Posted on 04/19/2017 4:26:19 PM PDT by Morgana
Kids, animals, retarded people..is there *anything* he won’t hump??
A healthy woman near his own age.
This caused observers to wonder who was behind the communications. The conclusion was that the facilitator subconsciously made stuff up but did not realize it was coming from the subconscious, similar to automatic writing or a widgie board. also, there were cases of kids who suddenly could write elaborate sentences with correct spelling, even though they had not been taught to read or spell
.. several parents were jailed after the facilitator helped the kid quickly spell out elaborate descriptions of physical or sexual abuse, despite the fact that there was no physical evidence.
there are a lot of ways to help these kids communicate, including boards, computers, and sign language.
He's said that gorillas and monkeys have self-awareness, so they are superior to human infants and toddlers.
So he has said it's OK to kill a human child, but that an ape has "rights" that need to be respected.
YES, he has said that.
He's a vegetarian, too, because animals are so much more important than children.
This dude would make a fantastic Nazi
And I say that in the literal sense.
This guy is pure evil.
Then he is a human-hating hypocrite.
Livestock animals do not have self-awareness. Neither do most common pets, such as cats and dogs. But he holds their lives as more important than human lives? Morally and ethically, that argument holds no water, because infants who have no sense of self-awareness are on a trajectory of brain development that will lead to that sense. Animals, on the other hand, will never develop that sense. As cute, intelligent, and lovable Fido or Fluffy is, they do not have the capacity to develop self-awareness. Few animals do.
If he were consistent, he would be okay with the slaughter of livestock for food. If he thinks it acceptable to kill a 2 year old child (who will continue to develop neurologically for the next 2+ decades), then he must certainly think that it is acceptable to kill a cow for food, since that cow is far less developed intellectually than the child he would happily kill.
Ol’ Pete is really one piece of work.
When was the last time that guy got any action? /sarc>
...other than his own hands? /not sarc>
He’d screw them if he could avoid being torn apart.
Hmmm, given Singer’s criteria then we can sexually assault any liberal we find without consequence.
Some people just need a karmic curb stomping. Peter Singer is one of them.
Well none of us can comprehend why a sicko would want to sexually assault anyone, let alone assaulting a mentally challenged person. But it’s wrong in every describable way and in all the indescribable ways, it’s evil and worse...
No he would object to human sex with farm animals. The point is who cares what crazy homos think.
We should put him in a room with Eric Clanton and tell them the keys to their shackles are somewhere in the other person’s body and they only have 24hr of air.
Gee, I wonder what two ethics professors would decide to do?
Is this “consistent” ethicist Singer possibly telling us a thing or two about himself, in a veiled way?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.