Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah Barracuda
From the NY Daily News:

The women — made up of his former and current network co-workers — were able to identify Bolling as the sender behind the lewd photos because they recognized his phone number, according to the news site.One of the recipients said she told Bolling to never send her such messages again, but didn’t receive a reply.

His lawyer's response is weirdly worded, at least it seems to me:

“Mr. Bolling recalls no such inappropriate communications, does not believe he sent any such communications and will vigorously pursue his legal remedies for any false and defamatory accusations that are made,” he told HuffPost.

11 posted on 08/04/2017 7:17:47 PM PDT by CaptainK (No collusion.No obstruction.He's a leaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: CaptainK

Ya.... the “I don’t recall” line is lame. Find it hard to believe he would do this though. Without concrete proof.... I’m calling it BS leftist smear.


17 posted on 08/04/2017 7:24:48 PM PDT by Godebert (CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: CaptainK
Seriously. He "recalls no such inappropriate communications...." and "does not believe he sent any such communications....."

Ummm, for this type of behavior, you would know whether you did or did not. If you didn't do it, the lawyer would be saying "He DID NOT do it!". "See you in court!"

"and will vigorously pursue his legal remedies for any false and defamatory accusations that are made"

It will be somewhat telling if he doesn't pursue any legal remedies. Time will tell. I don't have a good feeling about this one, based on, as you said, the weirdly worded statement from the attorney.

19 posted on 08/04/2017 7:29:39 PM PDT by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: CaptainK

Sounds like Bolling was using a “burner” phone for some action on the side. I seriously doubt he was sending those pics on his work number. The “ladies” most likely are lying here.


23 posted on 08/04/2017 7:39:42 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: CaptainK
“Mr. Bolling recalls no such inappropriate communications, does not believe he sent any such communications and will vigorously pursue his legal remedies for any false and defamatory accusations that are made,” he told HuffPost.

I agree with you about the odd wording. "Does not believe" makes it sound like he has sent pictures before but doesn't recall sending it to them.

I hope that this isn't true, though. I like Eric Bolling on Fox, so it would be a shame if he did this.

76 posted on 08/04/2017 10:52:47 PM PDT by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2017/05/tips-for-trump-beating-russia-narrative.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: CaptainK
"His lawyer's response is weirdly worded, at least it seems to me:"

Sorry to break the news to you, but this is S.O.P. (Standard Operating Procedure) a.k.a. Boiler Plate response.

And now for the money quote:
"will vigorously pursue his legal remedies for any
false and defamatory accusations that are made,
"

80 posted on 08/04/2017 11:40:07 PM PDT by Stanwood_Dave ("Testilying." Cop's don't lie, they just Testily{ing} as taught in their respected Police Academy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: CaptainK

Very poorly worded response. I mean, it sounds like he may have done this, but can’t recall? When are we talking, like twenty five years ago?


93 posted on 08/05/2017 5:00:31 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Rudy Guiuliani for Head of FBI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson