Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confusing the Evolution Debate (Most Americans would not object to all sides being taught)
American Thinker ^ | 10/04/2017 | Mike Konrad

Posted on 10/04/2017 7:06:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Of all the Western nations, Americans are the least likely to believe in evolution, according to a recent survey. Still, some applauded when even more recent statistics apparently showed that support for creationism had dropped below 40% in America. Still, at 38%, one has to wonder how precise those numbers are.

America has had a history of fundamentalist Protestantism. The Puritans were not like the wavering Anglicans whom they fled. Nor would they take suggestions from the Pope. This streak has informed our country from its inception. And, contrary to present disdain, that influence was often for the good. A substantial number of those fundamentalists, especially Baptists, supported the American Revolution.

New polling data show that for the first time in a long time there’s a notable decline in the percentage of Americans -- including Christians -- who hold to the “Young Earth” creationist view that humankind was created in its present form in the past 10,000 years, evolution playing no part.

According to a Gallup poll conducted in May, the portion of the American public taking this position now stands at 38%, a new low in Gallup’s periodic surveys. -- USA Today

However, it has to be remembered that what has been reduced is literal creationism. A lot of Americans are otherwise bible-believing Christians who just understand the opening chapters of Genesis to be metaphorical. They otherwise accept Jesus, the Trinity, and the atoning work on the cross.

Europeans, by contrast, have chiefly embraced standard evolution as established fact. Even formerly religious Ireland is way ahead of the USA in acceptance of naturalistic evolution.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Education; History; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: education; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: JimSEA

If you are defining evolution as “survival of the fittest,” no problem. But are you defining it as all life came from the primordial ooze? If so, you are really on thin ice. Or maybe you are one of the evolutionists who will not address from whence came the universe? It just appeared out of nowhere from nothing? Talk about having faith!


41 posted on 10/07/2017 6:00:19 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Evolution deals with change in living plants, animals, etc. abiogenesis deals with the origin of life. Evolution has been happening as long as there has been life and deals only with living things. The origin of the universe and changes there aren’t a subject for evolution. My interest in geology led to my interest in evolution and it leads to my acceptance of evolution. I don’t know enough about cosmology if you will to form more than a superficial opinion.


42 posted on 10/07/2017 10:04:51 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk

Quite right: either all of scripture is true, or none of it...

4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by ~every~ word of God.

16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

So, when God says there was evening and there was morning, the first day...sad that people really think God does not understand the ramifications of what he said or does not mean what he says.


43 posted on 10/08/2017 8:20:59 PM PDT by mbj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Oh, there is controversy...even among evolutionists, there is not agreement: do you still read scientific material very often?


44 posted on 10/08/2017 8:28:44 PM PDT by mbj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mbj

The so called evolution controversy is a phenomenon caused by the incompatiblity between science and religion. Within science there is no controversy. That’s why evolution is referred to as a theory. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not “guesses” but reliable accounts of the real world. Take, for instance, the theory of gravity. Wikipedia can give you all of this.


45 posted on 10/08/2017 8:56:10 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK
My answer is: how could we not see His works?

Bingo.


46 posted on 10/09/2017 6:21:54 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Thanks!


47 posted on 10/09/2017 8:50:25 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

You are willfully blind, man.


48 posted on 10/11/2017 5:16:02 PM PDT by mbj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Nor would they take suggestions from the Pope.

LOL! "'Die Protestant heretic!,' he suggested."

49 posted on 10/11/2017 5:27:30 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson