I'm not the "conspiracy type" but with new news on the central narrative of the Las Vegas shooting, sad, for me, alternative scenarios are worth pondering.
Cliff Kincaid is a great writer, once in awhile, he can get out there but I think this still merits a read. I'm sure we will learn other things in the coming days.
Again, I think it might be worth a reading of the full article in the link.
Oy!
The guy’s motive was one of four things:
1. A homegrown Jihadi.
2. A rabid leftist.
3. A guy who was nuts.
4. All of the above.
Any coverup of motives is simply the media and demonratic run FBI covering their political a**. The last thing the left wants is an unambiguous leftist terrorist who was literally trying to gun down Trump supporters.
It really isn’t very hard to understand.
I was just about to type in another thread that the whole thing has the feel of a plan gone FUBAR. It’s hard to say more than that with the info available.
200-proof, double-dip bullscheisse!
“Informant gone bad” is usually the cover story for “agent that did what we told them to do”.
One fact is certain ... the shooter is NOT right wing or the media would go 24/7
Regrettably the article seems to be all thinly cross-checked speculation.
It does not account for the amateur potshots at the jet fuel tanks, for example, and also the amount of “explosives” found in the car was relatively small and available through retail outlets. Nothing in the article explains why the guns were brought into the hotel if they were to be sold since it is a hassle lugging them around and all of that is better done at a no-tell motel with no or fewer video cameras.
It is worthwhile to consider the informant gone bad conjecture but imho it would need to fit relatively effortlessly (with cross checking) into what we already seem to know.
Head of FBI Las Vegas is John Podesta’s son in law.
Until and unless I see CCTV footage of Paddock rolling baggage carts into his room, the government is hiding something. Hididing something that reflects badly on them.
The moon “may” be made of Moose-Cheese.
How would a sting look?
Lots of guns. Check
Cameras. Check
Operative with zero social media footprint. Check
Strange police response. Check
Zero surveillance footage. Check
Strange check in times and stories. Check
This seems as likely as a multi-millionaire shooting up a music festival for fun.
Soros put 1,350,000 shares of MGM.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ISIS CLAIM ???
The media coverage on this is truly bizarre. Here you have the “Muzzi” ISIS claiming involvement showing up everywhere in the UK press but gets buried here in the US. Even in this posting which has thus far well over 100 replys and of those replys I didn’t see many that brought this up.
Why wont they ? Perhaps it’s because according to their codex known as Sharia the actions taken by Paddock has been sanctioned by Almighty God.
Because most political perverts don’t believe in such a thing as God they can’t concieve of followers of Islam believing in what they are doing is actually serving God. It must be something else.
So the progressive perverts running the show avoid bringing that up and blame guns. By not confronting this the carnage continues .
Duped into killing 60 and wounding 600?
That’s not logical.
This is what I still believe. He was showing weapons to ISIS under the pretense that he had converted. He had a bacon sandwich in his room, the ISIS buyers killed him, and then fired on the crowd.
Here’s the crazy part. The top 5 floors of Mandalay Bay is owned by the Saudis, so they may never have even had to run away.
.
I always thought spraying the concert with bullets was a plan b.
The security guard stumbled upon a room full of guns, ammo, cellphones, electronics and who knows what else.
The guy who rented the room had to die. The attack of the concert attendees a diversion.
What was the original plan or target?
Where are the other terrorists?