Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: doug from upland
2 posted on
10/17/2017 11:39:42 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: doug from upland
She does tend to pudge a bit.
3 posted on
10/17/2017 11:39:53 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: doug from upland
Didn’t bother her then: why does it bother her all of a sudden?
4 posted on
10/17/2017 11:40:53 AM PDT by
ex91B10
To: doug from upland
Name names Jennifer.
Otherwise this is all just virtue signaling and propaganda.
5 posted on
10/17/2017 11:41:42 AM PDT by
Skywise
To: doug from upland
That’s Mother Nature’s revenge for you voting for Hilliary...............
7 posted on
10/17/2017 11:43:14 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
To: doug from upland
Yes, it’s disgusting.
But, she did this voluntarily in search of a movie career. She could have chosen a different career path and avoided the humiliation.
8 posted on
10/17/2017 11:43:18 AM PDT by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: doug from upland
pictures or it didn’t happen. These people are scum, they all got rich because they really didn’t care. Suddenly these people destroyed them?
To: doug from upland
Pics or it didn’t happen.
10 posted on
10/17/2017 11:44:16 AM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: doug from upland
So why did you do it, Jennifer?And where were your parents?
11 posted on
10/17/2017 11:44:49 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(Those who want to repeat history try to prevent others from knowing it.)
To: doug from upland
Is it too late to remind her to put on some more IQ points?
14 posted on
10/17/2017 11:45:35 AM PDT by
MortMan
(NFL kneelers: A colonoscopy is not supposed to be a self-exam.)
To: doug from upland
She wasn't involuntary "placed" into a nude line-up. She went along with a humiliating process to get or keep a particular acting job.
She could have refused and possibly lost the job or refused and possibly changed the female producer's mind.
Or she could have reconsidered her options and gone into honest work instead of acting.
To: doug from upland
Was she kidnapped and forced to appear in that nude lineup? If not, it wasn't abuse. It was a career choice, one which gave her unfair advantage over women who refused to participate.
(Mine might not be a typical "gal" view. I'm very uncomfortable with people who come forward in situations like this. Delayed-reaction outrage seems so cynical in most cases)
18 posted on
10/17/2017 11:48:23 AM PDT by
grania
(Deplorable and Proud of It!)
To: doug from upland
You aren’t particularly attractive either way, babe.
19 posted on
10/17/2017 11:48:40 AM PDT by
chris37
(Take a week off racist >;-)
To: doug from upland
stood at the lecternHere's the amazing thing about this article. The writer knows the difference between a lectern and a podium!
20 posted on
10/17/2017 11:49:40 AM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: doug from upland
When I was much younger and starting out, I was told by producers of a film to lose 15 pounds in two weeks, A PRIME factor that actresses get hired for is their physical appearance. I'm going to guess that this incident was related to her trying out for the part of Mystique in the X-Men films, in which she had to appear NAKED except for body paint.
YES, being even slightly pudgy was not going to work out.
21 posted on
10/17/2017 11:50:32 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: doug from upland
These people don’t realize that this continuing landslide of revelations about the depravity of Hollywood is not making the American public more sympathetic to them, it is making us less sympathetic to them.
They constantly degrade our values, our lifestyles, our religion... should we trade in our way of life for the disgusting moral septic tank in which they have voluntarily sunk themselves?
22 posted on
10/17/2017 11:51:20 AM PDT by
caligatrux
(Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
To: doug from upland
At one point in the interview, Lawrence said this:
Im still learning that I dont have to smile when a man makes me uncomfortable, she added. Every human being should have the power to be treated with respect because theyre human.
Her takeaway from all this is that she doesn’t always have to smile? It’s very easy for her to say, “F* Donald Trump”, but someone tries to rape her she will in the future not smile?
She’s an idiot.
24 posted on
10/17/2017 11:52:10 AM PDT by
Vic S
To: doug from upland
OK, this confirms it.
All these late-comer “#MeToo”ers are extremely shallow and self-centered.
25 posted on
10/17/2017 11:52:55 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = USSR; Journ0List + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey)
To: doug from upland
“female producer had me do a nude lineup”
How does someone convince you that this is a good idea?
I look back at my young self and now way would I go through something like this for any job. Maybe its a Hollywood thing? If this was the first thing you had to do wouldn’t it be a good time to find another profession>
To: doug from upland
There’s an abundance of reasons to hate Hollywood and Jennifer Lawrence is one of them.
Jennifer should remember that everything she ever did in Hollywood, including that photo shoot, still exists in someone’s collection.
28 posted on
10/17/2017 11:55:41 AM PDT by
Bullish
(Whatever it takes to MAGA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson