1 posted on
06/08/2017 7:00:14 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
They’re all dead, Jim.....................
2 posted on
06/08/2017 7:04:01 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(You can't assimilate one whose entire reason for being here is to not assimilate in the first place.)
To: BenLurkin
I hate when a red dwarf flares my habitat.
3 posted on
06/08/2017 7:07:13 AM PDT by
DannyTN
To: BenLurkin
Krypton orbited a red sun and we all know what happened to it!..............................
4 posted on
06/08/2017 7:07:53 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(You can't assimilate one whose entire reason for being here is to not assimilate in the first place.)
To: BenLurkin
ok, who let the red dwarf have a phaser???
5 posted on
06/08/2017 7:10:20 AM PDT by
no-to-illegals
(If America Cared would a moslem cair?)
To: BenLurkin
Every time I hear one of these scumbag libtards spout off on TV, I start to wish OUR sun would turn into a red dwarf and put us all out of our misery.
8 posted on
06/08/2017 7:16:36 AM PDT by
july4thfreedomfoundation
("You can't fix America without pissing off the people who broke it".....Bill Mitchell)
To: BenLurkin
9 posted on
06/08/2017 7:17:23 AM PDT by
MNDude
(God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democratt)
To: BenLurkin
Keep Calm
And Blast Your Planets
with Mini-Flares,
Destroying their Habitability
To: BenLurkin
So a planet relying on unstable red dwarfs is like a conservative relying on Republicans, huh?
12 posted on
06/08/2017 7:23:50 AM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: BenLurkin
The “habitable zone” for a planet orbiting a red dwarf may be closer than Mercury is to our sun. And like Mercury the planet’s rotation around its axis would likely be phase-locked to its orbit, leaving one side in continual darkness and the other side in continual sunlight, blasted by red dwarf flares.
These factors and many others suggest that, with all the planets associated with the billions of stars in the Milky Way galaxy, the estimated probable number of planets with Earth-like conditions hospitable to intelligent life is likely very close to the experimentally known value of one.
To: BenLurkin
Whoops, wrong red dwarf.
18 posted on
06/08/2017 7:40:40 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: BenLurkin
presented the this week at the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society Probably 90% of the participants go there on government money where they hear boring lectures from 9-5 and then party till midnight or after.
20 posted on
06/08/2017 7:55:35 AM PDT by
libertylover
(In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
To: BenLurkin
This might shed more light on why these things happen.
21 posted on
06/08/2017 7:55:42 AM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: BenLurkin
That’s some serious climate change!
22 posted on
06/08/2017 8:05:16 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
To: BenLurkin
So is this a thinly veiled reference to Robert Reichhhhhhhhhh?
To: BenLurkin
Best candidates are those orbiting G2V stars, like our own.
Many are within 300 light years.
24 posted on
06/08/2017 8:24:55 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: BenLurkin
25 posted on
06/08/2017 8:27:56 AM PDT by
BwanaNdege
("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
To: BenLurkin
These Red Dwarf stars?
29 posted on
06/08/2017 9:20:12 AM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson