GOVERNMENT OVERTHROW: HILLARY CLINTON SECRETLY PAID REPUBLICANS TO DESTROY TRUMP [fake]

Conservative Daily Post (Wikileaks document) ^ | 12/13/2016 | Michael Kohl

[A CA Guy]

“Republicans in name only” or “RINOs.” An email from John Podesta to Huma Abedin that was released as document number 1078645 is about to turn the speculation that certain prominent Republicans who opposed Donald Trump into the truth that they were, in fact, not just disloyal to Trump and the party but were on Hillary Clinton’s payroll.

The email, sent in July of this year, describes how funds were being diverted from Clinton’s campaign to the Super PACS of Jeb Bush, Carly Fiorina, and John Kasich.

[Dave W]

I agree, if this is true, is beyond the pale, but how does this violate the constitution? Be specific.

Why can't I take money and then criticize someone. It is dirty, but exactly how is it not constitutional. What article was violated? What law was broken?

It's immoral, ethically empty and disgusting. It would be nice to recall some of these folks, but I'm not quite sure what charges a prosecutor will encourage a grand jury to indict? Deceitfulness? Two-faced? Liars? Help me.

You want to change our whole form of government? Really? LOL! Wow, get a grip and take a deep breath.

[LucyT]

Article and comments, esp # 17 .

[Nifster]

It is not a coup. Trump will be swore in and his personal abilities will show them all

[867V309]

But isn’t that exactly what we’ve had for the past eight years?

So?

You want to trash a glorious Constitution, form of government, and way of life just because of 8 years of barkie?

That is very short sighted.

[cherry]

is that true?....figures....

[abigkahuna]

I can’t find the email in question. I keep getting no results for query. I type in the number, I try advance search for the dates of 2016-07-01 to 2016-07-31 and still no luck. I try search terms from the quote in the article. No luck.

Can anyone here pull up this email and post it with the tagging number so we can verify?

Thanks

[Royal Wulff]

Could not find email with id 1078645 at wikileaks.org

[philman_36]

I haven't found the email by ID number myself. Tried Wikileaks by ID mentioned and got nothing. A link in the article would have been nice.

Tread lightly until verified. JMO

[cherry]

I don’t think its illegal either....but its dirty...its dirty politics and when it sees the light of day its just almost unbelievable in its scope...

[867V309]

.

[philman_36]

Did the same things myself and got nothing.

[Ken H]

This is time to change our whole form of government.

No it isn't. See => http://www.freerepublic.com/~kenh/

[Lazamataz]

Lucy, this particular one is the most damning thing I have read in the last 20 years.

THIS is the big bomb we've been waiting for.

[abigkahuna]

I tried in the Podesta release...nothing. Used the number as a general search and pulls up a 2009 Global Intel file about KSA reluctant to use Nat Guard to fight Houthis.

I think this is dis-info and a “False News” story. There I said it...”Okay!”

[abigkahuna]

Hold Off Laz...I think its fake news. The email doesn’t pull up at wikileaks. Something is strange.

[Lazamataz]

You are correct, this one is so damning, it must be checked and crosschecked.

[Uncle Miltie]

If true, resignations, recalls, protests, attacks by Trump, all holy hell will rain down.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Need any proof that Beck took 100K or received 100K from Soros, since beck was exposing his nefarious network all the time. Some friends of mine helped Beck do this.

Now, if Kasich, or Jeb Bush, or even Fiorina “got” Democrat money, the question would then be, did they know it was from the Dems or was it funneled through cut-outs who masked the original source of it?

These questions need to be asked but first the allegations have to be proven.

[Lazamataz]

I am searching by quoted phrase at Wikileaks. Nothing.

“JB, CF, and JK PACS will be noticeably silent for the rest of the campaign. Each will receive a significant allowance from advertising budget. HRC is in the loop and has talked to all three personally. Eyes only.”

[Chaguito]

The email shown in the article has nothing to do with the contents of the article.