Posted on 08/03/2017 12:44:53 PM PDT by heterosupremacist
Britain has made its priorities clear: offending Muslims and Islam is far, far more serious than jihad terror or the sexual abuse of Infidel girls.
To move strongly against such crimes would be “Islamophobic.” The British authorities have made their taste for jihad terrorists, and disdain for their foes, abundantly clear. While I am banned from the country for the crime of noting — correctly — that Islam has doctrines of warfare against unbelievers, Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain.
The UK Home Office recently admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.”
May’s government also admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
Where does having an 11-year-old girl carry bacon down the street outside of that mosque rank on that scale?
Oh? Worse than blowing up a bunch of kids at a concert? Worse than a muzzie plowing through people on a bridge? The UK has finally rolled over for islam; well, Europe has in actuality.
What is worse is that DemocRats would allow millions of Muslims to immigrate here with the lowest level of vetting.
Probably do hard time for child abuse and have Child Protective Services put your kid in a muslim foster home to learn tolerance...
Vetting for Jihad is impossible. It cannot be done. “Vetting” should never be suggested as a solution to Jihad importation.
Why? Because immigrants have children.
And as shown over and over again, the Muslim children of Muslim immigrants are often worse than their parents. Many or most of the Jihadists carrying out the sadistic slaughters in Europe and the USA lately have been second generation Muslims, born in the host countries they attacked.
The only solution to Jihad importation is to not import Muslims. Full stop. Zero. None. Don’t grow the jihad-candidate-pool of first, second and third generation Muslims. Be like Poland, Hungary and the Czech republic. Don’t be like France, Belgium and Britain.
This ass backward liberal world view will get a lot of people killed...
Having slow loads again.
“This ass backward liberal world view will get a lot of people killed...”
And revoke permanent residency and citizenship of those here. Adopt Japan’s Muslim ban. Muslims are not allowed to purchase property or become permanent residents or become citizens. In other words, come in, visit, do your business, and go back to the Muslim shit hole you came from.
What would these Muzzies do if a dog were to pee on the Mosque door? Would they rape it like they do a 11 year-old girl. Maybe not, but if it was a sheep . . .
The DemocRats will always blame someone other than Muslims. They are absolutely stupid and blind when it comes to the dangers of allowing Islam to take root in the country.
The Izzy’s have already taken root in this country starting with 9/11 then Ft. Hood, TX, etc.
What about a crop-duster load of hot drippings with extra essence of hickory smoke added as an additional hint.
The only way England survives is for its’ people to make their leaders FEAR them by whatever means necessary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.