Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CaptainK
Seriously. He "recalls no such inappropriate communications...." and "does not believe he sent any such communications....."

Ummm, for this type of behavior, you would know whether you did or did not. If you didn't do it, the lawyer would be saying "He DID NOT do it!". "See you in court!"

"and will vigorously pursue his legal remedies for any false and defamatory accusations that are made"

It will be somewhat telling if he doesn't pursue any legal remedies. Time will tell. I don't have a good feeling about this one, based on, as you said, the weirdly worded statement from the attorney.

19 posted on 08/04/2017 7:29:39 PM PDT by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Diverdogz

It’s lawyer speak, and not in a good way.


20 posted on 08/04/2017 7:31:23 PM PDT by CaptainK (No collusion.No obstruction.He's a leaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Diverdogz

I like Bolling but that’s a strange statement for an innocent man. Are they setting him up to say he might have been drunk or something and there’s a possibility it could have happened. Just a weak statement from a lawyer. It didn’t take Sean Hannity five minutes to raise Holy hell on national TV when he was accused. He denied everything and said he would sue the hell out of anyone who claimed he had did something inappropriate. That was the end of that. Bolling has went out of his way to project himself as a God-fearing man who has the highest of integrity. Maybe he’s innocent of these allegations. I hope so. Fox is going downhill fast and doesn’t need more of this garbage for CNN and MSNBC to obsess about for the next week. But based on his lawyer’s statement it doesn’t look good.


32 posted on 08/04/2017 7:54:33 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("Man without God descends into madness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Diverdogz

Agreed.


49 posted on 08/04/2017 8:25:00 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Diverdogz

Oh Lordy, not another one.


85 posted on 08/05/2017 1:53:29 AM PDT by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Diverdogz
Ummm, for this type of behavior, you would know whether you did or did not.

Exactly. If it was me, I know without a doubt this was false, because I have no such pictures on my phone or anywhere else for that matter.

91 posted on 08/05/2017 4:41:17 AM PDT by corlorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson