unless he can prove his innocence, the burden is on him within the next day, or so, he should step down. He owes it to the state and the U.S. Senate.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: peterking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s possible that Peter King has had sexual congress with a llama.
Or so I’ve heard.
He needs to prove his innocence or step down.
21
posted on
11/11/2017 6:05:55 PM PST
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“I heard Pete raped and murdered is high school girlfriend.
He most prove his innocence or resign now! “
I didn’t hear about that one. But I DID hear that Peter King once ate a former homosexual roommate of Lindsey Graham. Peter King must prove his innocence due to the seriousness of the charge.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
But in this case, its so serious, and the fact its backed up by other women, and its so hideous
I'm pretty sure that Peter King just gave liberals a new tactic to get people they don't like out of office or away from running for office.
Just make up an accusation, and "find" others to back up that story, and then another, and another, etc, until the number becomes the "proof". So, the real facts won't matter at that point. It's like the anti-Trump dossier. Fabricate the dossier, and give it "unquestionable" credibility by getting 17 intelligence officials to back up the story in the dossier.
Peter King does not strike me as having common sense behind his statements.
23
posted on
11/11/2017 6:06:59 PM PST
by
adorno
To: MayflowerMadam
Remember King voting against Clinton’s impeachment, He’s basically a Democrat in sheep’s clothing.
24
posted on
11/11/2017 6:07:41 PM PST
by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And King should prove that he is a constitutional conservative and not a RINO or he should step down?
25
posted on
11/11/2017 6:08:50 PM PST
by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: burghguy
Exactly! Alabama citizens determine if Judge Moore is elected, not the GOPe who hate him.
26
posted on
11/11/2017 6:10:23 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
27
posted on
11/11/2017 6:11:05 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If he did do anything with a 14yr old it was probably legal in Alabama in 1979 anyway.
28
posted on
11/11/2017 6:11:25 PM PST
by
lewislynn
( Transgender: A person who thinks s/he's wrong side out.)
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If the charges disappear after he is elected, I guess they didn’t matter.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Tell that to Senator Menendez.
31
posted on
11/11/2017 6:13:32 PM PST
by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: Vendome
Ohhhhh. I have not seen that one. That is easy too funny. Lol.
32
posted on
11/11/2017 6:16:07 PM PST
by
hawkaw
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Peter King is a Uniparty apparachik.
33
posted on
11/11/2017 6:17:24 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. It is the accuser who must PROVE his accusations.
35
posted on
11/11/2017 6:17:57 PM PST
by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: Vendome
37
posted on
11/11/2017 6:18:43 PM PST
by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
OK, guilty until proven innocent, got it!
What a p*tz!
38
posted on
11/11/2017 6:21:33 PM PST
by
PTBAA
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: Sasparilla
King said, Ordinarily, the person is entitled to the presumption of innocence. But in this case, its so serious, and the fact its backed up by other women, and its so hideous, I would say unless he can prove his innocence, the burden is on him within the next day, or so, he should step down....I am aghast this so-called Constitutional officer said such a heinous thing. Unbelievable.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson