Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walgreens, Rite Aid asset purchase agreement could impact Upstate distribution jobs
Upstate Business Journal ^ | July 7, 2017 | Trevor Anderson

Posted on 07/10/2017 2:53:53 AM PDT by buckalfa

The fate of hundreds of distribution jobs in the Upstate could be decided during the next six months.

Two of the nation’s largest retail drug store chains — Illinois-based Walgreens Boot Alliance (WBA) and Pennsylvania-based Rite Aid Corp. — announced on Thursday, June 29, they had entered into a $5.175 billion asset purchase agreement.

Walgreens operates a nearly 700,000-square-foot distribution center at 101 Alliance Parkway in Anderson County, as well as a 500,000-square-foot distribution facility at 350 Raco Parkway in Jackson County, Ga. Both facilities employ hundreds of workers.

Rite Aid has its $90 million, 900,000-square-foot distribution center that it opened in May 2016 at 789 Flatwood Industrial Drive in Spartanburg County. The facility employs 600 people.

Walgreens and Rite Aid officials have not said whether the deal will result in the consolidation of these facilities. But they have also not said if all of the facilities will remain open if federal regulators approve the deal.

“We certainly hope the Spartanburg facility will remain open,” said Spartanburg County Councilman David Britt. “It’s a state-of-the-art facility. Johnson Development did an outstanding job. It’s well managed. [Employees have] proven themselves during the past year. If they choose to close, it will be unfortunate. But we have a lot of companies looking at Spartanburg County. I’m confident that facility wouldn’t be vacant for long. We would love to have Walgreens here in Spartanburg.”

The most recent agreement replaced a previous merger proposed in October 2015 that would have enabled WBA to acquire all outstanding shares of Rite Aid and to sell 865 stores and “certain other assets” to Fred’s Inc., headquartered in Tennessee.

“This new transaction extends our growth strategy and offers additional operational and financial benefits,” said Stefano Pessina, CEO of Walgreens, in a statement. “It will allow us to expand and optimize our retail pharmacy network in key markets in the U.S., including the Northeast, and provide customers and patients with greater access to convenient, affordable care. We believe this new transaction addresses competitive concerns previously raised with respect to the prior transaction and will streamline and simplify the transition for customers, team members and other stakeholders.”

Rite Aid said the decision to terminate the merger was made after it received feedback from the Federal Trade Commission that led it to believe “the parties would not have obtained FTC clearance to consummate the merger.”

Under the terms of the new agreement, Walgreens will purchase 2,186 Rite Aid stores primarily throughout the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Southeast. Walgreens did not say whether it plans to close stores.

The deal also includes three Rite Aid distribution centers in Dayville, Conn., Philadelphia, Penn., and Spartanburg County.

Rite Aid said it will provide certain transition services to Walgreens for up to three years after the transaction closes.

Walgreens will pay Rite Aid a $325 million termination fee related to the merger.

Fred’s said it will receive $25 million as reimbursement for expenses associated with the terminated merger.

“While we believe that pursuing the merger with WBA was the right thing to do for our investors and customers, this new agreement provides a clear path forward and positions Rite Aid as a strong, independent, multi-regional drugstore chain and pharmacy benefits manager with a compelling footprint in key markets,” said Rite Aid Chairman and CEO John Standley, in a statement. “The transaction offers clear solutions to assist us in addressing our pharmacy margin challenges and allows us to significantly reduce debt, resulting in a strong balance sheet and improved financial flexibility moving forward.”

Rite Aid and Walgreens said the agreement is subject to approval under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and other customary closing conditions, but does not require a shareholder vote.

The companies said they expect the agreement to close in about six months.

Rite Aid said it will continue to operate EnvisionRx, its pharmacy benefit manager; RediClinic; and Health Dialog.

Walgreens spokesman Phil Caruso declined to comment on his company’s plans for the three distribution centers in the Upstate and Georgia.

“It’s still very early in the process,” Caruso said.

A Rite Aid employee at the Spartanburg County facility said he and his coworkers were told their jobs are secure.

Rite Aid signed a 15-year lease on the facility, which sits on almost 97 acres of Spartanburg-based Johnson Development’s more than 1,400-acre Flatwood Industrial Park.

Johnson Development sold Rite Aid’s facility in April for nearly $65 million to Bel Flatwood LLC, an affiliate of a fund managed by the global firm Eaton Vance.

A spokesman for Eaton Vance said the lease includes expansion capability. He said the facility is “a great asset” and the company believes it will remain open for “many years to come.”

Walgreens has one year remaining on the 10-year lease it signed for the distribution facility it opened in 2008 in Jackson County, Ga.

Property records showed the company owns the distribution center it opened in 2007 in Anderson County.

Economic development officials in Anderson County could not be reached for comment.

Jim Shaw, president and CEO of the Jackson County Area Chamber of Commerce, said he had not yet heard from Walgreens, but he hopes the company will choose to keep the facility open.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News
KEYWORDS: antitrust; ma; sc
Should government go further in regulating merger and acquisition activities that have the potential to eliminate jobs or are these events the proper function of somewhat free markets allocating capital to its highest and best use?
1 posted on 07/10/2017 2:53:54 AM PDT by buckalfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Antitrust laws are arguably a legitimate governmental action. What percentage of the Rx drug market would Walgreens/Rite-Aid, CVS, and Wal-Mart have?


2 posted on 07/10/2017 3:01:00 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Stopping a monopoly situation is a good thing .


3 posted on 07/10/2017 3:10:17 AM PDT by ncalburt (ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa
Should government go further in regulating merger and acquisition activities that have the potential to eliminate jobs

NO !

4 posted on 07/10/2017 3:44:26 AM PDT by onona (Stop stonewalling Judicial Watch and release the documents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
Stopping a monopoly situation is a good thing.

Unless you happen to be John McCain or anther member of the government monopoly.

Mr. niteowl77

5 posted on 07/10/2017 3:47:01 AM PDT by niteowl77 (Trust- but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Should government go further in regulating merger and acquisition activities that have the potential to eliminate jobs

NO !


6 posted on 07/10/2017 3:53:06 AM PDT by GizzyGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Should government interfere when a business decides to become more efficient? I thought we elected Trump to try to keep government from overstepping -— looks like we have gotten so used to it that we want to cherry pick where it oversteps to keep our s=personal sensibilities happy.


7 posted on 07/10/2017 4:09:05 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa; upchuck

SC Ping


8 posted on 07/10/2017 4:40:27 AM PDT by Gamecock ("We always choose according to our greatest inclination at the moment." R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

False question. Jobs aren’t the test, market share is.

Large cartels are certainly easier for a Fascist state to manage than a lot of small competitors. Small companies are more of a populist idea.

It all comes down to whether one is Wall Street or Main Street.


9 posted on 07/10/2017 5:16:40 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

“Antitrust laws are arguably a legitimate governmental action. What percentage of the Rx drug market would Walgreens/Rite-Aid, CVS, and Wal-Mart have?”

Here is one answer:

http://www.drugchannels.net/2017/02/the-top-15-us-pharmacies-of-2016.html

Here is another:

http://marketrealist.com/2016/01/overview-us-drugstore-industry/


10 posted on 07/10/2017 6:03:27 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Hmmm, I’m not sure what my line is, but this is probably at least in the vicinity.


11 posted on 07/10/2017 8:28:13 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson