Republicans Will Throw the 2018 Election to Be Back in Minority...For Impeachment

Vanity | 8-2-17 | Self

[CincyRichieRich]

So this morning, watching ABC/MSNBC/CNN (8-2-17) only because it is what the commie gym manager has on, they are touting, “Trump’s history of trashing the GOP”...and some loser (R) Congressman, “Dent”, Pennsylvania...doesn’t matter who, just some loser anti-Trump goober who should be caned, like in Singapore.

After watching this, I have a theory.

I believe the R’s really want to be in the minority - and notice in the majority, they act the part anyway. Some time between now and November 2018, several R’s will somehow retire for “more time with their family”...Soros will have paid them off enough to make it worth it...losers (metaphorically and literally) will step in to run against a “D”. They will lose just like McCain purposely did in 2008. Or, some will just not drop out and lose like that anyway.

Then, with Mueller and the MSM, and the newly minted “D” majority, they’ll try to complete the coup against Trump with impeachment. Again, they will TRY, I am not saying succeed.

Just my theory. I’m not crazy and I don’t think this is too far-fetched. Soros has enough $ to make them believe it worth it - and their seemingly Sith-based-dark-side hate for Trump is that deep.

[FlyCaster]

Hasn't it been instructive to see anti-Trump Republicans in Congress work so closely and so zealously with the opposite party to unseat a duly-elected President?,

So many mutual perks to protect. So many (anti-American?) actions to hide from us -- the unwashed deplorable voter -- drumming his fingers on the table, patience running out.

[Junk Silver]

It’s not just your theory. Rick Wiles said much the same thing on last night’s “TruNews”. I think you’ve both nailed it.

The other side of this coin is the Democrat party’s new willingness to fund Pro-Life candidates. The Dems are hoping this will let them steal just enough Catholic voters away from Republicans in close states to take back some seats.

There is an enormous opportunity here for true conservatives to accept the RINO’s willingness to be defeated. I don’t think Trump will ever be impeached, but enough dust could be kicked up aftet 2018 to be a major distraction to his agenda.

[bigdaddy45]

who is “they”?? What member of congress willingly lost their seats? And why didn’t they willingly lose their seats in 2010 and 2014?

[JBW1949]

It will probably take that to get America back where she should be...I just don’t know if conservatives will do that...

Liberals have “group” mentality...That’s obvious with all the “protests” they do...

Conservatives have more of an “individualist” approach...We think for ourselves and do not follow “groupthink”...

It is harder for conservatives to gather enforce over issues...

[fortheDeclaration]

tin hat stuff.

[JBW1949]

“...The kicker is if we get Pro-Trump primary challengers to replace them...”

This is key...It is a necessity...

[arthurus]

A Congressman's number one job is to get securely wealthy. They must do everything for re-election because length of incumbency is worth money from Soros and the Chamber of Commerce crowd.
If they do lose an election after trying to win it they are rewarded with lifetime sinecures that keep them wealthy(so long as they have toed the line for Soros et al). If they step down at the behest of Soros and/or the Chamber for reasons of advancing an agenda ditto. The desire to be re-elected is conditional. Secure wealth is the goal. Election is a means but not the sole means.

[TakebackGOP]

The presidential nominees did.

[alternatives?]

“There is an enormous opportunity here for true conservatives to accept the RINO’s willingness to be defeated.”

The problem is many of the tea party candidates become establishment members when they win.

[bigdaddy45]

ahh.... so Romney threw the election. Got it.

[Vendome]

Mathematically impossible:

Deliver an even bigger majority in 2018 to set up redistricting in 2020.

Here are some real math numbers.

1st. 2018 is not going to end well for them. They have 25 seats up, with 11 vulnerable. Compare that to the Republicans who have only seats up with merely 2 vulnerable.

Let’s just say losing 30% cor the Dems would be a friggin disaster but, not as bad as 2020....more later.

2nd. SCOTUS...3 more turns at bat over the next 8 years.

3rd. Federal Judges. Over the next 7.5 years we will realign more than 1/2 or more than 700 Federal Judges and may even break up pesky courts like the 9th.

Hell, we could replace a few annoying judges in Hawaii.

4th. The Wall.

5th. Obamacare will be repealed.

6th. Lower Capital gains tax and offer enticing tax advantages to repatriate some of the $3 Trillion offshore and put that capital to work investing in factories and new business ideas.

This will invigorate the economy.

7th. 2020. Dems have 11 Senate seats up, compared to 22 for Republicans.

We probably have a net gain of 3 for the Senate.

All 435 seats in Congress are up but, if we can get the issues of healthcare coverage, The economy and the wall in progress as well at least SCOTUS we will probably have an increase in the house as well(I am still studying that batlefield and don’t have numbers yet)

So why all the fighting from the Dems and these charges which are no more than vapor?

Well, their product sucks. Its a stew of hate, Socialism/Marxist utopian ideals and more segregation of society by invented classes of aggrieved people.

But, the real kicker is this about Reapportionment. Can you say Entropy?

8. Yeah that’s right. With more wins under the belt of the Republicans we will have a larger swath of land to carve up because the census will take place, which the predicate for redistricting and guess who wins that fight no matter what?

Republicans and we get an increase in key states we will continue to win. Alabama, Georgia and Florida will gain 1 more representative in the house, who will likely be a Republican

However, Texas will gain 3 or 4 representatives locking up the south for Republicans over the next decade.

So, in 2020 we will gain further majorities in the house and senate, redistrict in our favor, we will be in the middle of an economy that out performs all other nations, 2 SCOTUS or more will be seated in our favor, 300-400 Federal judges are seated Obamacare/Check, Tax Policy/Check, The Wall/Check, Fair Trade/Check, ISIS Dead/Check, Russia petitions for statehood (jus kee dean), Trump Re-elected / Yuge Check.

And the dems wander the wilderness for 10 years because they stand zero chance of doing anything significant after 2020.

And the DNC is not only running an insane $3.5 million dollars in debt but, their fundraising is at the lowest in 14 years.

And they have no candidate for 2020 as yet but, their current financial or intellectual leadership.

Oh, and that Trump meme “ He’s going to step down!” Uhmmm...Boo Chit.

He’s already fundraising for his 2020 PAC with $12,000,000 cash on hand.

That’s right. After disbursements he’s got $12 million.

That’s debt free money.

Oh, and the RNC is cash flow positive with $44,000,000 in the bank.

I ask you, at this point, who is going to win?

Conclusion:
Democrats are so broke they can’t pay attention and have zero money to support any war but.

Cheap azz Chinese knockoff of an intellect.

So, get use to Donald Trump being president for 8 years

[Georgia Girl 2]

All indications are that the Dems will continue to lose seats in 2018. They have no message, no agenda and no leadership. At the moment the leaders of the Democrat party are the media.

[Roccus]

Don’t know anything about “Sith-based” anything, but I 100% believe the GOP capable of this.

[Seruzawa]

Slap me? I might like that.

[Kazan]

Whether they are intentionally sabotaging themselves or just dishonest and corrupt, conservatives can't sit out the election.

We need more Republicans in Congress that support the Trump agenda. That is especially a good thing if a few incumbents like Jeff Flake are defeated in the primaries.

[Ohioan]

Not crazy, but think that with the right counter moves, we can turn such a game around for our advantage.

In another thread, I noted your remarks on the bizarre behavior of our soap company. P & G was already committed to what became the PC Republican establishment (then the pro-Rockefeller, anti-Goldwater) movement, in the early 1960s. As one active in the Goldwater campaign, I can personally vouch for the fact that some of the P & G advertising department, who were working with us for Goldwater, got called on the carpet for even being seen with the undersigned and other known Conservatives in, I think, 1963.

Of course, P & G would never have gone anywhere near so far then, as what they have just produced. I think the latest shows the continuing influence of former CEO Pepper.

Bill Flax

[precisionshootist]

Being in the majority is a big problem for republicans as they lose the ability to hide their true nature behind democrats. Yes I agree with trump in office they would much prefer to be in the minority and I do think they are hoping that happens in the midterms. I don’t think any one office holder will intentionally lose but rather promote a loss of seats with the idea it won’t be them in particular.

[Leep]

The party in 2nd place still gets a good salary and perks.
And if you willing to sell out America you can make lots more money on the side.
So, why try...what’s the incentive ..i mean if you don’t give two craps for country.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

I’ve stated what you posit in only a slightly different way. If you’ve heard of the Harlem Globetrotters and know who they are, they are an exhibition basketball team. They need a “goof” team to play against, which has been for decades the Washington Generals.

The theory being, the job security of the G_trotters is exactly the same as that of the Generals. It’s actually easier to be the underdog in this kabuki theater...that way, you never actually have to get anything done and you can beg for $$ to “carry on the fight”.

I *believe* I have heard Rush express the “Harlem Globetrotter” theory but I can’t remember if I made it up and he took it or if I am repeating him. Either way, IMO it is valid.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

I strongly believe the Clintons established that exact operational modus and much of DC is and has been busy trying to emulate it for 20 years.