Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: Meghan and Harry will announce their Engagement this DECEMBER to avoid Clashing [Trunc]
Daily Mail (U.K.) ^ | August 23, 2017 | Martha Cliff

Posted on 08/23/2017 1:12:56 PM PDT by Cecily

As their relationship heats up so do rumours of their engagement with the world eagerly anticipating the marriage of Prince Harry to girlfriend Meghan Markle.

And while some predicted that the royal might pop the question on Meghan's birthday at the beginning of August royal insiders predict that we could be looking at a Christmas proposal.

Former chef to Princess Diana and her two sons Darren McGrady anticipates that the couple will announce their marriage plans this December.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
We will announce in July, no August, no October, no December!

I don't get this waiting to announce an engagement mentality. If they are engaged, announce it today. How does an announcement interfere with any other celebrations? It's all so stupid, but I guess these stories get clicks (like mine).

1 posted on 08/23/2017 1:12:56 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cecily
Former chef to Princess Diana...Darren McGrady anticipates that the couple will announce their marriage plans this December.

You really couldn't get a more authoritative source than that.

2 posted on 08/23/2017 1:17:33 PM PDT by j. earl carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
They don't know and yes, it IS all just "click-bait".

OTOH...should Harry be stupid enough to marry her, it'll be a worse thing than the Wallace Simpson bit. But then, Harry has the IQ and emotional stability of a Bonobo.

3 posted on 08/23/2017 1:19:56 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

The Queen must approve any nuptials...................


4 posted on 08/23/2017 1:20:44 PM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

My family left England in 1690, so color me uninterested.


5 posted on 08/23/2017 1:25:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

His father must be proud though.


6 posted on 08/23/2017 1:31:00 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Don't check the news, check Cernovich on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
Why buy the cow...? Weekend of August 31st, 2002

As I look around, I see more and more young girls, in their early teens, giving away the precious gift of their virginity at younger and younger ages to less and less desirable men. Which leads me to the question of, "Why buy the cow, when you can get the milk for nothing?".

Back seventy years ago and earlier, families in the USA had their own milk cows, having a cow for milk, was not easy. It meant getting up early to milk her, cleaning her stall, feeding her, seeing her through sick times and protecting her from thieves and wild animals. So often times, when the cow would give to much milk for the family to use, they would give or sell the excess milk. The reason being, there were many who would not go to the trouble of owning a cow, so they would rather buy milk than go through the trouble and work of owning their own cow. As a result, the saying came about, "Why buy the cow, when you can buy the milk or get the milk for free?". We still use this saying today, but today, it has nothing to do with cows, but instead has to do with girls and their willingness to sexually satisfy every Tom, Dick and Harry for nothing more than a scratch behind the ears and a "good girl". Today, the question would be more aptly phrased, "Why get married and put up with her temperament and quirks when she'll give me all the sexual satisfaction I want for a simple scratch behind the ears and a 'good girl'?".

Now, I understand why young Christian men and women get married, but for the life of me, I can't think of any good reasons for unsaved, heathen, promiscuous, men and women get married. For I just come back to the same question. If she says yes to every guy who says hi to her, why would anyone want to marry her? Think about it, why did God create marriage in the first place? Did He not create marriage for the sole purpose of creating families? A mom to have children and a Dad to protect and support them? Why did God give girls a positive sign of virginity? God did it as a special wedding gift one that no other could duplicate and one that no one could get more than one of? Yet, many unsaved girls treat it with no more respect than anything else their bodies expels.

So, why do heathen men today buy the cow when the milk is so readily available free? I don't know, but this I do know. Today's secular marriages are a long way from the marriages that God ordained. And we the small Born Again Washed in the blood of the Lamb Christian community, must pray for the children of such unholy secular unions, for the children are the result, for the most part, not of love, but of lust.

Now, why is it that girls have become so loose? So promiscuous? So easy? So willing to satisfy men sexually for nothing more than a "good girl" and scratch behind the ears? So ready to risk AIDS, HIV, syphilis, herpes, and a host of other sexual disease? So willing to put themselves in a position to kill their little baby in their womb?

That question I can answer! Fathers and preachers! When was the last time, you as a dad took the bull by the horns so to speak and told your daughter that you expect her to be a virgin the day she gets married? When was the last time you heard the importance of virginity preached from the pulpit of your family church? As God gave your daughter her virginity, so did He also give you the responsibility of raising her. God has not only made you her father, He has made you responsible for her spiritual upbringing as well. You as the man of the house are also the direct representative Christ of the house. You are to do for your family what Christ did for His church. And that includes teaching, preaching and living a life that reflects Christ in you.

So, who is to blame for little girls 12 and 13 years old bing tramps, whores and worse? Those poor girl's fathers, the preacher in the pulpit and to a lesser degree mothers are to blame. It is through their laziness, lack of morals, hatred of God and His Word, and their refusal to take responsibility that we now have girls treating their virginity and self respect with contempt. Now, shall I say, God forgive them? God forbid!

What I will say is, it is not too late, turn to the Lord today for His help and take your place at the head of the family. Do not expect it to be easy, for satan will not give up your wife, your daughters and yours sons easily. Nor will satan give you up easily. And to that I will add, and may our Lord and Saviour, Christ Jesus be with you and help you, may He give you the strength you'll need and may He remember that He has promised us that He will allow us to bear no more than He knows we can handle and help you to understand and know that He will be with you and He will protect you and He will not allow satan to do any more to you than Jesus knows you can handle.

But, remember this: No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. (Luke 16:13)

No, you cannot serve both God and satan and neither can your sons and daughters. Men, it is time to stop trying to be her best friend and start being her father!

7 posted on 08/23/2017 1:32:58 PM PDT by Bob Celeste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

His father is more intelligent than Harry is; IF you are calling Prince Charles his father....AN D that isn’t really saying much.


8 posted on 08/23/2017 1:34:08 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

At least he’s not marrying a german.


9 posted on 08/23/2017 1:38:39 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Didn’t we fight a war not to have to care about this? It’s an insult to our forefathers.


10 posted on 08/23/2017 1:41:02 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

This will turn out like Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew, only worse.


11 posted on 08/23/2017 1:43:56 PM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

“At least he’s not marrying a german.”

Or another guy.


12 posted on 08/23/2017 1:56:36 PM PDT by Andy'smom (Proud member of the basket of deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

That would be better! ;^)


13 posted on 08/23/2017 2:01:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
Yes, much, much, much, MUCH worse and faster!

Fergie got Diana to join in and do really STUPID things.

I doubt that Kate will follow suit; this time around; should Harry actually EVER marry the god digging tramp.

14 posted on 08/23/2017 2:03:19 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe these kids can get married on the field at Super Bowl half-time.
Then America can shun two birds with one stone. Or something.


15 posted on 08/23/2017 2:14:02 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
I don't get this waiting to announce an engagement mentality.

I agree.

16 posted on 08/23/2017 2:20:03 PM PDT by Tax-chick (You can't read all day if you don't start early in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

You don’t have to care. I don’t care. However, I am amused.


17 posted on 08/23/2017 2:23:39 PM PDT by Tax-chick (You can't read all day if you don't start early in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

” go(l)d digging tramp”

Why do you say that?


18 posted on 08/23/2017 2:37:28 PM PDT by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Unassuaged
Because I know the tramp's history! Do you?

There was an article, a while back, that said that she had "fashioned herself on Diana"; which is very weird...especially because she is now trying her darndest to look like Kate and/or Pippa.

19 posted on 08/23/2017 2:39:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
Time was, we had rulz around here.


20 posted on 08/23/2017 3:16:33 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson