They've been trained to respond positively to a woman, no matter what, and were upset to be agreeing with "Trump" as a female.
What a bunch of screwed up ideologues.
ibtz
Either way Donald Trump is better looking.
Hillary’s big negative was she was corrupt AF and everyone knew it. There would be no accountability or investigations into her administration.
Dress her up however you want, that fact remains.
Enter a hologram of the late Anthony Quinn, alone on the stage, dressed in dirty peasant clothes, singing...What if I were a rich man...ya, da- da- da- da- da?
More then that they are upset that when they stripped the “battle of the sexes” stupidity out of it they found they agreed with Trump. They didn’t like agreeing with him, but they did agree.
The Left simply cannot come to terms with their running an old, corrupt, banshee-voiced person (forget “woman” — she hardly displayed that in the classic sense) as their Presidential candidate. She was a TERRIBLE candidate, with absolutely nothing to recommend her but her betrayal by a husband who was looking for fun with an ACTUAL woman.
These crazed individuals who can’t even IMAGINE that Americans might prefer to elect one of the most successful businessmen of both the 20th and 21st centuries to fix the nation’s disastrously horrible economy are beyond reason, logic or help.
By tradition on FR, we often comment and reach conclusions based on the excerpt alone. In this case, I strongly recommend reading the whole article. It looks like it was done honestly, and it reaches useful conclusions: Hillary lost because of who she is and how she acts, not because she’s a woman.
Hillary is widely HATED by many because of her reign of terror as the first CO-PRESIDENT....it has nothing to do with her gender. It has everything to do with her cold heart, extreme leftist political views & history of completely unethical evil behavior.
Oh wow, that was insanely interesting. Go read the whole thing when you get a chance, Drummie.
What I find amusing (and sad) is that the bunch of them are still missing the forest for the trees.
Their aim was to understand us Deplorables & this was an exercise in Anthropological Studies of the strange creature washed up on the shore. It hasn’t hit them yet that all they comprehend when they view another person is the outer packaging. So caught up in identity politics in every interaction with another human being!
I fear they will only use this surprising exercise to fine-tune their next Candidate Package. Because it’s all about delivery & appearance, not character & accomplishment.
Thank you for posting this, RC. I too was surprised with the results... perhaps because I somehow expected there was more *there* there to our political opposites.
What a waste of time.
Hillary always was a little prick so there would be no need to switch genders.
But now that you mention it, her wearing all those badly fitting Nehru suits might point in another direction.
Mrs. Clinton: The unisex bathroom is ready for you.
Male or female she belongs in prison. Most intelligent people understand this and would not vote for her.
Great article; thanks for posting!! Seriously, the best article I've read in a good while.
(Also, IBTZ.)
(Just kidding! That was so rude!)
Hillary would still be know as “pantsuit”.
Fascinating. Thank you for finding and posting it.
I watched 5 minutes of the mock debate with the actors at NYU. They were very skillful actors, and were able to portray the gender switching quite well, I thought.
Here's my thinking:
So I came away believing (more strongly) that the gender doesn't really matter.
Curious what others thought...??
Once again, they continue to spread that lie. He never bragged about sexually assaulting women.
Many were shocked to find that they couldn’t seem to find in Jonathan Gordon what they had admired in Hillary Clinton—or that Brenda King’s clever tactics seemed to shine in moments where they’d remembered Donald Trump flailing or lashing out. For those Clinton voters trying to make sense of the loss, it was by turns bewildering and instructive, raising as many questions about gender performance and effects of sexism as it answered.
This is a fascinating psychological experiment. It looks like many of the liberals who attended the performance had their identity politics shaken.